LMAO!!!!!https://chain.link/blog/build-program-evolution
xrp is the chosen coin…it’s undeniable at this point
Come on man, this shit still spamming after 8 years? Just give it up. There are thousands of other coins.
"Chainlink Labs is transitioning from payments made in project tokens to focusing on commercial agreements involving fees paid in LINK or other liquid assets that can be readily converted to LINK."Build members will buy my bags?
Bullish.
>>62417511Brad gargleballs is an even bigger scammer.
>>62417503>Chainlink Labs is transitioning
>>62417517All the major institutions offering xrp ETF’s don’t seem to think so
>>62417503makes sense
>>62417540Theyre selling a product and making money from it. Thats it.
The only actual FUD I’ve felt about Link in 8 years was when they brought in this BUILD program. I was never interested in any sort of incentives outside of the coin, and i had zero interest in staking. I was always of the mindset that Link will go to $2,000 per coin or whatever; what the fuck do I care about getting some asshole’s project coins and increasing my net worth by 2% with it mooning. Even staking rewards I don’t give a fuck about. Although in hindsight I probably should have staked to get the extra 10% in free coins over the last few years, but I would have unstaked and sold irregardless once the price of Link got to $500 or whatever
>>62417514More like Chainlink is stealing your rewards and giving it to themselves.
>>62417568Hahaha, exactly
The main reason this should sound an alarm for linkies is that there's no reason they couldn't say "actually we're shutting down staking" or "actually we're shutting down need for the $LINK token" at any time. What's actually stopping them from doing this?
>>62417733This is why I never staked. Staking came after the FTX scam. No fucking way I’m not having possession of my coins. For what? 4 measly % in rewards. You dumb motherfuckers and your staking rewards. It doesn’t fucking matter if the coin is at $5,000 and you get staking rewards cuz you are already filthy rich. I hope they seize all your shit and I’ll be at the yacht party alone with with a bunch of bitches and some /biz/ jannies
>>62417778to play devil's advocate the one way it pays is if the pool legitimately never really opens back up and being a staker winds up being extraordinarily profitable.
>>62417782I guarantee you that within 2 years all APY coming from staking will go to reserve. The writing is on the wall and it couldn't be anymore obvious.Where is your GMX fee share? Link marines were promised 1.2%You're still on staking v0.2 after being promised rapid, feature heavy updates for 4 years. Now the team is telling you they are going to pocket the fees the COMMUNITY was subsidizing through BUILD. I honestly think Sergey has a death wish.
>>62417793>Where is your GMX fee share?buried by Hyperliquid
>>62417599an ETF isnt an endorsement of the company itself lol
>>62417793I'm not arguing the reality, the only think linkies have to hold onto is the possibility of a better future at this point. I'll also (again just playing the other side) point out the regardless of whether or not it ultimately benefits the LINK token, Chainlink is realistically one of like 5 crypto projects amongst the hundreds of "legitimate" ones that actually is seeing real adoption and has a huge use case that is surviving the infantile stages of crypto, and not just surviving but will thrive. So again, who knows if this ultimately helps the token price, but I do understand why linkies hold onto some faith still.
>>62417802GMX fee share is going to the reserve, actually.
They’re switching it to Link tokens. Nice.
>>62417782It’s all push and pull. Ying yang. If you have 20 million earning you 800k (500k post tax) per year… Is life good? Absolutely. But that’s at the expense of having 20 million locked up that you can’t touch. Personally to me that’s boring as fuck and it’s too much money coming in a year where making any more money matters. You’ll probably fall into bad devices unless you have an extreme passion for something. I’ll take the 20 mil. And wing it and save 1,000 link buried somewhere in case I fuck up. And by then link might be 10x more then what it initially was when you first sold so you’ll probably have an equal amount of money if you fuck up.
>>62417782I think the ONLY people who should stake are in the 1,000 to 3,000 stack range.3,000 link at $1,000 is 3 million. You have no room for error here. You have about 90k coming in yearly post tax. This is great. You can NEET it up and be very aggressive in investing in your passion or whatever which will give you purpose and try to bring that 3 million up to 10 million or whatever and you’ll feel a sense of pride. But if you get clobbered investing say 60k 1 year…. It doesn’t matter cuz you got your 90k per year social security payment coming in yearly
>>62417503Thats goodLiterally every build project was useless shitcoin
>>62417836yeah, just saying it's a pittance since HL disrupted the entire perps market simply by turning their token-permissioned validator set into the oracle network
>>62417888until they turn around and say pools closed.It's looking highly likely that staking will only be a thing for the 45M tokens already staked.Staking is a completed system that doesn't require any further updates or any more people involved/staking
>chainlink reserve announced>treated by everyone as a mild gesture of good will to holders to make up for the regular market dumps>there's no system or contract actually locking LINK into the reserve, they could dump it all too if they chose to>doesn't matter though, it's a sideshow compared to the value staking 1.0 would bring>suddenly staking 1.0 goes from "2 more weeks" vaporware to MIA in any blog posts or q&a's>not even brought up with a "in the event of Clarity Act passing..." theoretical, it's simply gone>instead, twitter PR and announcement posts start consistently pushing the reserve as the main source of future LINK value>despite the fact that it's still a smalltime sideshow that doesn't actually lock or burn anythingI'm starting to experience feelings of fear, uncertainty, and even doubt about my investment
being in the usa i couldn't get those rewards anywayand no i didn't want to risk anything with a VPN
>>62417503after the claim shitshow its not surprisingi didnt even bother claiming those shitcoins
>>62418149Who cares? Dont get me wrong I see the point of staking in theory… plug your 10k link in there and make 500k/year or whatever. My point is it doesn’t matter if you take. Cuz you got 10 million whether you stake or not
NIGGER!
>>62418149How will you steak without LPL?Think long and hard about it
>>62418693It's a fair point buuuuut think of it like you get a high yield on tcp/ip or the global water reserve, resources which are highly necessary and consistently increase in their value and what it costs to utilize them, and are not going away within your lifetime or the next 10-100+. Why even care about putting your money elsewhere? The opportunity to invest in something like Chainlink - core infrastructure with insane value capture potential, has never really existed before. The closest thing maybe would be investing in AMZN prior to cloud services, but this is actually a way bigger scale because data/compute is an infant compared to the system of MONEY.It's an insane long play but it has legs still, given all the adoption we've seen.I think it's a very real possibility most early linkies crash out having made nothing or lost money even after 10+ years and then we legitimately see insane levels of adoption start happening and the token price go wildly parabolic. That doesn't mean you wouldn't still have been better off selling at a $30-50 pre 2027 high, opportunity cost is real.
>>62418519bro you literally have zero risk now, they're shutting the program down, just grab your tokens and sell them>t. US citizen who cashed out all tokens early, still stakes, zero repercussions
this is quite the embarrassing end to this chapter of being a linky
>>62418503>people on 4chan are super fearful for half a year now>its peak fear>half manufacturedI guess... im gonna get even more linkies
>>62417888>3,000 link at $1,000 is 3 million$5 is a lot more likely. Maybe even lower.
>>62418846Adoption that has no impact on the token value whatsoever. I've been blocked twice by the Chainlink intern handling the twitter account for calling them out. Will continue to do so once I create another account. Sergey probably has a security detail like some high level politician by now.
Arguably was the most logical choice in the first place. Although my God are the optics terrible. Who the fuck is running their marketing and communications.Chris Barrett and Rory and chainlink God need to shut the fuck up desu. I still get they don't want to talk about the token which is fair enough things aren't locked in stone legally and cunts talking about other tokens do xyz need to understand the way chainlink labs operates is still centralised so they are still open to legal scrutiny.The fact they can't say some basics like link staking next iteration is being worked on is surprising. I hate how coy they act like heh we just dump tokens on binance whoever buys it we don't know as if people didn't fund their entire company.Governments globally are to blame allowing any token sales to not have the same protection as stocks imo. Digital commodities my ass when they can press a button and mint tokens out of thin air.
it sucks, but please don't sell, ok? please
We hadn't heard from it in a year and in something like 3 years of BUILD we effectively had one drop from all the shitcoins getting subsidized services from us. I never even bothered claiming.
>>62417503BULLISH
>>62417888>3,000 link at $1,000 is 3 millionLinkies are mentally retarded handicapped baggies kekYour shitcoin is trading at $7 and you're poor
>>62417503This is a GOOD choice, but its LATE. Why the fuck does it take ~5 years to come to shit conclusion that you dont want 1000's of garbage tokens?Why the fuck now? At this point, the critics were right, the only way to win with LINK is to SHORT IT.
>>62417511Are you people all mad. Here’s some assets since new year. Why the FUCK would you be in Link or XRP. Look at how much money you’ve fucking lost potentially. Are you actually retarded. Even gold only lost 5%
>>62417503Not only are they not ending Build, they're making it all about the Link token.Build payments and rewards used to be in member tokens, now they will either be in Link or be converted to Link.It's right there in black and white, you illiterate brown.
>>62419349Look at our little armchair CEO over here. How's your tech company doing?
>>62419676But they're taking the rewards away from stakers. It's all going to the Reserve.I think everyone was hoping staking and thr distrobution of protocol revenue would all be handled programmatically (Payment Abstraction seemed to be a step towards this) but instead everything is routed through Chainlink Labs.Initially I thought the BUILD rewards would be auto-converted to LINK and then contribute to the staking APY. Instead we're stuck at Staking 0.2 and BUILD goes to Reserve. Wtf.
>>62419676Well, unless you actually receive additional LINK as a staker, it's completely irrelevant. Who knows how long they will keep this pacifier staking running anyway? They can pull the plug at any time. No consequences as it has been clear as day that this whole paper staking experiment was made up to shut up the critics. Didn't last long though...
>>62419687>they're taking the rewards away from stakersBuild rewards were never going 100% to stakers.>It's all going to the Reserve.The cap in OP clearly says otherwise.Learn to read, brown.>>62419694>unless you actually receive additional LINK as a staker, it's completely irrelevant.Tell it to the fuddies howling about how they don't want "random shitcoins".
So the build rewards that were hyped (I remember the retard with the spreadsheet valuations lmfao) turned out to be a flop and worth pennies.Now these literal pennies will be converted and go to the already small reserve with 0 price impact. While they put in 1 millions worth of tokens per week they still dump 8% of the supply per year.Inb4 the sperg comes in "tokens unlocks are not sales" they create sell pressure , nigger.
>>62419349>The fact they can't say some basics like link staking next iteration is being worked on is surprisingWhat if they don’t say it because it is not being worked on? Why draw attention to it?
>>62417503Nomore free rides for build startups, now they need to pay?Not sure if bullish or bearish desu
>>62419194I'm a fuddie but you are right. If you're a holder then acoomulate more and lower your price targets next cycle.
>>62417888Checked, counting the chickens before they hatch
>>62419888Checked, and correct. We are fucked, well it was nice thinking i would get rich one day
>>62419888>>62420241You faggots are like the riffraff who like to go to the casino to play your game of choice but the motivation to get you out the door is some stupid fucking promotional thing. Like you like to play poker or blackjack, and you are even good at these games, but you only decide to go cuz there’s some free slot play for $10 for signing up for a their casino card. It’s like you faggots think that these build rewards would make up half your profit from investing in link. Link goes to $500 and you have 5 million dollars, and your expecting some bullshit build token to make you 2.5 million dollars also?
>>62420825The fuck is that analogy lmao. This isn't a casino you dumb faggot, real people invested real money into an asset that promised certain things by certain dates and they have not only underdelivered but are starting to actively ignore those promises. >Build rewards were always a nothingcarrot anyways!you are such a raped goy its not even funny.
>>62419676Build was literally start ups getting free link services (funded by the team selling link) in exchange for token supplies that may be worth something one day. It's expressly for those who couldn't afford the services, so no they won't just use link instead.
>>62420825Ive been holding link since 2017, 2 man team of stuttering pot heads. Lower your tone when talking to me biy
>>62420893I didn’t invest in Link in early 2018 cuz of stupid fucking Build rewards. Were they even a thing in 2018? Or were they after the fact like 2019-20?If I staked and had build rewards I would have given them to hookers cuz they are irrelevant to the link investment we made. In no world would any Build token or combined build tokens would have made up more than 10% of the profits we would get from holding link.
>>62420825>Link goes to $500best we can do is $1.50 in 2030
>>62417503It's funny that the BUILD program is the only way I've ever actually had to interact with the ecosystem that I invested so much into.I had to learn how to use a DEX to unload these shitcoin bags lmao.It was a nice little bonus though. All up I ended up getting about $12,400 from it.
>>62418828Based
>>62420922"... or be converted to Link".Another illiterate brown imbecile.
>>62421109Nice so our $194.50 each combined total of rugged build shitcoin airdrops can go to purchasing an extra 20 link tokens for the reserve instead.. Marvelous!.................. KABOOOOOOOOM BULLISH CHAINLINK! $LINK #LINKTHEWORLD
>>62420922What they're saying is that those token supplies have performed terribly and aren't even worth holding. Every single one of them. It's not a good look for the ecosystem, but the good thing is it won't affect the price because nothing does.
>>62421528Not really. They're saying that projects aren't launching native tokens any more, and so aren't eligible for the current BUILD program. So they're finding different ways to encourage growth (particularly in the very small number of projects that actually succeed) while still making sure they PAY UP.
Chain Link Labs, "Our build coins aren't worth shit, so we're canceling build forever, thanks"!
>>62421600The converted proceeds still should go directly towards the ecosystem participants (ie. NOPs and stakers), not to Chainlink Labs' own personal Reserve.CLL should be adopting a more behind-the-curtains presence but instead they route the entire network through themselves. Not really neutral.
>>62420825>It’s like you faggots think that these build rewards would make up half your profit from investing in link.Thats how the turboshills hyped it up here. Reserve, a flop.Ccip revenue a flopPAL a flopBuild rewards a flopAMA a flopLink staking 2.0 a flopEric schmidt, Tom szach, all flops 0 will flow to token holders , its all carrots. Only ones left are donkeys and the one on the cart.
>>62421109Yes it won't happen. The projects can't afford link and their tokens have no value, so that means there just won't be any value coming into the ecosystem from it. Never was tbqh.
>>62421684>>62421956>>62422159>>62422217xerpies crying overtime again
>>62417503Never mind, they were all dogshit anyway.Require all transactions to be made in dollars and use that to fill the reserves and drive up the value of the token.
>>62421600Ah that's better>>62421956And this is true. The reserve does nothing for us whereas at least the build rewards were supposed to go to us.Does this announcement mean there is no build season 2 or subsequent though? That's what I took from. The announcement ie we get nothing now.
>>62422290The reserve doesn't help holders, it only helps Chainlink the company
>>62422638>The announcement ie we get nothing now.another illterate brown xerpie
I am so glad I have never touched this piece of shit. The level of delusion here is unprecedented
>>62422671You own XRP and you’re gay
>>62422671baggie delusion doesn't bother me personally, it's the fact that shills were vehemently shilling and defending BUILD for years that infuriates me, and now they act like it was never a big deal it's always 180 degree pivot and then denial and deflection, it's sickening
>>62422761You've been reading shills defend Build for years? Why would you do that?
>>62422274>never debate the point>always ad hominem / adem / xerpie
>>62423044>p-p-pls debate me!
Kek
>>62422761Always been the case. Before it comes morons push whatever release as "they key" that will unlock all token value and you need to have your ducks in a row beforehand. Then it passes and they go fucking radio silent. Then half a year later that thing was never a big deal anyway and we should all not talk about it. You had spastics making charts about how BUILD alone would return $1-2 per link staked each month. If you mentioned what a universal collection of utter vaporware shit the projects were you would get called a fudder.
>>62417535Sir Gay indeed.
>>62423276You're talking to yourself.Nobody keeps tabs on every single granular development from a project they hate for years, but here you are juggling IDs pretending there are dozens of you.
>>62423276My wife asked me where we're going to go on vacation this year with the money we made from the folk finance drop. I don't have the heart to tell her that we might be able to split a kids meal at Applebee's. She looks up to me as an intelligent head of the house.
60k link staked.. 20k USD a year... i needed the build rewards to fuck around with...
>>62423276/threadthe constant gaslighting is even more annoying desu>samefags reeeeeee
>>62423360Why are you even reading this "gaslighting"? Who's forcing you to be here?
>>62423259Hilarious deflection after doing this>>62422274The absolute state
>>62423353How does 2 million a year sound?
>>62423283I kept granular details on a project i own for years, to my incomprehensible regret
>>62423276The sad fact of the matter is that jeetlinkers will still be delirious off copium a decade from now, even after CLL pulls the plug in five years beforehand.
good. i never could participate in build anyway as a US fag
>>62422668It literally says "the most recent season of Chainlink Rewards will mark the conclusion of Build-related token rewards, with claims ending on July 7, 2026" meaning no season 2+ of build rewards going to stakers.It also says "Proceeds from these new agreements are expected to be programmatically converted to LINK and used to support the growth of the network through programs such as the Chainlink Reserve." meaning that link goes to the reserve, not to stakers.Previously>stakers will get build rewardsNow>Chainlink gets paid in link
xswap isnt even on cow swap? where do you sell this trash?
S E X
>>62424386Brutal
>>62424023>this project has always been pushed by morons>also I've been holding this project for yearsYou're lying. And brown.>>62424386You're a brown ESL monkey who doesn't even know what the words "such as" mean.Protip: the same exact words were used when Build was first introduced.
>>62417503HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Another nail in the coffin and shovel full of dirt in the grave on the biggest retail fraud in token history.
>>62419638Link is underperforming fucking death spiraled LUNC since Trump revived crypto. Lol And by a lot.
>>62419707>A chainlink shill calling someone else brown.
>>62422159>>62423276Perfectly said.
>>62425620I'm a 100k link holder. I have more link than you."Such as" isn't very fucking reliable. All of this would be fine if link was valued as it should be but it fucking isn't, with no clear path to gaining that value.
>>62425962>CLL uses "such as" in 2022 when launching Build>THIS IS SET IN STONE>CLL uses "such as" in 2026 when changing Build>THIS IS NOT VERY FUCKING RELIABLEYou're a brown paid fuddie.
>>62425980I'm also whiter than you, Yank.
>>62425980>>62425620post a picture of your hand with timestamp
i am just getting caught up on this news after the weekend. my my my how the mighty have falleni predicted all of this for the last few years but the boyscouts couldn't handle it>duuuuuuuuuuuude i need a team of tax attorneys for the heckin rewardsBAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHlook at you now. an expensive lesson on controlling your ego. you needed it thoyour hubris was your downfallTHE Cuckolds of crypto
>>62417512>There are thousands of other coins.LOL this dude stuck in 2021. that's your conclusion bro, just buy other scam coins? don't you people get it? altcoins are dead. capital moved back to actual companies in the stock market. only a retarded sap would continue donating to a bunch of nerds for a "whitepaper" >>62417833>I'll also (again just playing the other side) point out the regardless of whether or not it ultimately benefits the LINK token, Chainlink is realistically one of like 5 crypto projects amongst the hundreds of "legitimate" ones that actually is seeing real adoption and has a huge use case that is surviving the infantile stages of crypto, and not just surviving but will thrive. So again, who knows if this ultimately helps the token price, but I do understand why linkies hold onto some faith still.so are you just a fan of the company? >>62417873>It’s all push and pull. Ying yang. If you have 20 million earning you 800k (500k post tax) per yearwho the fuck would do that? the $20m has drawn down 80% so no, life is not good. anyone not retarded would've parked most of that in the s&p500 and has been making at least 15% per yearif you really wanted pathetic 4% return you could get that in a savings account where your only risk is that actual bank going bust
>>62418846> The opportunity to invest in something like Chainlink - core infrastructure with insane value capture potential, has never really existed before. The closest thing maybe would be investing in AMZN prior to cloud services,you are not invested in chainlink. you made a donation kid amazon's revenue in year 7 was $3B. and that's in 2001 numbers. you can go ahead and stop comparing to your shitcoin bro you're embarrassing yourself >>62420893>The fuck is that analogy lmao. This isn't a casino you dumb faggot, real people invested real money into an asset that promised certain things by certain dates and they have not only underdelivered but are starting to actively ignore those promises.it's the end stage of a cult investment where they turn on each other. it somehow becomes the fault of the "community" on why they didnt make any money. in order to preserve their ego, guys like >>62420825 have to spin the story that you'd have to be crazy to expect any kind of gains. mind you the rest of the world's market all hit all time highs while you are down 80-90%. by creating this narrative, he avoids recognizing he's holding a really bad investment and can continue on thinking he's a secret genius.
remember this old pasta? still relevant today. every cl product roughly follows this life cycle
>>62425681Oh I remember this one - this poster is an actual bot.
>>62419888The best part is SIR GAY NIGGEROV got all these companies to be part of the BUILD program, and then those companies did actually in many cases issue tokens but most did not provide tokens to CLL to give out as rewards for participating in the Staking pool. If there had actually been airdrops from every single participant then the program would have brought some relevant value to token holders instead of what, like 9 companies giving tokens long after their tokens had already followed the shitcoin chart to its completion and become totally worthless.
soon the staking program will be canceled tooand then stinkies will be out of all hopefeels good
>>62431631Well the new line seems to be the price will improve when all link is circulating and the team has fully divested itself of the token. Which i don't know if it's just late stage imbecile drivel or the most brazen shill line ever attempted in history.
>>62425620I was making Teagan memes at the san fran meet up in 2019. I honestly wish it was otherwise but I've wasted fucking years with link.
>>62417503Bullish for LINK
Why are the fuddies always the ones with the most posts?
>>62423312First of all there are no vacations until the wife gives you kids.
>>62427022checked and /thread
>>62433501its what they're paid for, the number of posts
>>62433501>>62434455It’s obvious that they are paid to do this; what I don’t get is whether they’re doing it to get midwit like me to buy (and I bought without regrets), or to get dumbs to sell.
>>62434545*sell/stay away
>>62433501>>62434545>blatant samefagging why are shillers such grifting and disingenuous retards?
