If Bitcoin is going to 40k then how does it ever get to $1 million? In what like 50 fucking years?>2017 20k>2021 70k>2025 120k>2029 200k>2033 275k>2037 325k>2041 350kNever mind, it actually just never gets there. Why even buy this shit at this point? It's unironically over, just buy index funds.
>>62278083exactly, it's over unironically.
L1s are not looking good here. Solana unironically might be the best option since Pump just made their app multi-chain and all gas is sponsored by them. Gas is universally paid in Solana now now matter which shitcoin you buy.
>>62278089what happened to the pump lawsuit or investigation or whatever
>>62278092I don't know, but the guy that owns it is a jewish billionaire so I'm sure they'll be ok..
It has been a pleasure watching all of your gentlemen grow up and realize crypto was a scam all along.
ITT: classic bear market FUDYou guys were singing the same tune in 2014
Bro, it's not even getting above $100k next cycle (2029). The dome theory is real.
>>62278109we didn't even have signs of diminishing returns at that point DUMBFUCK
>>62278109in 2014 none of these ideas had been really tested. now they have, and they failed hard.
>>62278109you couldn't open a schwabinhood account in 3 clicks to gamble with real assets back then
>>62278116There are no diminishing returns in crypto because there is no production process related to these returns, no input and no outputWho’s the retard now?
>>62278083There are a lot of large buy orders coming before 50 fucking years. For example, the US is going to buy 1,000,000 BTC over the next 5 years.
>>62278127This is true, crypto was much more difficult to acquire back then. Yet the global adoption of BTC still remains very low today, and institutions are still eclipsed by retail. We have much room to grow in the next decades, enough to rise up to $10,000,000 per BTC.
>>62278148>this is me totally being objective and not just wanting to get rich
>>62278083>If Bitcoin is going to 40k then how does it ever get to $1 million? In what like 50 fucking years?Unironically a reasonable timescale, yes.
>>62278398That could be a 10% growth rate over 50 years and still get to $10,000,000, not much different than the S&P 500.
>>62278577yes and satoshi will have a quadrillion dollars. enjoy bread being 100 dollars
>>62278587I’m not American so not my problem, lol
>>62278596thank god, theres hope that europeans are just as fucking dumb
>>62278667>your dumb lolAnother /biz/ masterclass
i asked gemini to complete a logical suite with every bitcoin ath and bitcoin atl and he gave me52K next bottom and 160K next top
>>62278587The bread i sell already is $99.99 minimum so i guess i'm going to adjust prices.
