>Mythos
so a scam, ok got it

its because the bitcoin developers dont add anything, the code has barely changed.

honestly it's quite mysterious.

no shit nigga it's like 600 lines of Dino code

epstein

it's a more of a protocol than a software
keep it simple and nothing breaks. make a solid foundation before you build the empire state building on top of it, ect.

But a lot of defi protocols will 100% get exploited in the coming weeks

>>62339891
source? no search engine results

It's actually that bitcoin is too simple, the more complexity you add the more likely you get a vulnerability.

>>62340131
Robert Kiyosaki? You read rich dad poor dad?

>>62340196
Too simple how?

File: e9751cc10d03d66cfe4743a12(...).jpg (83 KB, 1200x630)

83 KB JPG

>>62339891
>security researchers find out when you dont add backdoors in everything there are no security issues

>>62340255
It's not got any smart contracts or other bullshit tacked onto it

>>62340196
Only real risk would be if AI somehow finds a way to reverse sha256 right? Though presumably bitcoin would get forked pretty fast in that case with a new algorithm

>>62339891
You cant just look at software and say impenetrable with no deep dive into hardware...and even if you did all the errata are not known.

>>62340196
>too simple
Ranjeesh, simple is good. Get this through your shitty code held together with sticky tape and staples.