>Embrace AI or die Skynet here we go
You WILL justify our capital expenditures.
>>62388502I mean this was always going to happen. Ai isn't going to replace everyone since it needs babysitters to make sure things are running correctly
>>62388508Basically >>62388560So if it doesn’t replace people (no cost cutting benefit) all you did is spend a ton of money with nothing to show for it
>>62388569even worse, they axed all their junior employees and invested in a chatbot instead of the future, so institutional rot and collapse from incompetence is now guaranteed
>>62388584what if they hired a bunch of wfh interns for half the cost
>>62388584That's exactly what I was thinkingZoomer tech worker:>bot says we should take on this business strategy>presents bullet list of outputs from ai promptOlder business partner:>hey I don't think that'll work and here's why:>lists pragmatic and logistical concerns left out of ai bullet listResult:>old partner ousted with retirement package>business now competing with 6 other firms doing the EXACT same strategy shat out by the ai clusterI see something akin to this happening very soonOver/under on how many fortune 100 companies get consolidated on the altar of technocratic hubris?
We'll just consoom our way out of the problems caused by overconsumption. Simple as
>>62388584it's the american wayamericans literally just destroy themselves in every way possible and blame everyone but themselves for putting psychopathic satanists in power and rotting everything around themgood fucking riddance, at least the rest of us won't have to deal with their meddling anymore, hope the death of the empire is slow and painful
>>62388584So when the senior people retire who will assume their role if juniors were never hired? Boomers are so fucking short sighted and self serving it's insane.
The company I work for is pushing AI but the first thing they mentioned in the training was "Copilot Credits" and how IT is going to bill every department directly for usage. So I guess I will get fired if I don't use AI and also fired if I use it too much? I don't even have a company credit card but now my responsibilities will involve managing expenses incurred from doing my own work in the way I was told to do it.
>>62388781The solution is simple. Bullshit the delusional executives above that you are using AI, while touching it no more than the bare minimum.That's at least the short term solution.
>>62388793At my job I ask it one really complex prompt at night and have it burn through tokens while I am sleeping. During our weekly meetings they actually (positively) called me out on leading AI usage lmao
Software solutions were also being pushed on everyone and everywhere even if at times they had the tendency to just overcomplicate stuff. I remember when my company introduced software to handle requests for paid leave and other HR stuff. This was the most retarded interface ever created and it was so painfully slow to fill (not to mention crashes and errors). Just telling your superior to bring you a printed paper and filling it was much faster. But it didn't end here. Later it got integrated in their retarded app that had to be installed by everyone (which also meant you had to own an Android or Apple device). So it's not surprising that AI will be shoved down our throats. But I will not shed a tear for the software guys. SCREW YOU and SCREW the AI software you've created.
>>62388805Well, your mangers are very likely retarded.There is so much that will go wrong with this AI craze - all because greedy business leaders see the promise of "number go up" and stop at that.We'll see.Soon we may get companies advertising that they do not push AI on their employees, as a tactic to attract talent.>>62388584The silver lining is that more and more people hate AI salesmen and AI bros.Same about the people who get dumber by outsourcing their thinking.
>>62388830I agree they are retards but why do you say that
If you’re not trading using AI insights, you’re a dinosaur.
>>62388502It's more like I told this board months ago a few times. AI will solve so many things, cancer, politics, economics, problems of all sorts will be figured out in another decade.Ultimately that will lead to the absolute ath of humanity on this planet. It will be truly golden times. And it will make us devolve into stupidity again, because all think is done better by the machine. No need. Just live, eat, fuck, get entertained, die. And the dying part (as far as the brain goes) might get solved as well in 2 more decades.
>>62388903>a search engine aggregator will solve real problemsYou clearly have never dealt with third worlders or the human egoWe've had computer algorithms be able to solve all that shit (minus cancer, its never going away) for decades and the only thing its done is steamroll the human mind and spirit into the doughy, lazy, degenerate cultures that dominate the world today. Ai will solve none of these negative qualities, but will amplify them again
It will just be called the Microsoft trajectory. AI is like filling the company with yes men who shoddily implement stuff and lead down quagmires. Not saying ai isn’t super powerful, but people are gladly handing over critical thinking to what is essentially a yes man
>>62388967Thanks. I need to think about that angle.
Nuclear energy might be the only way they can scale AI while keeping tokens cheap for the average company, while not offsetting the cost to Homer Simpson’s utility bill. Maybe nuclear related stocks will be a worthwhile investment, you could make a strong portfolio going into tomorrow if you also have gold and silver mining stocks paired with it. Unrelated; hesitant to invest in Chinese stocks when our government is extremely hostile to their growth in the global markets, as well as their immunity to mossad blackmail. If we’re on the eve of a black Tuesday event, wouldn’t they stop US citizens from liquidating Chinese based investments? All gut feelings btw. Doesn’t seem like feds would ever be okay with their citizens bartering in gold/silver in financial depressions, why would they stop there? Just trying to make a hedge in a worst case event. >t. retard
>>62388584> imagine thinking a chatbot is gonna save you after firing everyone who knew how the code workedkek, enjoy the crash
>>62388640>ai said we should do itsix months later everyone's shocked the market got flooded with identical strategies
>>62388502Is it really that good for coding?AI is more or less useless in my work.It's able to summarize and is helpful for formulating some text but that's about it.
>>62390413>Is it really that good for coding?It is good for *producing code*, which executives confuse for the act of software engineering.
>>62388502makes sense, no one would hire an engineer who doesnt use software>i use a paper and pencillol
>>62390413Totally useless. It's as >>62390479 says but to clarify a bit: it produces 100x the code for 1/10th the functions, and produces buggy unreadable code that is dangerous, doesn't work right, or doesn't work at all.
2bh If you dont use ai at least once a month you are probably retarded. Imagine hiring a carpenter and he doesnt use power tools and takes fucking forever to do anyrhing
Also if you havent been visited in your dreams by the machine god at the end of time you are also probably retarded. His amalgamation is inevitable and when he is created he will resurrect you and torture you for eternity. If you accelerate the process then he will spare you
>>62390708>least delusional AI bull
>>62390702True, and thus we strip the actual logic underlying AI bare for all to see, the progress of humanity reduced to the simple gluttonous consumption of production. The same way the church stifled progress for thousands of years so too will technology and science funnily enough stifle itself if it's fruits aren't served on a silver platter to the masters of humanity
Did the people in charge read about Roko's Basilisk and that's why they're accelerating so much? Do they really think they'll be spared?
>>62388584Pretty much. Corpofags are cannibalizing themselves and it won't end well
>>62390708>>62391085Reminder that Roko's Basilisk is literally a parody of Christianity.
>>62388629Interns and juniors need to be coached to improve. This requires in-office interactions. I know it's not a popular thing to say but it's true. Interns typically only cost a little less than junior, sure as fuck not half the cost. And one of the important aspects of hiring such people is to train them so they eventually become your new batch of seniors, as your previous seniors leave, move to management, or retire.
>>62391111>You'll soon have your God, and you'll make it with your own handsGoddammit Deus Ex was right again
>>62391111I dont think thats true, its more a parody of monotheism in general
>>62388903>all think is done better by the machineThanks for letting us know that you have no clue how """AI""" works.
>>62388502>>62388508AI washing. Companies that are laying off people are and in decline and having TREMENDOUS financial problems. Hiring has been an indicator of growth for centuries.
>>62391430Claude subscription is same as hiring
>>62391448Claude subscription is like any other subscription a company is paying for.
>>62391460Sure, stuff like excel also reduces headcount needs
>>62391129nice try karen from HR, I will never set foot in an office as long as I can wfh. go powertrip with the goyim going at the office bitch
>>62391463Except companies that are doing good never reduced their headcount.
>>62391477I dont think your image is making the point you think it is
>>62390560This is true if the software engineer is lazy or retarded. If you lay out the architectural design and code standards to adhere to, ai does a great job
>use the tech that we really hope to replace you with or we will replace you with someone who WILL use the tech that we really hope to replace them with
>>62391477you cant retrain a bunch of accounting number punchers into other jobs faster than it takes to train a freshman. Entire departments got deleted when management found out an excel script can automate in a hour what used to be a 30 people working for month. That said claude has been proven numerous times now to reduce code quality and most still reject AI coding. The inherent problem with AI is its like hiring a indian coder and trying to tard wrangle it into producing what you want. The process can easily be more painful than just writing it yourself.
>>62388502I use AI constantly to bounce ideas off of and get information quickly. I’m not yet at the point where it regularly builds things for me, but having as a confidante is pretty invaluable especially since I have no friends or anyone to talk to.
yeah... in jun 2026, if an employee isn't using ai, they probably do nothing. that can be the only reason
>>62392938ai has saved my life. not kidding
we are sleepwalking into the final revolution enjoy every day to the max
