I still keep seeing link threads on here in 2026. read this and just let it go. please tell me you guys are just bored or being ironic
>>62348444CheckedIt's a shame your trips were wasted on this seething
>>62348446your stupid coin will never go up
>>62348444>ai sloplazy fuddie
>>62348461find the slop part
>>62348456You don't hold anything apparently and instead of trading spend your time coaxing chatgpt into writing you fud to spam /biz/ with It's very obvious that the only non-fud link thread on the board has riled you up
>>62348444We've moved on from link, this is a DOT board now
>>62348496lol it doesn't matter where the info comes from. it's complete facts. of course, I dont own link. ok so explain what me and chatgpt dont grasp. amaze me
>>62348468Lower your tone simpleton you're talking to a human now
>>62348509please tell me your being ironic right now
>>62348507Here you go>>62346445
>>62348520Why would I be? You are an ai fud piggie
>>62348542the ai is literally spitting facts. how does that invalidate anything
>>62348526As the use goes up more and more get soold
>>62348551>spitting factsok negro if you sat so
>>62348557This is fud tranny math dressed up as economics, and it falls apart on contact.**The MV=PQ framing is fake rigor.** The equation of exchange describes a medium with zero holding demand. LINK demonstrably has holding demand: staking is live, node operators post collateral, and the staking pool fills to capacity within hours of opening. You cannot claim "near-infinite velocity" about a token that millions of units are locked into by design. The author is applying a model whose core assumption is falsified by on-chain data anyone can check.**The "operators dump everything" story invents its own numbers.** Server and cloud costs are a fraction of node revenue. Operators on a functioning network sell to cover costs and keep the margin, and every token they sell was bought by a user to pay for the service in the first place. Usage-driven selling that is preceded by usage-driven buying is circulation, not a death spiral. Calling flow-through "massive immediate liquidations" is just dramatic vocabulary doing the work the argument can't.**The Payment Abstraction point refutes itself.** If institutional fiat is auto-converted, then by the author's own description every enterprise payment generates a LINK buy first. Worse for the thesis: a portion of those fees routes to the staking pool, meaning usage directly pays holders. That is the value accrual mechanism the post claims doesn't exist, sitting inside the post.**"Inflationary staking rewards" is flatly wrong.** LINK has a hardcoded 1 billion cap. There is no inflation. Rewards come from a fixed allocation and fees. If you get the supply mechanics of the asset wrong, your supply-pressure thesis is dead on arrival.**"Permanent mathematical ceiling" is not math, it's a vibe.** Nothing in MV=PQ produces a ceiling once you admit speculative demand, lockups, and fee accrual exist, and all three demonstrably do.
>>62348444if modern economics have taught me anything, its that the math doesn't matter.
>>62348557There weren't any characters left but chatgpt also said you are a gay nigger
>>62348588Every single LINK token used to pay for a data feed or CCIP message is destined to be handed to a node or a staker, who will ultimately sell it back onto the market. The more it's being used the more it get's sold. if you still believe in it why hasn't it happened by now? what are u even waiting for to happen
>>62348588What special thing are you waiting for in order to convert how much it's being used into increased price and why hasn't it happend by now?
>>62348610>>62348620The answer is covered in this thread, but you're a disingenuous fuddie loser who isn't really interested in the answer>>62346445
>>62348638why dont u explain the thread in 3 sentences and show me how stupid I am right here
>>62348667Why don't you ask chatgpt to read it and explain it to you like the retard you are
>>62348676I want you to explain it. show me how stupid I am. tell me why the special even hasn't happened by now
>>62348689Nobody cares what you want
>>62348701why are you in my thread
>>62348706>Here's some ai slop I had to coax together>Prove me wrong>No don't link me to the answer>why are you in my thread
>>62348723your just mad because the ai was right. find me the slop part of it
>>62348733>>62348588>>62346445
>>62348444All of these are lies designed to trick me into selling my Link tokens before it reaches mass adoption therefore I won't read that.
I’m just comfy waiting for it to hit 15 cents again so I can gigaslurp.
I just keep DCA'ing HAHAHAHA
>>62350910>I just keep lighting my money on fire HAHAHAHAmental illness
>>62350910happy for you cuck but just dont annoy us here with your shitlink problems
>>62348468Cloud infrastructure = servers + electricity. The fact these are noted as 3 separate things just to pad the text is a strong slop indicator. Didn't bother reading the rest.
>>62353646seethe stinkoidmaybe if you bothered to separate things out more you wouldn't be bag holding worthless stinkies right now
>>62350910lil niggy receiving literal negative returns on investment when hitting the casino has astronomically better odds at this point
