Is the June 12 $spcx IPO gonna moon first day? Should I sell my entire portfolio and YOLO in day 1?
>>62296407is will most likely pump hard for a couple days then dump hard after insider selloffs, then recover in a quarter or two and continue to grow
>>62296407>buying into the wall where everyone's trying to hedge their longs and those that can get out are trying to take some profits and shed some risk on Day 1Sounds like a pretty decent way to reduce your port size by 25% in 1 market day. Go for it.
>>62296498You don't think it will pamp day 1? I think it might
>>62296489I think this is right. I’m sure the WH insiders will treat it like the Steve Madden ipo in Wolf of Wall Street.
>>62296407You cannot get in on SpaceX fast enough it is one of the greatest corporations to have ever existed.
>>62296489>>62296516This is what I'm thinking. I actually don't see how it couldn't be the case.
>>62296521I don't know about this. I'm all for space exploration but I don't think I actually believe they will be able to pull off much more than what they currently do with dragon launches to the iss and satelliete stuff, as in mars stuff. but i DO believe in greed
>>62296510It could moon, I don't know. I was just mentioning the worst case to negate Star Boy's comment above me.
>>62296533LOL
>>62296489Everyone thinks this so it will do the opposite
>>62296602I don't think so, personally
Looking over finances, and there's currently a 4:1 debt-to-revenue stream due to infrastructure related ai development costs. There's attempts to offset by increasing starlink subscription costs, increase commercial launches, more government contracting, etc. At current rate, they're not expecting cash positive revenue generation at least until Q4'27. Financials will probably be a big factor in catalyst cycles for spcx. With this in mind, when it goes public, I'll probably buy in quarterly tranches to first assess how markets react to their earnings releases being negative—you never know how it will go; even a miss can send it higher because the miss wasn't as big of a miss as originally forecasted. Sounds great for 2028 and after. Will be looking for dip buying opportunities in addition to quarterly tranches.
>>62297112I'm talking strictly day 1 moon opportunities, chatgpt. double my portfolio in 1 day type of plays. but i appreciate the knowledge
>>62296407you can still buy pre-ipo
>>62296407The only reason to buy a stock is if you think it is undervalued. Why would SpaceX be undervalued? What value are they going to provide in the future they don't now? How do they make money? And how would they make more money in the future than they do today?
>>62297450>62297450Gonna crash at open
>>62297460As if moosk's other 20 comapnies are based in funamentals?
>>62297460>fundamentalsKek, get a load of this guy
I've decided to yolo half of my portfolio in day 1.
>>62297468i saw some fucking normie youtube musk slop...the tard was convinced that giving money to elon gets you a 40+% cagr because thats what elon gets if you divide market cap by his initial personal investments into tesla, spacex,paypal etc... thats the kind of girl math youre up against.
>>62297579Is that not true though
It's just an exit liquidity IPO. You have to be a dumb goy not to see this.
>>62297585Does this mean dump first day though. I don't think it does
>>62297582elon gets that return on his own money...everyone else is buying post ipo inflated 200+p/e companies that are losing money
>>62297607So what are you trying to say?
>>62297609the kind of person willing to buy this shit is super retarded. there is just enough of them that you can make money if you get out quick enough
>>622976121 day, 2 trades is what I'm thinking
$XOVR - 20 percent of the Fund is SPCX $NASA - 10 percent of the Fund is SPCX
>>62297656intredasting
real talk anons, isnt "the crash" coming in in 5 months, not the first day? We will be burning the boomer's money till then. What do I buy 5 months from now? Help a financially illiterate anon out
>>62297656vulgar-fatlow class thirdy detected
I won't be buying, so it will moon hard for many months on end.
>>62296407it depends. you like pain?
>>62297466this
>>62299091I was very wrong
>>62297112> 4:1 debt-to-revenue and they're raising starlink prices again? lmaoquarterly tranches on a negative earnings stock is just hopium with extra steps.
>>62296407It would probably be an easy win if they weren't so greedy with setting the initial target valuation at $2 TRILLION.
>>62302018factoring in the secret reverse engineered alien free energy tech
>>62297582> not true, just cope from people who can't handle the reality of the situation
>>62302131the reality being..
