What does mean realistically? Imminent death spiral?
>>62384217You weren't meant to live an uncomfortable life.
Saylor basically created a tradfi version of LUNA, lmao
>>62384217nobody seems to understand that this will take bitcoin to the dark ages once they start mass selling to keep the stock afloat
>>62384217my best friend's biggest position is strategyI inversed him and made it my biggest shortfeels good desu but I have nobody to brag to about my gains other than biz anons
It manes michael has to find progressively dumber and dumber places to shill it. >omg guy look at this 20% yield!
>>62384240Realistically what will happen is Saylor offloads like $10B worth of BTC to secure dividend funding and being able to roll over upcoming debt, which will cause a giga nuke and mark the bottom of the bear
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
>>62384252everyone is still talking about cycles etc while they completely miss this time bomb that will cause the biggest dump ever seen in the history of crypto, effectively killing it.
Its a free +15% +yield realistically. Not good enough for moonboys tho
>>62384266>free yield on an asset that has a decent chance of entering a death spiral
>>62384266>15% yield with no more money flowing in to pay the divviesREFINANCE WHERE SAYLOR
it's over.
every single support level has broken and there's nothing holding this shit up below it's unironically over.
>>62384405Dont underestimate the power of positive thinking…
>>62384217$83 with no support in sight
>>62384422>positive thinking…yes we all hope for it to be over with tragedy
I have about 1% of my port in btci and and a bdc etf. They are both competing hard for dirtiest baggie, but if mstr folds the winner will be undisputed.
>>62384217It's fine, he just has to raise the dividend is all. Of course that will raise the debt obligation but he can just sell btc to cover. Or refi of course
>>62384323oh sweet summer child
uh oh
>>62384236you essentially don't understand what Luna did lolthat makes you specially vulnerable to getting duped by the next Luna lmao
>>62386022...is he shilling for strc? Because that is what it reads like
>>62386031they waited for him to tweet lmaothere's literally no way it's a fucking coincidence
>>62386027I was one of the few people on /biz/ who actually shorted it from its 60s. Nice try though, idiot
>>62385854Your highlighted bottoms took place in a low interest rate growth cycle. We are now entering a high interest rate stagnation. How will it perform then? There is no history
>>62386301>muh interest ratethey are printing trillions of dollars every year u dumb nigger.
>>62386301higher interest rates = they cannot service the debt = forced to cut eventuallymarkets are forward looking
>>62384217>stock never goes above $100>short at $100>guaranteed profit
