lmao
>p-please don't regulate us, y-you can even have 5% of our very valuable company>if we ever make profit- er I mean WHEN we make profit, you get a cut! heheh, what a deal huh?
>>62437562>implying this was intended to make openai more independent
>>62437569It's a desperation quid pro quo. The US gov can annihilate Openai with a keystroke, just as it threatened to do to Anthropic. This is Altman selling an imagined product in hopes of creating amity between Openai (a shit company with shit products) and the US government (perennial bail out giver toward shit companies that make shit products).
>>62437533It is over.
>>62437533Article: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/02/openai-proposes-us-government-own-5percent-stake-to-address-political-blowback.html
>>62437582openAI imploding this winter will be so fucking glorious to witness, i can't wait
A.I. is a threat to the future of humanity and needs to be destroyed
>>62438113it would be like trying to destroy the printing press, good luck nigga.Non-retarded dichotomy would be centralized VS sovereign AI (or tech in general).
