>>62275877
Checked and ikd but it's telling how Chris/fishy/juels et al are ignoring CLPR like their lifes depend on it.

>>62275893
>CLPR
Is this the new talking point? A acronym we have never heard of is another chainlink killer?

>>62275918
yes its very 'organically' being spammed across this board right now in every thread, not being shilled directly because they know that doesn't work here (they tried one thread and got no traction). hedera shills are the least organic in the space, likely because they're mostly bought/paid for, another anon saved screen caps of their payout program for the shills. also the leemon face memes are awful, just being ugly is not enough to create a meme you fucking jeets.

>>62275930
Yes it is in every thread right now becase I am posting about it nigger, because I hold LINK and find it strange how everyone is just fucking ignoring it ok? How about you discuss the tech instead of making up stories about hedera shills.

>>62276007
nobody is ignoring it 'nigger' (oh wow you're clearly from here so impressed), nobody's making up stories if you've been on this board for years you'd know, the fact you chose to get offended about that says it all though. also "discuss the tech" kek there's nothing to discuss, if there was you and the hbar shills would be doing it. you're just spamming buzzword and pretending to be fearful uncertain doubtful link baggies.

>>62276018
wordswordswords yet you said nothing regarding CLPR, only adhoms directed at me, because you did zero fucking research on this CLPR thing and are just complacent that whatever this new tech is it won't kill CCIP.
You remind me of xerpies with their head in the sand not wanting to listen about anything chainlink is doing and still talking about muh nostro vostro acounts.

>>62276041
bro only time will tell if it will kill CCIP

Im sure DTCC / SWIFT / euroclear are willing to switch to this brand new wonder technology after working with Chainlink for +10 years

>>62276069
>Im sure DTCC / SWIFT / euroclear are willing to switch to this brand new wonder technology after working with Chainlink for +10 years
The thing is that DTCC is not even using CCIP, they will be using CRE as far as I can see.
It's not like this CLPR thing makes all of Chainlink obsolete, just CCIP.

>>62276085
CCIP is part of CRE...

>>62276041
>wordswordswords
oh the ironing

>>62276088
No CRE is the orchestration layer but you can use CRE without using CCIP.

kek this is literally what one of the hired shills posted in another thread (they're spamming it in like 10 different threads now):

>I'd say chainlink has sizeable state in HBAR. Sergey is not dumb he knew the writing was on he wall when no oher DLT could be as fast or cheap as HBAR.

you need to hire better indians lmao

>>62276103
Whatever helps you sleep at night kiddo. If theyre not using CCIP, what are they using/testing?

https://www.dtcc.com/-/media/Files/Downloads/DTCC-Connection/Smart_NAV-Report.pdf

>>62275930
>everything is FUD
fucking faggot i just want this thing snuffed out in the cradle because I do think the founder is intelligent and definitely capable of good tech. AND HES GOING ON ABOUT INFINITE LIQUIDITY, BRIDGELESS BRIDGING, AND ORACLE WORKFLOWS. THIS IS RIGHT UP CLL’s ANUS, COULD NOT GET ANY FURTHER.

i just want an authority from CLL to give their opinions. They likely know everything about it given they’re on the council, fucking tard. Guaranteed CL will be a tremendous beneficiary.

>>62276355
im op btw

>>62276313
That's from May 2024, I'm talking about what the DTCC is doing with Chainlink in 2026, and it's about CRE not CCIP.

>>62276355
>Guaranteed CL will be a tremendous beneficiary.
yEAH so why aren't they talking about it? Because they do marketing and shit on X nowadays and they talk about everything that is remotely good for Chainlink yet nothing about this, obv that's because CLPR is a BAD thing for CCIP.

>>62276379
>That's from May 2024
Theyre doing the same thing they did in 2024 with them.

So if theyre not using CCIP, what are they using/testing? You conveniently forgot to address this part.

>>62276432
They are using just CRE to build the workflows that will be used on the DTCC Collateral Appchain which IIRC is Hyperledger Besu. This is not about CCIP it's just about CRE.

>>62276007
We ignore it because it is DOGSHIT. It can’t function on other chains. It is just a fucking bridge from shitchain 1 to Hedara shitgraph shitchain. It doesn’t do anything else it isn’t even in the same fucking universe as CCIP. It’s like wondering why Hulk Hogan is ignoring Jethro Methbilly trash talking him at the local neighborhood back yard wrestling match.

>>62276453
Youre still not answering the question you dumb fuck. What interoperability solution are they testing?

>>62276484
>What interoperability solution are they testing?
None. It's not about interoperability as far as I can tell.
>Chainlink will be integrated into DTCC’s Collateral AppChain to enable the seamless pairing of asset prices, valuations and movement with the aim of overhauling how market risk is managed globally. CRE is built to operate at institutional scale and provides access to a resilient data and orchestration layer, unlocking automated workflows for the Collateral AppChain’s advanced eligibility, valuation, margining, collateral optimization, settlement, and related post-trade processes. Rather than relying on one-off integrations, CRE provides a reusable framework that enables DTCC’s Collateral AppChain to scale across new data types, asset classes and collateral use cases.
>“By leveraging tokenization and distributed ledger technology (DLT) to modernize collateral mobility, our goal is to enable 24/7, near real-time collateral management across global markets and blockchains,” said Nadine Chakar, DTCC Managing Director, Global Head of Digital Assets. “The integration of Chainlink’s CRE and data standard will allow us to deliver a unified on-chain environment, bringing on-chain asset prices, valuations and other collateral agreement data to support this transformative industry initiative.”
https://www.dtcc.com/news/2026/may/12/dtcc-collaborates-with-chainlink-to-advance-24-7-collateral-management

>>62276476
>It can’t function on other chains.
Read nigga read:
>The CLPR protocol is designed to be chain-agnostic and support major EVM-compatible networks, including Ethereum, Hyperledger Besu and Avalanche subnets. Any network that can produce or verify state proofs is a candidate for CLPR, regardless of whether it is a public or private network.
https://hashgraph.com/clpr/

>>62276355
>infinite liquidity, bridgeless bridging, oracle workflows
the same shit is spouted by the marketing department of every oracle and bridging solution that comes out. in the end they all work the same way. you read the state from somewhere offchain and you relay it on-chain. it is not rocket science and there is no magic bullet.

>>62276513
>None. It's not about interoperability as far as I can tell.

>DTCC Champions “Interoperability” as the Key to Industry Adoption of Digital Asset Securities

https://www.dtcc.com/dtcc-connection/articles/2026/march/04/building-interoperable-digital-asset-markets

Just kill yourself.

>>62276476
enough w the gaslighting, no one knows shit except hbag and CLL.

>>62276098
Word
Sword
Swords

>>62276544
You are confused. That's from March 2026, not May 2026, so different things. Your link is just a generic press release that has nothing to do with what is going in production later this year. The DTTC thing that is going live with Chainlink is CRE for collateral management.

>>62276559
>You are confused. That's from March 2026, not May 2026, so different things
No.

>The DTTC thing that is going live with Chainlink is CRE for collateral management.
Which includes CCIP. https://chain.link/hyperledger-besu-interoperability

>>62276551
hedera is late to the party, state proofs have been floated as a bridging solution for years and they just aren't practical whatsoever.

>>62276570
Yes NIGGER I already responded to that argument here >>62276103
CCIP is part of CRE but they are not using CCIP only CRE.

>>62276577
>state proofs have been floated as a bridging solution for years and they just aren't practical whatsoever.
Can you expand on that? I'm actually interested in the tech unlike the other niggers ITT.

>>62276580
>>62276513
>https://www.dtcc.com/news/2026/may/12/dtcc-collaborates-with-chainlink-to-advance-24-7-collateral-management

>The Chainlink stack provides the essential data, INTEROPERABILTY, compliance, and privacy standards needed to power advanced blockchain use cases for institutional tokenized assets, lending, payments, stablecoins, and more.

>CCIP is part of CRE but they are not using CCIP only CRE.
Theyre using every product chainlink offers.

>>62276590
>>The Chainlink stack provides the essential data, INTEROPERABILTY, compliance, and privacy standards needed to power advanced blockchain use cases for institutional tokenized assets, lending, payments, stablecoins, and more.
You took that from the generic "About Chainlink" paragraph at the bottom of the article, which has NOTHING to do with the press release in and of itself, which ends at the "###" symbol.

>>62276608
It has everything to do with the press release because its mentioned in the press release lol

So if the DTCCs states ""Interoperability” as the Key to Industry Adoption" which solution are they using? Seems like its the most important part of this all working. How does Besu communicate with other chains?

>>62276626
>Seems like its the most important part of this all working
Most important? Look nigger they seem to only be using Besu and Canton so obviously the interoperability thing is not that big of a priority considering they don't give two shits about public DLTs.

>>62276643
>Most important?
https://www.dtcc.com/dtcc-connection/articles/2026/march/04/building-interoperable-digital-asset-markets

>DTCC Champions “Interoperability” as the Key to Industry Adoption of Digital Asset Securities

Are you retarded?

>>62276662
There you are again talking about a different press release.
We are talking about the May 2026 press release, not the March 2026 one.
Are you a bot or what?

>>62276587
blockchains are typically merkle trees that produce a new "state root" with every block. this is what keeps a blockchain verifiable all the way back through genesis. a "state proof" proves that a block was legitimately produced, and since transaction hashes in the block are used to generate the block hash, you can prove that a given transaction occurred in that block. This is how blockchains have always worked and we used "state proofs" all the time to know what the true state of the chain is. Verifying a state proof is easy to do off-chain, because we have access to the whole state and can check the proof against that state, but in the case of a bridging solution, a recipient blockchain has no knowledge of the state of sender blockchains, and therefore needs to be somehow told what the state is so it can check the proof. It's a tantalizing idea because state proofs are such a fundamental concept to blockchains, that surely one blockchain could prove claims about its state to another blockchain, but because they are essentially blind to one another, it can't happen unless the validators of the recipient blockchain literally communicate with the validators of the sending blockchain to verify the state. interconnecting the networks that way. otherwise you need to rely on a third party to do that work for you, and trust that their signature of the data is valid instead. here, for example, is fucking algorand from 2022 talking about their state proof bridging and oracle solution:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEsaen_kMUU