Most billionaires' money comes from them running companies that do billions in profit. Buffett does 70B/year, the Google guys do 139B/year, Pony Ma of Tencent does 35B/year, etc. Elon Doesn't do this. The Musk Empire collectively LOSES money, and this is after it has had 20+ years to get it together. What's going on here is VCs like Marc Andreesen and the Saudis, as well as similar-minded retail investors, are throwing money at Elon because he looks like the kind of alpha male they think should be running the sector. In a world where real tech companies are run by "icky" Chinese and Indian nerds, Elon looks the part better. He makes investors feel good, they give him money, so the capital bonfires continue.https://youtu.be/mNw6sWNcvVs
>>62369766sorry anon, it's over
>>62369808Elon's career of pole dancing for right wing chud money is FAR from over.
lmao, are you going to be doing this everyday, you know there are billionaires who tried to short tesla and kept failing, but you think your shitposting is meaningful
>>62369766Collab with his underwear model daughter when?
Elon derangement syndrome
I can't imagine what goes through the minds of people who are perfectly happy with George Soros making billions from ruining economies and flooding countries with third worlders, but throw a hissy fit because people want to invest in Musk's companies because they are one of the few tech firms that actually innovate. Bewildering. Maybe you'd be happier on reddit?
>>62369920there is serious (jew) money propping up tsla and spcx. in a normal world they would have mcap of low billions
>>62369920Tesla's behind the NASDAQ-100 (i.e. its peer group) over the last five years in terms of total returns.>>62369925I could unironcially see Elon Musk becoming a porn producer. BTW OnlyFans generates more profit than the Musk empire.>>62370109George Soros barely has any influence on anything and two feet from the death bed, trotting him out as a boogeyman in discussions about Elon's corruption is a joke.>>62370202His trillion dollar net worth does help to divert peoples' attention from the overall ethnic composition of the Forbes list top 10. Could this be on purpose?
>>62370259>over the last five years in terms of total returns.that doesn't mean anything, uber and amazon run a loss for more than 10 years, uber for 9
>>62370337>that doesn't mean anything, uber and amazon run a loss for more than 10 years, uber for 9Did they ever actually shrink and lose market share like Tesla has done in recent quarters though?