Hey guys how are you holding up? Do you want to know the bottom? I made a new updated chart.
bottom will be 40K we dont give a flying fuck about your chart
>>6232343555k eom?
>>62323435are you shizo or something? Just say the numbers in text here, your chart is chaos and i have no idea where is the bottom lolNever understood these logaritmic sharts, its on a level with vegans
>>62323435Why don’t you post the new chart then
>>62323475Bottom will be around 27-30k
>>62323603I wanted to show that I called both the bottom in 2022 and the top in 2025 to establish my credibility, but since everyone's being a jerk I guess won't post it.
>>62323674>im specialvegan confirmed
>>62323674holy fuck anon, nice chart. Btw don't mind those low IQ niggers, we, the TA boys understand how the markets are. Plausible target, I'll keep an eye on it. Currently I'm seeing MVRV-Z and my chart, which gives the bottom at exactly 39.675, but I don't discard lower, especially with these macro environment.I don't work with logarithmic though, I couldn't find a proper way to get price levels.
>>62323674Don't be like that buddy guy fwen. Post it
>>62323674Don't be discouraged and post it I'm interested in your chart
Check this other chart from January 2023 when the bull market had just started.
>>62323674Fag 55 bot eom
>>62323940*End of week
>>62323435nice job
>>62323435>>62323926anon you are a god
the bottom is always higher than the consensus on what the bottom will be, because bulls get in early starting to drive the price, the rest panic thinking they missed the bottom but understand there is margin to be made so they hop on, you buy it when it's going down and people are waiting for it to go down further.the same faggots that were panic buying at 100k are now holding out for 50k, none of this makes sense. we are in a casino where jews always take your money.
you know OP we can see your little tradingview pseudonym on the chart and therefore bypass your shitty threadkys btw
>>62325026>purposely time your buy before it continues droppingLol
I don't think anyone has had a more accurate long term BTC chart than me. Seriously, show me someone who called it as well as I have from 2022. If you were me, how would you make a buck off these charts and the new unpublished versions with updated price targets (aside from trading them ofc)? Would you post them on tradingview or replyguy on twitter and hope people take notice? And then what? Are there businesses or HNWI that would hire me as an "advisor"?https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/42VS8CIR-BTC-Long-View-UPDATE-3/>>62325081Of course I know it. I cropped the screen shot to show it. You don't have the updated chart for next four years though, and the fact everyone's being a dick about it makes me want to post it less.
>>62325126if you are so smart then why aren't you rich?trying to make money from your tradingview drawings?kys brokie
you were actually quite wrongwrong on the timeline and wrong on the pricebrokie
>>62325126id: HOT
>>62325126I was on your side but you’re acting like a butthurt narcissist and frankly like a woman
>>62325164>trying to make money from your tradingview drawings?Trying to. >>62325182I said BTC would top out between Sept 20 and Oct 20 almost a full year before it happened. Before that, in another chart from 2023 when BTC was 22k, I said BTC would top in October of 2025 and that it would be around 130k. I gave the right time and price within reason. We're talking about predictions made years ahead of time.
I knew I had seen these charts before. Pic related was in my bullrun screencap folder. I saved it back in 2022 when BTC was at 42k. I used several different charts and timelines to try to pinpoint the 2025 top, but yours was among the most important ones. So thanks m8
>>62325126>Would you post them on tradingview or replyguy on twitter and hope people take notice? And then what? Are there businesses or HNWI that would hire me as an "advisor"?If you're able to find similar patterns in other financial assets, yes. But most other assets aren't as cyclical as Bitcoin is so it's probably a lot harder, and you've sort of given away your entire prediction formula already. People can look at the charts you've drawn and be able to use your formula to predict the price of Bitcoin 20+ years into the future (if you turn out to be correct), so active advice from you isn't really needed on that front. Followers or people who pay you will want you to give them weekly or monthly updates that they can't calculate on their own, so you've got to hold some information back
Good job OP, I remember when you posted your charts on here back then.But how much did you listen to yourself though? I see on tradingview you commented that you forgot about your own chart
>>62323435Hey OP, everybody's just being a dick because they got blowout on the recent move that was indeed predicted by the chart. Pearls before swine, but I'd really appreciate the chart for the new 4 years. Godspeed and hope you made money.
So my guy what is the chart for the next run looking like then? You are like the only person I have seen being accurate about this.
>>62325359Happy to hear it. >>62325496I don't have or claim to have insider info. The formula has always been public, but nobody seems to use it right. How many 4 year cycle theory guys got blown out? How many of those rainbow chart fags have had to redraw and add new colors to make sense of the PA? I suppose if I have any value to add it's in properly weighing the publicly available info, e.g., making sense of the covid crash, or the fact that BTC made new highs before the halving. The last bit threw many 4-year-cycle theorists off. I talk about it here: https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BLX/VmtyGkHz-When-will-BTC-top-Four-year-cycle-theory-prediction/That said, I think you're right, especially now with the advent of AI. I can imagine people using it to to apply the formula better than I do. >>62325536I forgot I posted THAT specific chart. I was bummed out that the other big one I did (posted above) using the bravenewcoin old chart didn't pan out because tradingview discontinued it in August of 2025, so when you hit Play on the chart, it doesn't show that BTC did in fact top in the red zone. I think its what this anon >>62325182 misunderstood. That said, the 2022 chart (in OP) is gospel in this TG group I post in regularly (along with around 200 other old /biz/ anons). We all (or most) sold in late oct/early nov of 2025 because of it. I'm not shilling the TG, just saying. Some of them are probably here. >>62325653I'll probably put it up on tradingview at some point in the next few days. I was hoping I could figure out a way to make money off it, but I can't think of how to do that. If any anon knows, DM me on tv.
What happens when governments and orgs just stop mining due to low price, will the price just hit 0?
>>62323435With usage of elliot wave theory, believing the 4-year cycle theory and autism I was able to predict the lows and tops of the last two bullruns with 95 % accuracy.Honestly, I do not think there is money to be made with the information. There is too much free content on the web coming to the same conclusion as you. With that accurate prediction you should have enough money anyway.Nevertheless, I would like to take a look at your analysis.
Everyone knows that some anon on biz predicted the top would come in on October 6th based on the 4 year cycle theory and specifically the idea that the top comes in 1064 days from the last bottom.What nobody seems to have figured out is that the October 6th day was WRONG. 1064 days from the last bottom is not October 6th. It's October 20th. The reason that anon got the date wrong (although the day of the top right) is because he looked at the WEEKLY BTC chart and (WRONGLY) began measuring from November 7th, the bottom of the initial wick. He projected 1064 days forward from there on the weekly chart, and the chart showed Oct 6th. The actual bottom in 2022 came in some days later, on Nov 21, but you can only see that if you go to the daily chart. If you project forward 1064 days from Nov 21, you get the October 20 day that I cite in my charts. You can see all this in the pics though it may be a bit confusing if you don't know what I'm talking about. So, tl;dr - the anon who called Oct 6 as the top was right, but he got that number by miscalculating lol. I couldn't believe it when it happened. I used the formula correctly but I was wrong about the exact date of the top because everyone else (those with deep pockets who ultimately matter) used that formula incorrectly in the same way.
ok but what's next then? When's the next bottom and next top in that case?
>>62325359how are you calculating the curve for the bottom.from what I can tell the chart implies that the bottom in 2030 will be lower than the one in 2026.
>>62325718Big if true. Do you have an example of the 95% accuracy? Not saying I don't believe. I'd actually start taking elliot wave theory more seriously. >>62325771I don't think the curves works anymore. It would be crazy if they did, because you're right, it would mean BTC wouldn't make any new highs and start making new lows. It would mean it's dead, basically. >>62325750I'll post it in a few days, unless some HNWI anon has a better idea. But to be clear, I'm not guaranteeing anything. I don't know what I'm doing. I don't have any degrees in Chartology. Not a financial advisor.
>>62323435This chart shows an arc with bitcoin having peaked and we will soon enter a gradual decline to 0
>>62325816Pretty much this
>>62325816>>62326987Everyone who wanted to buy bitcoin already bought bitcoin, and there is still no usecase besides gambling. There are simply no new fools to sell bags to, and the increasingly difficult K-shaped macroeconomic conditions are preventing would-be greater fools from buying in
>>62325816>>62326987Further, a larger percentage of what's owned is by institutions and whales like Saylor, there's frankly less retail even IN the casino then previous cycles. Too many altcoins was the nail in the coffin. The whole thing is a fugazi that is doomed to collapse to 0 long-term
>>62327060put your money where your mouth is and short it to zero then
>>62327080I said long-term dummie, there will be volatility and bull/bear cycles along the way. We're talking about OP chart here retard
so whats the tg
so, again, when is the bottom and next top, or do you not know?
>>62323435Let me know the bottom and next ATH please.
Ok I bought a chunk at 60kAm I going to be rich or what?
please respond
oh yes yes the 'buyback cicle graph' that needs to be show everytime it shit itself so ""investors"" act and buy back so they dont feel like lost money. lol.
>>62323435Yes, I want to know the bottom...
>>62328668no one cares about you mate, kys
>>62328702alright
OP removed his picturehe plans a bottom in november 2026 between 30 and 39K and a top 3 years later at 170Kyou can kys now OP no one care about your charts
you are the most typical tradingview idea "content" creator thinking that because he drew 2 lines on a chart he deserves millions of euros in his bank accountif you believed so much in your chart and you followed your own plan then why are you begging for donations for your drawing?dont tell me you didnt buy 15K and sold 125K? oh no no no AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>62323871Just one more line bro
>>62328726>he plans a bottom in november 2026 between 30 and 39K and a top 3 years later at 170KIncorrect
>>62328914Looking forward to the new chart. I actually followed your previous one and it panned out pretty well. Are you strictly a btc guy or do you also diversify in stocks and pms etc?
>>62323475Even if bottom is 10K I'm not selling, I staked some of my BTC on babylon already and kept the rest on cold wallet
>>62329085it's on warosuwarosu.org/biz/thread/62323435#p62328668
>>62328914correct
btw this is my chart, i created it 2 hours agodo you want to buy it from me?
>>62329388sure mateso when you see the local bottom 2026/2027?
>>62329409november 2026 around 35K
>>62329428was think kinda similar. thanks fren!>start slowly dca when its tiem!
>>62323435the bottom is not a price, but a date
>>62329085I chart all kinds of stuff with the other /biz/ anons on tg. Here's gold from some time ago. New 4 year cycle chart is up. https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/4Vna2vOv-BTC-The-Next-4-Year-Cycle/
>>62329957Can you share what your investment portfolio is split between? Just curious how you're managing risk. Guessing the biggest returns are banked on crypto
thank you for your knowledge OP, such insights deserve a million dollar in your bank accountcan i suck your dick and swallow your sperm too?
>>62323435This lines up to what I am thinking
>>62330978>11 posts by this idThe psychotic anon that kept this thread alive has now started ANOTHER thread to popularize my chart. I appreciate it bro. You don't have to swallow. Whatever you're doing is alright.
>>62331690Maybe he just likes spreading misinformation
If I don't get 3.3k gold I'm gonna be very cross with you Friedrich
>ITT: heathens disbelieving the one true prophetYOU DON'T DESERVE TO DRINK AT HIS MAJESTIC FOUNTAIN AND SWALLOW HIS KNOWLEDGE!
>>62331872I don't know how low it goes. I was just saying that 4880-4980 was a good short setup because the r/r looked great. Idk what happens now. If you took this trade at 4800, I'd take some profit. I certainly wouldn't short here of all places. A lot of the move already happened.
