[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: Michael_Saylor_2022.png (94 KB, 250x290)
94 KB PNG
>I said to YOU to never sell your Bitcoin. I never said that the company wouldn’t sell its Bitcoin.
TOP FUCKING KEK HE ACTUALLY SAID IT
>>
BOOOOOOOOOOM
>>
>>62354767
For the newfags. When he said not sell, he means don't let other countries get the supply. He has to sell in his company though, because thats how it works
>>
>>62354767
It's possible that he always picked his phrasing and context carefully to only imply but not state overtly that the company would NEVER sell.

Dude obviously can't speak for the very long term of 100, 50, even 20 years because he won't be running the company then.
His "BTC will only ever go up for the next 100 years like Manhattan real estate" analogies are likewise obviously wishful thinking, the whole market could already get saturated and stop growing in 5 to 10 years. We've had decades of asset inflation, but there could some sort of monetary/debt reset in the next decades that reduces the significance of inflation hedges, and then these things won't be moving the same at all anymore.

Anyway, regardless of what was claimed or implied, the preferred shares introduced last year sold fairly well so far because the company is BTC-backed. Having BTC on the balance sheet subjects it to numerous financial and legal realities, you can't just pretend it doesn't exist when the company needs money.

Today is a great day for anti-Strategy posters because unlike 99% of the usual empty "ponzi/house of cards collapsing/Saylor is done/always knew this would fail/look at those UNREALIZED LOSSES OMG" content, the contradiction being criticized here does exist to some extent. But still even on this fantastic winning day you're only pointing out the obvious that yes, BTC on a company's balance sheet is part of that company's assets and thus subject to selling if needed. And you're kind of contradicting the ponzi narrative.
>>
Based
>>
>>62354767
He also said volatility is a feature. This clown will be definition of why i can't take this industry seriously.

>kek baggies.
>>
>>62354767
unironically over for saylor
>>
>>62355253
He shorted his own stock and dumped it and then it never recovered. If the stupid cunt left well enough alone bitcoin would have hit 200k by this time last year and MSTR would be trading at 2000 bucks.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.