This is just highly hypothetical and will probably never happen, but: What would be the economical implications if globohomo corpo were to hire wagies again because AI is too expensive? On one side I see the immediate implosion of the tech (or even entire) stock market and everything connected to it. But on the other side, there's suddenly an obscene amount of "new" jobs and economic growth in first world countries. This might be an unprecedented situation, as historically (pre crypto/covid) economical recession/growth cycles lasted for years with (at least somewhat) real definable causes. This time however it's just>Oh...we can just stop attempting to fully replace wagies with AI and are better off doing so anyway.With recent news articles reporting this, a trend shift will have immediate economical ramifications, much faster than COVID for example. Possibly a recession and adjustment period lasting only a few weeks, followed by one of the greatest economic booms and wealth accumulation possibilities the world yet has seen. How would you prepare for this scenario, other than selling all your tech investments when the first signs appear? Couldn't the news articles and sinking BTC value indicate that it's happening soon? Reinvest in a completely different sector or try to time the bottom of tech securities/commodities that don't rely on AI?
>>62283532>Image>he's realAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>62283532dont even joke lad
>>62283532thats my mate
>>62283532>But on the other side, there's suddenly an obscene amount of "new" jobs and economic growth in first world countries.Everything these people have done seems to indicate they will do everything they can to avoid doing just that thing. If any new jobs will be created, they will be created in third-world nations or they will be created for H1Bs.
>>62283532One of the most retarded posts I've ever read, but that lad in the photo is an absolute legend. These men conquered the entire globe in the 18th Century. RULE, BRITANNIA!
>>62284940I just now realized this is somehow considered a controversial image in the UK. I didn't think so at first glance because it just reminds me of a person here in America wearing an American flag outfit.
>>62283532>But on the other side, there's suddenly an obscene amount of "new" jobs and economic growth in first world countries.There is? Where? In what sectors?
>>62285055Who cares what bri*ish people think? They let muslims rape their country and don't fight back.
