>>62432007you're a poor cuckold
is the mass crypto adoption in the room with us now
>>62433402I noticed that you didn't answer the question
>>62433409price + chartTNNthe cuckolds of crypto
Who still has money to throw at this money pit
>>62433412I noticed that you didn't answer the question
>>62433417what do I need to answer? Your thesis is that Bitcoin whales are suppressing a rank 18 dinosaur shitcoin, you're a deranged baggie. Stay poor cuck
>>62433421I noticed that you didn't read the op or answer the question
>>62432007another buy the news sell the rumor genius. why why why
>>62433427okay cuckold
>>62433430I noticed that you didn't answer the question
>>62433415There's tons of money going around for investments, just look at the stock market.That money is staying the hell away from crypto though, specifically because of extremely obvious scammy shit like this suppression.
Why would someone want to pay real money for fake internet money ?
>>62433407DTCC doesn't count as mass adoption?What the fuck are you saying?>>62433429So why are Bitcoin whales selling the Link rumor/news?
>>62433584>Bitcoin whales are sellingshow us the wallets
>>62433589If it's not Bitcoin whales selling, then who or what the fuck is doing that shit in OP?
>>62433601you made the claim bro, are you having an aneurysm?
>>62433611Bitcoin dumping on command is caused by whales selling.Who else?
>>62433615show us the wallets then
>>62433622All I have to do is show Bitcoin dumping
>>62433623why? are the whales invisible?
>>62433630Selling happens on exchanges, not in wallets.And "whales" simply means "whoever has the means to do this".
>>62433633even better, show us the order book or the exchange cold wallet transactions
>>62433635Why do I have to do that? I'm talking about Bitcoin dumping, which is obvious from the chart.I have no idea how it's done or who is doing it, all I know is it happens.
>>62433639>I have no idea how or why >you just have to blindly accept my own chart interpretation that I pulled out of my assI see, compelling theory
>>62433650>my own chart interpretation that I pulled out of my assAnyone with eyes can see "line go down" though.What the absolute fuck are you trying to cope with here?
>>62433659>claims (((whales))) are dumping>gets asked for proof >refuses to provide one, immediately lashes outwhy are you so emotional tho
>>62433666>>claims (((whales))) are dumpingSomeone is. "Whales" just means "anyone with the means to do it".
>>62433668cool, show us the order books or any transaction from CEX hot walletsyou do realize everything is on-chain, right?
>>62432007final shakeout before the biggest green dildo we've ever seen
>>62433675pedantic retard
>>62433688emotional melties do not prove your imaginary, invisible whales that keep suppressing your bags
>>62433694>Why do I have to do that? I'm talking about Bitcoin dumping, which is obvious from the chart.>Why do I have to do that? I'm talking about Bitcoin dumping, which is obvious from the chartAnswer the question instead of being a repetitive and pedantic retard
>>62433702>Bitcoin is dumping is a factual observation >because of whales suppressing my bagsis an assumption unless you or your other id can back it up with evidence, e.g the order book or txsget it?
>>62433584"mass adoption" means the masses are using cryptocurrency on a daily basis. they aren't. most people don't even know how a wallet works
>>62433702>the pendatic, repetitive, samefagging link shill with circular reasoning is projecting upon others lol, lmao even
>>62433707>because of whales suppressing my bagscan you point to where anyone claimed that in this thread? the question was: why did bitcoin pretend mass crypto adoption is bearish. i dont see anything about suppression
>>62433707"Whales" is a catch-all term for "anyone with enough BTC under his control to dump it like that".>>62433708>"mass adoption" means the masses are using cryptocurrency on a daily basisDTCC adopting crypto means that, yes.
>>62433714>DTCC adopting crypto means that, yes.no it does not, in a very literal sense
>>62433714you already said that, please don't be repetitive and instead provide some basic proof such as specific sell orders and hot wallet txsyou do realize that everything is on-chain and that you providing this basic proof will only help to reinforce your theory, right? I genuinely cannot see a reason why you refuse to do so, unless you're acting in bad faith
>>62433717DTCC is literally the largest financial transaction processor in the world. It doesn't get more "mass" than that lmao>>62433718>provide some basic proof of Bitcoin dumpingle chart
>>62433724repeating le chart is not proof of suppression
>>62433724sorry pal if you can't pinpoint the exact transaction it doesn't count. how do you know bitcoin didn't go down because of people buying? you made the claim that bitcoin dumped, but just because the chart went down doesn't mean its true
Yeah so we get all these computers solving a useless problem that isn't even a problem, wasting massive amounts of energy and that's exactly why it's valuable!I know you don't see how retarded you are, but can you at least understand how hard it is for an intelligent person to get a retard to see that they're retarded?
>>62433735try pinpointing any transaction for starters, because so far all you've done is incoherent screeching kek
>>62433732The chart is where you see Bitcoin reversing months of stable trend the picosecond DTCC announces it's adopting Chainlink this year.Why is BTC (whales, retail, etc.) pretending that is a very bearish announcement?DTCC explicitly stated many times that they will use Chainlink to connect to MANY public blockchains.It's extremely bullish news for the entire market, including Bitcoin.>>62433735>how do you know bitcoin didn't go down because of people buying?top jej
>>62433744>bitcoin dumping isn't proof of bitcoin dumping... you need to show me the exact transaction! lmao ok
>>62432007>adoptioncrypto is a SPECULATIVE ASSET, which means the concept of utility is irrelevant.
>>62433750>I can't show how it happened >but I know why, so just trust me dude!sorry anon, that's not how it works >>62433752>bitcoin dumping is proof of suppression ...no? I'm beginning to believe you're not very smart, amirite?
>>62433758Speculation is supposed to be about utility. I agree that in today's crypto market that is no longer the case; in fact events like in OP prove it's often the opposite.But it still is true in the stock market, which is why it goes up based on future adoption.>>62433762>>I can't show how it happenedWhy do I need to show HOW it happened?Anyone with eyes can see the BTC line go up for months, and then suddenly start to go down the picosecond DTCC announced its adoption of Chainlink later this year.
>>62433762>suppression again, the question was: why did bitcoin pretend mass crypto adoption is bearishyoure the only one bringing up suppression. curious that you keep trying to steer the discussion there
>>62432007>mass crypto adoptionwages predictable, no one let em be rich
The cycle is purely a psychological phenomena at this point, the issuance halving is largely immaterial to the circulating supply. It happened because people believed it would happen
>>62433768The anon you're replying to is stuck between a rock and a hard place and his only option is to change the topic or get retardedly pedantic>Can't acknowledge that the announcement is bullish for crypto as a whole because it's related to chainlink>Can't get past the fact BTC broke an upward trend exactly as this was announced because the next question will be why
>>62432007
>>62433912He was obviously trying extremely hard to derail the very obvious point.>the announcement is bullish for crypto as a wholeThere's absolutely no denying this. DTCC has always been very explicit about tapping into all of crypto via Chainlink, including public chains. They even made a public statement about including Stellar in their "multichain" adoption.
>>62433932I mean look at this.DTCC:>we are building the multichain futureBTC:>this is bearish for all of crypto
>>62433942Well it is bearish for btc because it legitimizes other crypto, half of btcs value is because "its the only real crypto all others are scams going to 0"
>>62433956I would buy that, if it weren't for the fact that BTC always pumps when bullish news for the general market drops.BTC pumped when Walmart supposedly adopted LTC, when Elon hinted at using Doge, when Blackrock supposedly adopted HBAR, when Ripple won in court, etc.
>>62433942it's so funny watching altcoin holders post these as if they are some huge revelationthey actually think they're in on some secret alpha despite these posts all being public the age old question here bro, how does this help your shitcoin? you need a massive undertaking just for the offchain caymans company (chainlink labs) to earn a few million bucksgiven how minuscule cl fees are, dtcc could bring $500b assets onchain and let's say it turns over 4 times in a year so 2 tril of volume... at the measly 0.1 basis points or whatever they charge, that's only $20m of annual revenue. that barely even makes a dent in their annual operating expenses and that's the best case scenario. i would bet everything i have they aren't even close to onboarding that volume by 2030.
>>62433982>BTC pumped when Walmart supposedly adopted LTC, when Elon hinted at using Dogelook at uncle rico here stuck in past cycles. might as well have been 100 years ago. in case you need it spelled out, the market is maturing, which means scam announcements don't work like they did in the past
aaaaanyway, anyone wanna take a stab at answering my question >>62432007?
>>62435111Checked. They can't answer because it's happening and has been happening for a decade now. The suppression is very, very real. It's vox populi for anyone in crypto, everyone know it. That's why Link is the best investment you can do. Hold for dear life and don't give in to the poor, third world cuckfuddies nor paid fudders (there are dozens of them here with the only purpose of fudding Link). Bullish as hell, boys. WAAGMI
>>62434448Why did XLM pump +100% because DTCC tweeted about them? (because they are a SCALE partner)
>>62434437>DTCC is a pipe dream>DTCC is real but they aren't paying>DTCC is real and they are paying but none will flow to the token>DTCC is real and they are paying and it will flow to the token but its going to be a pittance. MY NUMBERS are correctkek Adem you are 37 lmao where the fuck are your wife and kids?also post portfolio, i want to laugh at ur financial status at close to 40yo
Bump
>>62435157>Why did XLM pump +100% because DTCC tweeted about them?I would like to know this as well.Stellar:>institutions use private forks without XLM>non-exclusive DTCC news since Stellar is just one chain in DTCC's "multichain future"Chainlink:>all Chainlink products unequivocally use the token at the node level, including institutional products>exclusive DTCC news since Chainlink is pretty much the only oracle/bridge that actually worksSo why on earth did XLM pump on their DTCC news but Link didn't?
>>62433762You are being a total pig headed nigger and a total disingenuous Jew at the same time. Your pilpul won't work here. I was there for every event you claim didn't exist.
>LINK has been suppressed for a decade>nobody has figured out how or who is doing it despite the fact that blockchain forensics is literally a thing>team apparently doesn't even care about a decade long, on-going suppression campaign against the most vital tool of their entire networkthis is proof that link holders are the most incompetent and retarded group in the entire space, completely useless mouthbreathers whom cannot even look up blockchain metrics how the FUCK can you claim suppression for 10 years with zero proof apart from cherry picked, 5 minute charts?you are imbeciles, helpless and incompetent, no other way around it>m-m-muh suppression!DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT, hire some experts, what the FUCKor just admit you're schizoid lunatics and this suppression narrative is nothing more than cope and a justification to keep on holding your bleeding bags
>>62439257there he is again with another shiny new ID
>>62439257Bro
>>62439257>team apparently doesn't even care about a decade long, on-going suppression campaign against the most vital tool of their entire networkThat's a good point. What are your theories on this?
>>62439257>>62439416also, play Salieri
>>62433675Most cex buy/sell transactions are not on chain, rerard fag
>>62440045everything is on the order book, moron
>>62440475>just trust us broyeah yeah, the cex says so, why would they lie?!
>>62440580>the order book is unreliable >blockchain forensics are not trustworthy >OP and his screenshots is the arbiter of truthwhat kind of mental illness is this
It's binance you dummy, linkbtc for proofI don't care about your thoughts on it the entire market is fake and gay>t. anon
>>62440953LINK/BTC is completely dead as a trading pair, the volume is abysmal and has been for years>binance is suppressing LINKthen why is the team sending them more LINK each quarter? Are they masochists, insane, or retarded?
>>62440475The order book doesn't show a damn thing other than prices, cumulative order sizes, and timestamps.You can't glean a single bit of relevant information from this, other than "there is a lot of selling at increasingly low price levels".Which is clearly obvious from the spot price chart as well.You absolute dummie.
>>62432007No more greater fools if everyone's already in
