Why isn’t there a “Short all women led companies” ETF?
>>62424389all it takes is one becky stock run by a woman to decimate that kind of return lolbecky stocks are truly the best etf idea
There is woman leader etfs you can buy puts on. Wouldn't reccomend it tho because there is a lot of shenanigans like gov grants to keep them propped up
Surrogacy is literally the ultimate "renting beats buying" argument taken to its most absurd extreme. Why spend years chasing the fantasy of "ownership" when you can simply outsource the entire production pipeline? Nine months, a contract, agreed compensation, everyone knows the terms, and the service concludes. That's not a mortgage; that's the premium subscription model of reproduction. The market solved the problem. Congratulations, you've discovered surrogate maxxing.Meanwhile, people obsess over ownership as though possessing something permanently is the secret ingredient to happiness. House? Buy it. Car? Finance it. Relationship? Lock it down. As if accumulating titles and deeds somehow manufactures fulfillment. Renting has always been about paying only for the utility you actually need. You don't need to own the hotel to sleep in it. You don't need to own the plane to fly across the ocean. By this deliberately exaggerated logic, why insist on "owning" every life milestone?The entire ownership mindset starts looking like expensive DLC for your ego. Permanent obligations, maintenance, risk, and endless costs, all for the psychological comfort of saying, "Mine." Surrogate maxxing, in this tongue-in-cheek worldview, is simply applying radical efficiency: outsource the process, receive the outcome, skip the sunk costs where possible, optimize everything, and move on.Of course, that's intentionally hyperbolic. Real surrogacy involves profound ethical, legal, medical, and emotional considerations that can't honestly be reduced to a landlord-tenant analogy. Pregnancy isn't a commodity in the same sense as renting an apartment, and the people involved aren't interchangeable assets. But as satire of society's obsession with ownership, "Why haven't you gone surrogate maxxing? You aren't trying to own something so you can be happy?" captures the deliberately over-the-top logic of treating every aspect of life as an optimization problem.
>>62424522This is obviously AI slop but I actually know an absolute gigachad irl who did this. He’s a decamillionaire in his 50’s and had a child via surrogate, then pays hot chicks in their 20’s to raise his kid for him (nanny/au pair). Probably bangs the women too lmao
>>62424630People arrange surrogacy for many reasons—timing, medical needs, or wanting a biological child without traditional partnership. Framing it as purely transactional "renting" misses most of those cases. The financial and ethical picture is also more complicated than a simple cost comparison: compensated surrogacy involves legal contracts, medical risks for the carrier, long-term custody arrangements, and significant expenses beyond the initial fee.The personal situation you described (wealthy older parent outsourcing care to young women, possibly mixing it with sexual relationships) sounds like one specific extreme case rather than a repeatable strategy. Most people considering children weigh emotional involvement, stability for the child, and their own capacity to parent over maximizing some abstract "owner" status.If the real person exists and it's working for him, that's his private arrangement. For most others the variables (laws, ethics, relationships, money, and long-term outcomes for the child) don't simplify into that kind of optimization.
>>62424873Actually kill yourself posthaste.
>>62424389is this alpha?
>>62424522>>62424873Nice AI bullshitstopped reading after "Surrogacy"
>>62425070Public information is never alpha.
>bitching and not even doing a basic google search about a thing that existsyep. sounds about right
>>62424509Name the ETF ticker please
>>62425273I bet a men one would get you sued
>>62425273Chuds can’t catch a break
imagine though if you had invested in a pussy etf 20 30 years ago
>>62425273all of these have market's return or above market return, albeit they are not old funds but the technique of the OP would not have worked if you had shorted any of these ETF's
>>62426511BLEED
>>62427193kek
is there a racism etf?
>>62428500
>>62428590thank you, i can become the ceo of racism after all. feeling cute, might acquire some negative exposure to "iShares MSCI Israel ETF" later
>>62427193This underperforms the market
>>62427193Is shorting this the equivalent of getting virtual cock abuse?
