[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam folder!


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: IMG_8928.jpg (28 KB, 378x529)
28 KB JPG
If you’ve held Chainlink for years, ask yourself what you’ve been waiting for.

LINK is a $5.7B token on $57.5M of annual fees. That’s ~99x revenue, and it has been flat for years, straight through every “banks are coming” cycle. The promise was always that adoption converts into value. It hasn’t. It’s been “soon” since 2020.

So here’s the question no diehard wants to answer:

What fee number, by what date, would make you sell? If LINK still earns ~$57M in 2028, is the thesis wrong, or is it still “soon”? If you can’t name the number and the date, you’re not investing in Chainlink. You’re believing in it. And belief has no exit.
>>
never. Its not about the link token, its just about the hope for the future it gives. That is what keeps me going, even if its a delusion. Thus I will never sell, because as long as I hold the token that fantastical delusion can still be real in my mind
>>
chatgpt post
>>
>>62382842
OP is a mentally ill faggot
>>
LINK will never be above $20 again. You missed your chance.
>>
Ok, I'm just not going to sell tho.
>>
>>62383127
$20 is a 2.5x from here
Not only that, that's barely 20 billion extra in MC
The upside potential of link is monstrous, swingies get the fucking rope
>>
>>62383132
Bro cmon. I should had sold everything at 40, even 30 and forget about link forever.
>>
>>62382813
Do one for spacex for us now please
Ahahahahahhaha
>>
>>62382842
>>62382990
This
>>
>>62382813
Is it a good time to buy yet or not? We have been trying to decide for years
>>
>>62383132
Overused buzzwords, here a few more
>the price is bad because they are supressing it not because i picked an underperforming asset
>lol it's a cult of course i ignore any rationale that goes against sergey
>staking is already live
>ok yeah the fees are going to cll instead of stakers but they're doing buy backs
>sure they dump 17 million tokens and rebuy 100k of them, but buybacks man
>yeah swift and dtcc are going live without the "necessary" decentralized oracle network, but they will totally need it later on for some reason
>>
I want a linkmarine to ram my pussy
>>
>>62383255
Post your holdings and your hand
>>
I'm selling in 2028/2029. I still remember back in 2021 when LINK was $45 and I kept debating with myself whether to sell or not and decided not to. That shit is going to haunt me for the rest of my life.
>>
File: 1771357330046752.png (84 KB, 909x886)
84 KB PNG
>>62383255
>>the price is bad because they are supressing it
yes, see pic

>>sure they dump 17 million tokens and rebuy 100k of them
We've known about the supply unlocks for 9 years, we've known about the buybacks for less than a year

>swift and dtcc are going live without the "necessary" decentralized oracle network
Every single Chainlink product uses the decentralized oracle network. What a bizarre thing to just lie about.
>>
>>62383263
>no i totally don't hold the token, i just know everything about it to more accuratelly fud
*cries in third world*
>>
>>62383267
>the switch bro's, the switch is flipped
>surely the price must be pushing higher from all these onchain buy fees towards the link token
>wait
>why is everything a cash deal between that company and cll
>why is cll paying their own nodes
>>
>>62383274
>>why is cll paying their own nodes
Because cll runs the contract.

Holy shit you're retarded
>>
>>62383275
You see this lurkers? Another layer of cope comes forth.
>>
>>62383279
I love how you always pretend you have this huge silent audience. This board is dead, maybe 15 people will ever see your posts, and 14 of them will instantly know you're a clueless retard.
>>
>>62383287
I love how you always pretend you have this answer for brownian motion. This board is an echo chamber, maybe 15 people will ever see your posts, and 14 of them will instantly know you're the same as them.
>>
>>62383291
>same as them
>same skin color as them
Sorry, I want to add that to the end of my post. Makes it way funnier.
>>
File: IMG_3200.jpg (89 KB, 857x1200)
89 KB JPG
Ram my pussy bitches
>>
>>62383299
Sorry femanon, the marines have been beating their dicks senseless to anime jpegs for years. I don't think they can keep it up for a real woman. They'll probably cum too fast and watch some bull finish you.
>>
>>62382813
I'v been waiting for SWIFT, DTCC, and the whole banking system to come online with tokenization using Chainlink, just like everyone else has. And we're very close, anon. Can you smell it? Smell it.
>>
>>62383932
I can smell your poverty kek
>>
>>62383312
Now this is some real fuddie cuck fanfiction. Bravo.
>>
>>62387313
Link marines are unironic cuckolds who get off seeing Sergey dump hundreds of millions of tokens on Binance. They've been waiting 9 years for their "real life" to begin kek
>>
>>62383932
This. Just 2 more years and we will all make it
>>
File: 1516231870035.png (107 KB, 444x444)
107 KB PNG
>>62382813
I've been holding since september or november 2017, bought at 30c average sold 2/3 of my original stack between $38 and $12, still holding the rest, but there is nobody I despise more than idiots defending "the team" and coping, I know many of you retards bought at $5 or even higher and are sweating right now, and that's a good thing, you don't deserve anything better than the current price action. Instead of giving Chainlink the heat they deserve you idiots defend them. At least cocksuckers like that chainlinkgod retard or the catfishy catfish idiot get paid for doing damage control, but you absolute miserable fucks do it for free
>>
>>62382825
the memories of defi summer are still fresh in my mind. we really had fun, didn't we
>>
In all these years nobody could ever explain what Chainlink is even supposed to be doing without the explanation devolving into a buzzword ouroboros.
>>
>>62382825
I just wish you would discuss your beanie babies somewhere else
>>
>>62387778
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hR4rDbJPM4
>>
>>62387876
Stop making threads then
>>
>>62387912
I have made as many threads about the topic as chainlink has intrinsic value. (0)
>>
>>62387714
You sound pretty angry.
>>
Let's be honest. You'd do the same in Sergeys position. Some annoying faggots that won't shut the fuck up online shitting up your nice official social media posts for years on end?

Yeah it is absolutely unfair that these crypto companies get away with basically fucking over retail by offering stocks with 0 of the benefits and protections of being a stockholder but you'd absolutely do the same in his position keeping your cards close since you can since nothing is forcing you to give any information out. Project seems to be in a good place but we all expected an eth run in 2021 and never got it and been absolutely destroyed for 5 straight years. Every day for me I wake up and I hate my dumb fucking life but I'll still kys before I ever sell
>>
>>62388115
>it is absolutely unfair that these crypto companies get away with basically fucking over retail by offering stocks with 0 of the benefits and protections of being a stockholder
so why didn't you buy stocks instead? Are you some kind of retard?
>>
>>62387778
It's got the fastest tps and it's going to replace swift (kaboom)
>>
>>62382813
First time recently I have sold link in over years.
All the trades I did recently outperformed my LINK holdings for the past 5 years, it's been time I let it go, at this point I have more hope for Eth than LINK.
>>
>>62388115
They deserves 1000x worse. How about they square up their tokenomics, respect their own truth > trust ethos, and close up their Cayman office now that Clarity is all but signed? As you said, their hands are deep in the honey pot. Like everything happening in the West, people complain a bit and do absolutely nothing, so they continue while payrolling their Wumao dogs like clg and swathes of barely obfuscated LINK-branded bot accounts to induce apathy.
>>
>>62382813
>belief has no exit.
belief. has. no. exit.
Go Sergey!
Also watch July and October because DTCC, Swift, and Clarity Act are all doing big things this year
>>
>>62382813
I dumped for BTC already, fuck LINK. All I do now is buy more BTC, stake some and might lend out some when TBV comes live to get liquidity that's it, no more altcoins



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.