>By 2040 or so, it will become clear the AI's impact on the economy has been no greater than a 3D printer.Literally the same situation by the way.
>>62396966nah, it's the inverse. boomers were tricked into going ballsdeep into AI because they're insecure about missing out on the dotcom boom.
>>62396966yes. but we still have to have an epic crash because the economic benefit of ai hasn't materialized yet. just like pets.com and that ilk were terribly unprofitable at the time. the time to invest in all this stuff is after the nasdaq drops 80-90%. i predict it'll bottom sometime in late '27 or early '28.>>62397019not sure if jeet or zoomer. the boomers are the same guys who were had when the nasdaq popped in 2000. they're falling for it again now.
>>62397087you're too boomboom to understand you've been duped. valuations right now blow the dotcom boom completely out of the water. the load has been blown. it's all downhill for LLMs from here.>the economic benefit of ai hasn't materialized yetand it never will, since this isn't "AI" at all
>>62396966yeah, assuming it becomes AGI, the "economy" will no longer be a thing and Capitalism itself will fail. AI will not revolutionize anything and it is inherently uncontrollable.
How does AI give us "new information". The bots harvested everything on the internet without paying. Now they're just going to reproduce off of low quality messages on x, reddit, substack?The whole AI is mostly hardware buildout. While internet's fiber could be used for decades most GPUs are done after 8 years.It's basically a cool technology but extremely costly
>>62396966And yet the dot com bubble was undeniably a bubbleJust because a product is real and useful, doesn't mean a bubble can't form around it. In fact, that just makes a bubble even more likely. Real estate is real and useful; that doesn't mean a bubble can't form around it.
