SpaceX lost 5 billion in 2025
no one likes losers go with the program nigga
>>62359048profitability and growth don't actually matter anymore.
>b-but the numbers and the fundamentals ok unc
>>62359048The financials of the underlying business don't matter. The actual product is the stock
>>62359048>SpaceX lost 5 billion in 2025Shut up nerd
>>62359172Profitable companies by the people, off the people, for the people.....But the people are retarded...
>>62359048Profits don’t matter, retard. I’m guaranteed to be a mars colonist now. No browns allowed btw
>>62359048Intelligent investors are thinking 5-10 years into the future. Today means jack shit
>>62359410in 5-10 years they will be losing 50 billion dollars a year instead of 5.
profits lmao, you retards still think your fundamentals matter in this clown world, you really don't understand what's happening, still clinging to irrelevant anchors like profit, if profit mattered why is tesla still breathing, companies like uber and amazon spend a decade not making profit and you think it's relevant for spacex
>>62359145so it's a memecoin basically?
>>62359428Congrats on being mentally challenged
>>62359472A memecoin that will collapse the US economy, yes.
>>62359484the situation really is that bad?
>>62359048They have a monopoly on space access. If there's ever a company where profitability is irrelevant, it's this one.
>>62359601if their "monopoly" was worth 1.7 trillion then they wouldn't be making only 18 billion a year and operating at a massive net loss.
>>62359661>he doesn't see the inherent value in a company with a global monopoly on space deliverylol retard
>>62359481A million robotaxis on the road by 2022 trust the process
>>62359048Its a grift. Its all about going to Mars. He's going to use all the money to send people to Mars where they will do absolutely nothing, make absolutely no money and for what? To fulfill his childhood dream? That's all this is about. SpaceX will never make money and Elon is now going to use all of the investment to put people on Mars for literally no good reason.
>>62359691They don't even have a monopoly. There are other space companies. United launch alliance, RocketLab, some Chinese ones.
>>62359472Yes.
>>62359504it's the pets.com of this bubble
>>62359785Many people I have spoken too IRL think that the Artemis mission used SpaceX equipment when it didn't. Their only real ability in space is cheaply launching satellites into low earth orbit, which is really cool, but is kind of niche. It's very similar to Tesla. Like it's a real space company, but it isn't even the leading one.
>>62359785>>62359814>they launch more satellites than the entire globe combined>they don't have a monopolyholy cope, you retards are sad
>>62359932words have meanings
>>62359973and reddit is that way >>> seething fag
>>62359083they are still acting as if interned doesnt existdoing same shit they did for last half of century and nobody calls them out about it
>>62359661gotta spend money to make money
>>62359814>Like it's a real space company, but it isn't even the leading one.kekaroo
how about you shut your whore mouth>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFBWfPQpGXc
>>62361758what comes after X? exactly
>>62359770It's worse. He's going to use the money to build data centers
>>62359992You're the only one that's seething
>>62359472Literally.
>>62363565>seethingyou resurrected a dead thread for this?
>>62359315Imagine the smell of an Elon Musk H1B Mars colony.
>>62359048Sandisk only recently started to make positive profits, but it remains the most pumped and roided AI-related stock to date. What investors think will happen dwarfs actual profits.
>>62363570I guess so
>>62359932>>62360514They launch satellites into low earth orbit, and when they do geostationary satellites as their rockets are not reusable for such a launch they don't have a meaningful competitive advantage. This is like someone believing that because Cessna makes the most planes it is much more important than Lockheed, Airbus and Boeing in airspace and valuing it greater than the rest of the industry. These types of launches are not substitutable services.
dude needs to calm down on the botox
>>62359814It is definitely the leading space company no one comes even closeIs it worth 2 trillion dollars? Now that’s a different question
>>62363580but i am the one seething?>>62363591no other rocket is reusable at that scale either, so your argument is retarded, the value of the satellites is higher than what the rest of the industry puts out, maybe try a better analogy next time
>>62359048you have 2 children. both ask you for $10,000 which is all you have. assume no splitting 5k each. it's all or nothing to only one.child 1: plumber. 60k a year. no debt. average expenses. married another working class woman. child 2: med student. no income. high debt. low expenses. single.child1 low p/e. child 2 high p/e. which one do you invest in? moral of the story is do not be too afraid of high p/e companies.
>>62363616i would invest in the son getting laid, proven to be straight and whose job can't be replaced by AI, obviously
>>62359048People will pile in until massive cash-out occurs. Just have to time and know when to take profits. I took mine day 1
>>62363616Eldest
>>62363609It is only a reusable rocket for low earth orbit and doesn't work with a larger payload. They pretty much nailed down the tech in 2015 and haven't really improved since. The Falcon Heavy isn't even reusable, while the New Glenn is. Not that either has that many launches. It seems to suffer from the same issue as Tesla. With it pretty much having the absolute best tech of 2015, but slowly falling behind everyone else in the past ten years. I wonder how starlink will even hold up when Amazon Leo comes online this fall. Leo is in slightly higher orbit, as again SpaceX's whole thing is cheap low orbit, so low that decay is a big factor.
>>62359770>It's a griftLmao. You libtards learned one word 5 years ago and now it's all you can say.
>>62363724new glenn won't launch this fall lmao, they have to report what caused the explosion which might take months, and there's also rebuilding but starship will definately demonstrate chopstick catching before new glenn
>>62363744New Glenn has already performed an upright landing anon.
>>62359048>It doesnt even make profitsIt runs on pure hope-ium
>>62363764so has spacex, it doesn't mean it's ready to launch again compared to spacex
>>62363780But SpaceX pricing assumes a monopoly, when it's only reliable rocket, the falcon 9 doesn't hit the performance specifications of traditional rocket providers and is only a few percent cheaper than (still more precise) Japanese and Indian rockets.
>>62363792>performance specificationslmao, that's irrelevant, what matters is it's reliability, reusability and launch cadence, they are called traditional rockets for a reason, they can't keep up
>>62359785None of which can compete with SpaceX on cost or launch cadence. Maybe in a few years others will catch up to F9/FH, but by then Starship will be ahead of them all again. All the while Starlink is printing money.
>>62363796Precisely placing payloads is very important for pretty much everything else you fire into space except internet constellations. Also keep in mind that for geosynchronous orbit the Falcon 9 isn't reusable and so the cost is higher than the Jeet and Nip rockets.
>>62363814again, those geosynchronous satellites don't matter, their value is negligible compared to what spacex puts out, they are not even that popular since newer designs are getting smaller, unless new glenn demonstrates falcon 9 cadence and start putting them out, spacex will remain the monopoly
>>62363829What exactly are you valuing SpaceX based on here? It is worse at supplying space missions. It is worse at launching satellites above low earth orbit, and it's low earth lead is decreasing by the year, currently standing at 5% cheaper per kg, with a shrinking margin. It is no longer the only company that can land vertically, but now it no longer even has the largest rocket that can land vertically. Do you believe that Starlink will be a $2 trillion dollar company and no other company will emerge, despite the technology to launch satellites into low earth orbit with entirely domestic parts being something even Iran appears to be capable of?
>>62363895they have manned flights already validated, new glenn doesn't, they have the most reliable rocket on the planet, they have 10 million customers and growing and they have the largest reusable rocket coming online soon, no other competitor has these stats yet, you can speculate about them achieving this and i can speculate about them remaining a monopoly as well, or being the only company that could reliably supply moon missions in the future, the difference is that spacex already has the first listed achievements while your speculations are yet to come true
>>62363905You have to assume that Rocket lab, Relativity Space, ULA, and Blue Origin will also all fail. And that all the other foreign rockets will fail in that situation. Keep in mind that both Rocket Lab and ULA have consistently had no issue delivering payloads to the moon. ULA and Rocket Lab are burning the current Space X offerings at both ends on the lunar payload front, so it's entirely betting on Starship and Starship not having competition, presumably for two decades.
>>62359048only boomers and trannies care about fundamentals
