At this point the probability of the LINK being needed is low. Logically thinking there would be at least SOME buying pressure from other people in the know and price would be held up at key points with traces of bullish absorption in the chart yet theres none of that just a fast move up into a slow bleed. If you do any type of chart watching you would know exactly what im talking about. With just a glance at the LINK chart you can tell there is not a single good/bullish thing about it. You can't convince me people involved in these announcements with chainlink wouldn't buy some themselves and talk to their other high-class or wealthy friends and those people would buy and word would continue to spread. It just doesnt make sense unless.... the people with inside knowledge know LINK isnt necessary for the services chainlink provides.Call me a faggot call me indian call me fudder call me retard but it just doesnt make ANY sense despite all of these announcements and the apparent fact that these giant companies are using chainlink that the LINK does not trend upward. I dont know why im posting this I guess I just wanted to get some thoughts from you guys or rant into the void. Ive been in since 2021 and bought around 15 dollars. I'm not sure if I can hold much longer and on the other hand I dont know what I would even buy even if I sold. I wish I could invest in the company Chainlink.
How big is your stack
>LINK starts to moon in sats>fuddies get riled upLike clockwork
>>62312653ironically this is exactly how they get away with their accumulation. either during btc dips or OTC buys. meanwhile retail looks at the price, demoralization continues, they continue to accumulate.
Sell it all for XMR, Linkbros
>>62312653>mooning in satsare they in the room with us right now?
>>62312614>At this point the probability of the LINK being needed is low.fucking shill faggotit's zerodon't give these stinkers hope
>>62312653im a fuddie link was due for its last little green midget candle against bitcoin and this was it. every little grrn cndle pump gets yall uephoricyall should sell now unironically. ill screenshot this so i cn remind yall again later
and just like that linkjeets will never rise above $8 dollars ever again
>>62312833say it with me: pain and misery are their ONLY friends xD
>>62312833they will in the next bull run in a few years and it will hit 17 then under 5 dollars by 2030 after every last link marine has invested everything they had into their cultall of crypto is like this, every coin
>>62312614even some retarded normie in my office has 1k link. this shit is going nowhere.
it's April 2026 and there's a link thread on the front pageit's a problem of neuroplasticity. you're supposed to be able to evaluate new ideasthe fact link is still remembered is bizarre. it's just another worthless token from the first ethereum ico waveit's like being stuck in dragonchain
is being stuck a consequence of being on this board?you have people who regularly make fun of linkies. this creates a tribal identity of "I'm a linkie, I'm not selling"feedback loop of autism that lasts for years and leads to financial ruin
>>62312881>>62312891If you actually pay even a modicum of attention to crypto you know that LINK is one of less than 5 out of millions of cryptos seeing constant adoption. One of less than 5 actually relevant tokens. And you are here spewing this. Being you must be very sad.
>>62312913does adoption = price crash? cuz if so, miss me on that
>>62312913And yet adoption has done nothing for actual holders, because like people have been warning you for years, there's no connection between what CLL is doing with backroom cash deals and the price of the coin.
Ka-BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMlink
>>62312614Regulation my nigga
>>62312653>LINK/BTC trading at 2017 levelscongratulations cuckold
KABOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM
>>62312945>does adoption = price crash?Chainlink adoption = Bitcoin price crash
>>62313738Chainlink adoption = Sergey gets rich = cuckold baggies get fuckedYou got that?
>>62313745You've been saying this for years now.Either you're still holding Link yourself, or you somehow benefit from spamming the same lines for years.Which is it?
haha, linkies are losing money
the future of finances is ruining their finances haha
>>62313762>linkies are losing moneyIn the last 7 days Link is doing better than almost the entire top 20.
>>62313758I'm getting paid by Simeon, what are you gonna do about it Stinkshitter?
>>62312614hey OP, i'm a link holder from the presale we did here, let me explain as simply as possible why the price doesn't appreciate even if we get all those partnerships, people on X call me a fuddie, I mostly "FUD" is it really fudding when you're trying to get the team to move their asses? i don't know, but blindly supporting the team in everything they do is stupid as hell, i prefer to "FUD" all the time even though it hurts my bags, btw the only crypto i hold and i'm all in in, is LINK, i got a fat stack fully staked in multiple wallets since the 0.1.here is the simple reason why we don't pump:the fucking SCALE PROGRAM.why? first, let me explain what SCALE is, scale basically is a deal between chainlink LABS (the company) and institutional clients, where in exchange for big lumps of money, chainlink labs will cover all the the chainlink network costs using their pre-minted "locked" link all while diluting us (the holders), the institution will also pay for all the chainlink fees in exchange for this. basically, the scale program is "we pay for you using our preminter shitcoins, while you pay us", i've discussed with many team members including coventry, thomas and zach the chainshitgod, and they all agree that cll makes hundreds of millions of $ worth of money through the scale program, and this shit will continue increasing, the DTCC or swift also have private contracts through the company called SmartContract.com which employes 9 employees and sergey is the ceo you can go and search smart contract company on linked in.this fucking company is what funds chainlink labs, and basically this company will also offer the chainlink network for literally FREE to their clients by selling them locked link through agreements made.sergey is smart and a good guy, but he thinks we are dumb fucks, cll and smartcontract.com are acting like they own the network, like it's their private property ...1/2
>>62313866they can sell to their clients using preminted tokens, think about it for a second, it's as if the ethereum foundation covered the eth gas fees of some of their clients if they pay them money (i know that the foundation already steals from corporate they already ask for 8% i believe) but that's not the subject here. i think us linkies we should pressure CLL about this bullshit because they are effectively stealing from the network, and this shit can continue for a looong timmme
>>62313866>>62313871Would you rather have CLL doing nothing like every other crypto project? Atleast they are pulling in institutions and customers and eventually premine will run out
>>62313883if it runs out, they will create another token. linkies will buy it. it will be require "for security reasons"
>>62313883it's me I just switched to my phone, brother, listen at 9$ the total rewards we are getting throught staking (the 4.3% of the 40.8M link staked) is worth 15M$, can't you see that the staking rewards are just a fucking carrot? they are not only stealing from the network (hundreds of millions of $) but also they are diverting some of that money from the stakers through the reserve, they are "buybacking" like 1.1M$ every week of tokens, think about it, there are 52 weeks in a year, so the reserve is getting like 4 times more link than the stakers, they are literally refusing to pay us, they rather store the link in some fake ass "reserve than distribute it to stakers, they give us a total of 15M$ yearly while putting 60M in the reserve and keeping about 340M yearly to themselves.can a fucking company get more greedy than this?
>>62313910also i forgot to mention some of the deals they got like the 1.2% GMX fees they literally memory holed that shit, nobody heard from it since and we don't know where that money is going, add to that the fucking build program, where a project gives em a share of their shitcoin and they also subsidize the network for them using the preminted tokens.the cll company is diverting like more than 100% of the revenue the network genrates by having private deals, and ontop of that using the preminted shitcoins to increase their own company revenue and paying the node operators, i sriously hope an influencer or a journalist or a podcaster sees my posts and fucking shames cl labs so they move their asses and stop taking us fir the stuffed turkey, because they are only giving us the staking rewards so we stfu and keek being the good cucks that we are
>>62313883also let me address the "the premined tokens will runout" i'm sorry i sound like a pro fudder but i'm an INTP i think fucking alot, they won't run out of tokens, xanna know why? because th/'s what the strategic reserve is, can you imagine how smart this is? when they take hundreds of millions of $ through the private deals, they also DCA 1.1 million $ every week rebuying the tokens they used to subsidize, what do you think the reserve is for? it's so they will continue this ponzi forever, like they will take in millions as $, then rebuy some of the tokens basically DCA over years, then redo this shit once their reserve are gonna almost run out, they will use thz reserve by crashing th3 shitcoin and rebuying thzir tokens then say oh the reserves purpose is to subsidize the network and pay for the clients, dont you find it weird that they are already subsidizing the costs and fees for their clients all while having a reserve? they are simply risk managing the tokens running out buy buying low and so the cycle never ends.i dunno why i have never seen such conclusions by any fuddie or linky alike, i dont like the fud but arn't those just facts?
>>62313883>eventually premine will run outwhy is that even relevant?Off the top of my head I can't think of a single crypto whose premine ran out, yet crypto still did what it did.
>>62313910Yea I don’t really understand why stakers aren’t getting paid that money. Even if they stopped the 4% gibs and swapped to paying out what they’re keeping for themselves it 3x’s staking rewards. And the actual system they promised is in place to some degree. Nobody cares if that shit is automated. Just pay our stakers our just dues. We have been staking for what like 5 fucking years for peanuts and watching our portfolio melt? We truly are the cuckolds of crypto.
>>62312614>there would be at least SOME buying pressure from other people in the knowThere is.But then Bitcoin dumps.
>>62314972>bUt ThEn BiTcOiN dUmPs
>>62314977see >>62313738
