Orbital data centers will enable data growth and efficiency many times greater than we have now. Re-useable rockets will make building them affordable and Starlink will be our way of connecting into them.Together, this is going to revolutionize the way we think about data. It is the missing piece of the AI puzzle but here there is nothing but doomer posting and negativity about it. Why? It is clearly going to be the next bull run. Even before orbital mining.
When the board is flooding with doom it means we will pump soon
>>62278896>Orbital data centers will enable data growth and efficiency many times greater than we have now.explain how orbital data centers solve the waste heat problem.
>space
>>62278907By harnessing the unlimited power of solar which is infinite and more efficient in space.
>>62278907>>62278907>The average baseline temperature of empty deep space is about -270...are you indian?
>>62278896KEEP FIRING ASSHOLES!
>>62278916That doesn't answer the question
>>62278917go have a discussion with chatgpt or something.
>>62278896Because people think SpaceX is overvalued at $1.75B. Furthermore, they think the Nasdaq-100 rules being changed for the SpaceX IPO are a massive scam being perpetrated on passive investors
>>62278917Vacuum is a super-effective thermal insulator. Conduction and convection don't work in the vacuum of space.
>>62278917>Orbital data centers will be in deep spaceThat's a massive orbit, bro
>>62278907There is also the issue of high-energy radiation. Space-grade electronics usually need to use triple redundancy or radiation-hardened circuitry to handle the effects of radiation. You can't simply use normal electronics in space.
>>62278941This, not only you lack heat dissipation but just a couple solar panels are also nowhere near enough to cover a datacenter wattage, you will need a bigass array.Then you have the radation degrading the hardware very fast, plus irregular dangers like solar flares, meteorites and other space fuckery.This is a very stupid idea.
>>62278907Radiators, which add mass and cost
>>62278952Just wrap it in lead.
>>62278896Trump Derangement Syndrome.
>>62278896Because leftists hate Elon for his politics and Twitter posts. I live in a very liberal city and meet these people irl. SpaceX will be a huge success.
>>62278931ok>In orbit:>your radiator can point at ~3 K background spacethere’s no atmosphere trapping infrared radiation>no humidity>no weather>So the potential ceiling for thermal management is very attractive....>Yes — space being cold is one of the major reasons the idea is attractive.>More precisely:>deep space provides an extremely cold >background temperature>that makes thermal radiation very effective compared to Earth>That’s a genuine advantage.and furthermore >The image they used looks like an anime reaction image — specifically a smug/unimpressed expression meant to mock or dismiss someone online.>It doesn’t really say anything about whether your argument is correct. It’s more:>“lol go ask ChatGPT”>implying you’re overthinking or saying something naïve>Ironically, after actually discussing it, your core claim turned out pretty reasonable:>orbital data centers are difficult>but space’s thermal environment is genuinely one of the reasons they may become viable in the future>So the meme response was more social dunking than a serious technical rebuttalApologies will be accepted via bitcoin donations
>>62279004>there’s no atmosphere trapping infrared radiationSo the least effective way at transferring heat is slighly better in space than on Earth?
>>62278993thank you 1pbtid bot
>>62278917are you? lmaofucking kys
>>62278896Space datacenters are a memeAsteroid mining is a memeMoon/Mars colony is a memeSpaceX is 100% a meme and SPCX will be a meme stock
>>62278932What? You’re telling me that NASDAQ (former chairman: Bernie Madoff) could actually be corrupt???
>>62278917>>62278957good morning, mulattoe zoomers who were "no child left behind" for the duration of their public school science education. you might want to begin researching radiation heat transfer and the challenges it imposes.
>>62279104hurrr my sci fi fantasy doesn't conform>>62279297>you might want to begin researching radiation heat transfer and the challenges it imposeslol dumb nerds, space is cold
>>62279455>my sci fi fantasy doesn't conformTo reality and the laws of physics? Yeah we noticed
I don't like to admit it, but there really is no reason for us to go to space and other planets asides from mere ambition and maybe some technological breakthroughs. Overpopulation will also take a while to become a real issue.
Gemini suggests the key engineering hurdle will be heat dissipation. Because of the vacuum of space, your only heat dissipation will be black body radiation, which is slow and requires heavy radiators, which makes launching that much more expensive.Looks like hype for retards with a finished product years behind schedule and missing promised features, a la Cybertruck.But the retards will say "muh TDS" and have faith. Must be nice at the head of a cult.
>>622789179/10 bait, or a genuine jeet/mutt
>>62279297Elon Musk invented Falcon 9 reuseable launch systems with innovative Merlin engines comparable to the Epstein Drive as well as tabless structural electrode packs with super-charging and LiDAR self-driving EV technology. I am sure that he can overcome these insignificant hurdles now with the intellectual power of AI.
>Kessler syndrome
Best case scenario spacex mines an asteroid in 50 years. Can you hold that long?
>>62279891>Epstein DriveKek...its real. Next gen will be the weinstein thruster
>>62278896spacex has not turned a profit once since its inception. read their IRS form 10-k. you really think it's an educated decision to buy into? what are you? some retarded pajeet?
All your (American subhuman) pensions will be tied to this company, kek!
>>62278896>Orbital data centers will enable data growth and efficiency many times greater than we have nowWhy?>Together, this is going to revolutionize the way we think about data. It is the missing piece of the AI puzzle How?
>>62278896What happened to basic science education in this country
Space elevator fucking when, Musk?
>>62280621Because marketing buzzwords, that's why.
>>62280547Has the market ever been rational?
>>62280547Tesla was also a meme stock that wasn't profitable until 10 years after their IPO but if you had bought then, you'd be up 34,000% on your investment.
>>62278896Space is fake
>>62281307for the most part it has. monetary value has always been transferred to what's positively speculated to be valuable. >>62281347it was public in 2010 and turned profits after 3 years. it's a similar scenario, but an inequivalent comparison. just because it rained yesterday does not mean it will rain today.
>>62281489>just because it rained yesterday does not mean it will rain today.Sure but you're acting like it can't rain today based on variables that have never prevented it in the past, and in fact seem common to the situation before it happens.
>>62281510your reasoning isn't as sound. invest as you will. i will wait.
>>62278953>it's too risky to tryGoybrain take you got there
>>62281347Tesla became public in 2010, exactly at the beginning of one of the greatest bull runs ever on the entire stock market, while SpaceX will be public around the end of this bull market.Also, Elon Musk is 16 years older and the market cap of both companies rely on the assumption that one single individual, Elon Musk, is going to be healthy and alive. If he dies after taking too many drugs or whatever, your investment loses 90% overnight.
>>62281489>turned profits after 3 yearsYeah, for a single quarter. It wasn't consistently profitable until 2020. For 10 years, it would have looked like you were a dumbass investing in vaporware.>just because it rained yesterday does not mean it will rain todayNo shit, Sherlock. I'm providing a counter-example to your idiotic assertion that a company that hasn't been profitable yet is a bad investment. There's much more that needs to be factored into that decision.
>>62281632>Tesla became public in 2010, exactly at the beginning of one of the greatest bull runs ever on the entire stock market, while SpaceX will be public around the end of this bull market.You guys have been predicting the end of the bull market since the beginning of the bull market.And when it does eventually come, you'll act like you're some kind of guru because you predicted it would end in 2010 and 2011 and 2012 and 2013 and 2014 and 2015 and 2016 and 2017 and 2018 and 2019 and 2020 and 2021 and 2022 and 2023 and 2024 and 2025 and 2026
>>62280348>weinstein thrusterthis technology only exists deep in the underground tunnels of the synagogues
>>62281664>You guysStopped reading right here, as I am not "you guys"Can’t answer the rest of your post as I didn’t bother reading it
>>62281664The bull market runs on the money printer and the bull market will end when the sovereign debt enters runaway. If someone told you hyperinflation tomorrow in 2010 or great reset in 2025 that's a them problem.
>>62281360Bots and retards. That's we are left with.
>>62278911>space
>>62278896i do not understand how this is cheaper than just building it on the ground. No one to protest against it is a plus i guess
Retards that think SpaceX doesn't moon have TDS and are elon hating libtard gayboys. Wish I could bet my life savings on that.
>>62282410Why can't you?
>>62282444no life savings left because of previous bets
>>62278917Factually incorrect.Deep space is actually 0 because there isn't any weather to make it colder. The problem with the waste heat is that if it's too close to earth it'll just reenter our atmosphere. It would actually be better if the data centers orbited the moon.
>>62278896prob will buy a lil
>>62282391This. There are no NIMBYs in space.
