>Over the weekend, I got a message from a tech company CEO outlining his TOTAL BAN ON AI across his organization. There are no exclusions. It is not limited to generative AI. It is not temporary. It is a full stop.>It turns out that the corporate dream of a single “100x” human managing hordes of AI agents isn’t the optimal way to run a businessSorry not sorry, you've been warned multiple times but kept throwing money into casino chips aka AI stocks.https://www.inc.com/joe-procopio/the-first-company-wide-ai-ban-just-hit-my-inbox-heres-what-it-means/91357535
>The Ban on AI Research>The CEO’s company had been dealing with a slump in conversion rates for the better part of 2026>Turns out, AI-assisted research had resulted in casting a much wider net for prospects and dragged in many that were not nearly a fit. In some cases, the companies were defunct, and in one case, the company didn’t exist at all. The best the CEO could figure is that AI had just inferred it into existence
>The Ban on AI Agents>One of the agents broke, in that was unable to scrape data it needed to generate a report. Its solution was to just generate the report anyway and then to freak out about the sudden change in what that report was saying, now that it was missing foundational information but treating it as if that entire business line had suddenly gone to zero.>“It took a week to figure it out, because the guy who created the agent wasn’t the guy responsible for the report, and he was stalling while re-running months’ worth of reports by hand.”
>The Ban on Vibe Coding>The reporting failure was the trigger for the ban.>“When I discovered we had two different versions of the same module in our platform, connected to two different databases filled with two different sets of data stored in two completely different and unrelated [schemas], the next day I put the ban in place.”
>>62449963I'm happy for you, or sorry that happened to you.
>>62449963>believing corporate media slop intended to make poorfags stay out
>>62449983>they don't want us to make money
>>62449963>single “100x” human managing hordes of AI agents isn’t the optimal way to run a businessIt is, but there is so little "100x" human and definitely no one is working for that specific company.
>>62450012Speaking for myself, I do not like the idea of poors entering my country club.
>>62449963It isn't dying, but people are waking up to the fact that it's not "Jarvis, run my company" situation and that there is a hard skill curve to coordinating agent pipelines.
>>62450012True, but the game is already rigged for the casino either way.
Not reading all that but AI isn't going anywhere, the pace may slow down but it's not going to be binned off.
CEOniggers once again proven to be 40 IQ retards.
>>62449963Our CEO is going all-in on AI for software development and it has boosted our throughput by 2-3x. It's not slop code, either.We have unlimited tokens.t. SWE at startup
>>62449963Over the weekend my ceo told me we are adopting more ai
>>62450414>It's not slop codelol. LMAO even
>inc.comWhat>a tech ceoWhich company
>>62450012>rich people investing 3 trillion into AI the last 4 years>Nvidia a 5 trillion dollar company>the AI market is over now, because it's overMakes you think.
>>62450135Exactly. There is the door so would you kindly leave?
Kek my company banned it years ago when some high level executive fed sensitive financial data to chat gpt. It qas back when chat gpt was new and novel and he was probably a boomer that didn't know what chatbots are and thought it was a super intelligence.
