>>62354107
>"Kissass machine, confirm my biases for me."

That conclusion doesn't really follow from the premises.

A few issues:

SpaceX isn't publicly traded. There is no public SpaceX IPO at the moment, so there isn't an IPO event from which investors can directly "dump" shares and then rotate capital back into Bitcoin.
Even if there were a major IPO, capital flows are not one-to-one. Investors who sell one asset don't automatically buy Bitcoin. They might:
Hold cash
Buy other stocks
Buy bonds
Invest in private markets
Buy crypto (including Bitcoin)
Bitcoin's short-term moves are driven by many factors. Things like ETF inflows/outflows, macroeconomic news, interest-rate expectations, leverage positioning, options expiries, and overall risk sentiment often have a larger impact on a next-day move than any single equity event.
"Everyone who wanted to dump already dumped" is hard to verify. Markets rarely provide certainty that all sellers are exhausted. Sometimes apparent seller exhaustion precedes a rally; other times new sellers emerge.

Your statement is essentially a bullish thesis:

If a large pool of investors recently sold assets to prepare for a liquidity event, and that event is now behind them, some of that capital could rotate back into risk assets such as Bitcoin.

That's a plausible scenario, but it's not enough to conclude that Bitcoin will go up tomorrow. At best, it would be one potential bullish factor among many.

>>62354130
probably using Deep Seek or something