This will be one of the greatest investment opportunities in our lifetime within another decade or so. Tech is stagnating, just as every other industry is out of viable optimization methodologies. There is nothing new being created, every niche is saturated and optimized. AI will produce some value but it is ultimately a giant bubble that will never, and I mean never advance to the point of consciousness or intelligence (unless they use biological brains and do so correctly - they will fail). Science doesn't even know where consciousness comes. That being said: sex robots and eventual artificial womb tech (much easier than actually creating consciousness) will be the big new technology that solves real world problems. And the funny thing is: tech companies will eventually run out of other means of generating increasing revenue and will essentially HAVE to go this route, just like they're currently doing with AI. They have nothing else. This technology will have vast and continuous demand as it will entirely replace the old/current paradigm.
>>62375553I want sexbots to be real so bad
>>62375864sameall the despair, pain and unhappiness i feel... if it was a good sexbot i would be happy.the thing is, the first sexbots will be bad. like truly awful. probably not physically dangerous... maybe. but not enjoyable. like how electric masturbators are really good at making me nut, but a soulless experience that leaves me feeling empty. the technology to replace a living organism with a robot is just not there.if it were viable, there would be news. most people who are lonely and horny want the sexbot. but porn and masturbators are the best we have. sexbots are an AI complete problem.
>>62375553>sex robots and eventual artificial womb tech (much easier than actually creating consciousness)AI is not about creating consciousness. you are retarded if you think intelligence requires consciousness.
>>62375977"AI" is just a number of algos operating within a matrix of data to produce output similar to some complex bot. AI is NOT intelligent, it is a pseudo-thinking automation. >When faced with novel scenarios that deviate from training patterns (e.g., a simple detour in a known city map), these systems often fail spectacularly, revealing they lack a coherent mental model of reality.consciousness, or something tantamount to it, is the only thing that can transform AI from rote, confined calculation machines into actual thinking machines. Scientists will never be able to replicate this.
>>62375553Fetuses grown in artificial wombs will be stunted in ways we won't fully appreciate until they're born. They won't hear their mother's voice or her heartbeat. They won't hear their father's voice, either. They won't hear anyone. Only the click and whine of machines, the droning gurgle of synthetic embryonic fluids. Grown like lab rats by scientists that see them as a commodity. I shudder at the thought.>entire crops were lost
>>62376404Sorry, did I say born? I mean dispensed
>>62375553Nah just give me ai glasses that tell you if a girl is interested so we can stop this annoying boomer "read the room" nonsense. That's all I ask. Would save us all a lot of time and embarrassment too.
