IT ALWAYS GOES UP!Bobo is temporary, Mumu is forever!
>>62283018>please buy my overpriced bags before the market crashes
>please buy my overpriced bags before the market crashes
>>62283018that's a really good point. I just buyed
now show other market index's like the FSTE 100, is it even above 2008 levels yet????
>>62283039ONE nothing wrong with meTWO
It's always misleading as fuck>Your current holdings get rekt by 90%>It's okay though the stuff you buy from this point onwards is cheap and will grow in recovery>But what about everything I held before?>Still rekt for years on end>We cope by calling that "reducing your average buy in"Not falling for it personally
>>62283018Objective truth. Never doom.
so why should we be immune from a Japan style 30 year stagnation? We had one before 1960. Allowing retards like Trump in power is begging for it.
>>62283382Then buy Chinese or Euro stocks, most of which have already been sideways for ~2 decades.
>>62283382Japan largely stopped being innovative desu, not America’s case so far
>>62283411Many famous Euro stocks are actually down 30 or 40% since 2000 lol (Mercedes-Benz, Shell, Deutsche Bank, Philips, Bouygues, UniCredit, Veolia…)
>>62283185So you need to have over 30m now to have what a millionaire had 1900. That's why millionaire was really special back then. So a million now is not even 30k in 1900.
>>62283444I'm also amazed at some Chinese ones. Vanke used to be the flagship of Chinese stock market and the most prestigious real estate developer. The ticker number for it was chosen to be 000002, after 000001 being the Shanghai Composite Index
>>62283452That distinction still exists, we call them UHNWIs nowadays
>>62283465>VankeLooks like a crypto after the rug pull, almost as bad as Vivendi and Orange (the absolute juggernauts of the French stock market in 2000, they were supposed to crush the world with all their ambitious tech… 26 years later, still 90% down after the bubble burst…)
>>62283018So they're just flat-out admitting that inflation has been 10% every year since 1950?
>>62283039Is this inflation adjusted?
>>62283598Dividing SPX by the USM2 is almost the same thing as adjusting to inflation.
>>62283411How do you know which stock market might be the next Nikkei? It went up, until it didn't, and then took 35 years to recover
>>62283790>which stock market might be the next Nikkei?All of them
>>62283018>just wait like 5 years goy, don't sell, it'll return to green eventually
>>62284284>the twin towers of anon's portfolio
just buy and hold for 45 years, that's my motto
>>62284502kek and they're right next to "september 11", I swear it was unintentional
>>62284646>DUDE JUST WORK AND DEAL IN THE REAL WORLD FOR 45 YEARS do goyim really?
>>62283021>>62284284>>62284646whats the alternative?>inb4 just buy gold
>>62284502Kek>>62285025The market can keep on being exuberant for many months, so keep more and more cash by your side, a play that’s too contrarian like leveraged shorts could wipe you
>>62283018>IT ALWAYS GOES UP!Until it doesn't.
>>62283258>>Your current holdings get rekt by 90%That never happened though. And you can just hodl and it usually bounces back within. A few months like OP's chart shows.
Wagmii
>>62283018>IT ALWAYS GOES UP!Except for where it goes down
>>62286525Literally the best time to buy though. How do you think gains are made.
>>62286638Boughted at peak - fucked for 25 years
>>62286688Wow you only ever got income once in 25 years and it corresponded to a market peak? What a wild life you've lived.
>Wow you only ever sold your house once in 25 years?>Wow you only ever inherited once in 25 years?
>put brexit on the graph like england actually mattersholy delusional little broski wilted flower
>>62286688Investing in 1935 looks comfy. 32 and 33 you had to perfectly time it to catch the bottom.
>>62286688The Nikkei 225 is ever better, 35 years before recovering if you bought the top in 1989
Listen folks, diversify, you want at least 3 different stocks
>>62286596If assumed to be linear we still have a ways to go before we reach the peak
>>62286756You've never heard of DCA and you're being smug about it
>>62286919But Vanguard research taught us that:>Lump-sum investment strategies beat common cost averaging investmentstrategies two-thirds of the time, according to historical and simulatedmarket dataThis is science, you must go all in with all your funds immediately, just unplug your brain and buy the top!!!
>>62286996Sorry for botched greentext lol
>>62285025
>>62283018check the Nikkei 225
>>62283018>just pick the right ones at all times
>>62283030this
What a bullshit graph. SPY went down like 50% during The Great Recession. This makes it look like it went down 8% lol.
>>62286553small caps have had 90%+ drawdowns many times. most companies fail over time.DCA index funds works. DCA shitty company = lose your house
>>62286553If you want to be pedantic the percentage might be 80 something percent instead, the point still stands. OPs chart is misleading in a number of ways, first and foremost because it has been squeezed on the X axis so that a block of 20 fucking years looks like nothing, do that to many charts and they will look great and smoothes out those "dips".The Y axis is presumably % gain, if you are rekt for 80%, you need a 400% gain to get back to that level, at 10% YoY that's 16 years to recover those crashed assets. Yes you are buying more in the meantime, and those assets are increasing in value 10% YoY, fantastic. Everything you held before stays wrecked for years and the cope is to factor it all in together and take an average.
