>Japanese financial giant SBI partners with Solana Foundation to build on-chain financial market in JapanLMAOOOO, XRP BAGGIES ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>62475081While ripple partners with nigger ball teams, their best “partners” build real shit on other chains, kek
>>62475081SBI is probably Ripple's biggest claim to fame, yet look at this shit.
>>62475247Yeah, they’ve been talking about how SBI and Ripple are best buddies and how they will run everything on XRPL for years, but look at that. Failure after failure, kek.
>>62475081The interconnected multi chain future is being build
>>62475081Linkie cope thread. They already use XRP in multiple of their divisions and have an XRP subsection in every shareholder report. They are Ripple's largest outside shareholder and formed a joint company with them for remittances in Asia called SBI Ripple Asia and give their tradfi depositors XRP incentives with Kitao regularly talking about XRP in shareholder meetings and thei CEO of Global Asset Management saying that "XRP is not just another crypto, this is the wealth transfer of a generation" (inb4 corny deliberate misreading characterizing this as the sort of extractive wealth transfer from bagholders that link is when that is clearly not what he meant). They issued their NFTs on the XRPL, partnered with arab royalty (both of which have execs transferring to management) on Vivo Power to drive XRP adoption etc. Pretty sure we're good as SBI is concerned. Lol>>62475247It isn't even close to their biggest claim to fame and Ripple themselves partner with CLL for price feeds for their ETH RLUSD product (which is the minor chain issued onto with most on the XRPL). Neither partnership means fucking anything for the price of the link token or link token holders which is why you are mad and made this post to cope. Lol
>>62476573>formed a joint company with them for remittances in Asia called SBI Ripple Asia... which is itself a massive failure.No wonder they're moving onto Solana and Chainlink.
As part of this partnership, the Solana Foundation will join SBI R3 Japan Co., Ltd. (Headquarters: Minato-ku, Tokyo; President and CEO: Mamoru Fujimoto; to be renamed "SBI Solana Global Co., Ltd." in the future) and, together with its shareholders SBI Holdings and Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "SMFG"), will promote a new growth strategy.https://www.sbigroup.co.jp/news/2026/0713_16478.htmlSBI has a long-standing strategic relationship with Ripple that predates the R3 JV: SBI invested in Ripple and created joint ventures such as SBI Ripple Asia to promote XRP-powered payments in Japan and the region, and SBI participated in cross-border payments trials with R3 Consortium members. https://www.sbigroup.co.jp/english/news/pdf/2016/0719_b_en.pdfThe irony of the fudcuck post is that the chainlink partnership enables ripple and solana. So far no entity took a sizeable stake in the chainlink token.
>>62476715I knew you would post the same photo with the same brown hands. You don't even know how to spell remittances. Its remittance arm, SBI Remit operate the largest volume ODL corridor in the world. It has processed a cumulative international volume of more than ¥2.5 trillion (approximately $15+ billion). It took SBI Remit 14 years to hit its first ¥2 trillion in volume but it accumulated its next ¥500 billion ($3.2 billion USD) in just 17 months as corridors rapidly scaled showing it is clearly growing in a non-linear clip as a business. You are posting a picture you are mischaracterizing the quote of from years ago. Today they connect over 100 institutions across 55+ countries. Further, Lol XRP (intentionally by design) doesn't have smart contracts, you fucking retard. Meanwhile:https://ripple.com/ripple-press/ripple-and-sbi-group-partner-to-launch-ripple-usd-in-japan/https://www.fintechobserver.com/sbi-ripple-asia-secures-regulatory-approval-for-xrp-ledger-based-prepaid-token-platform/
>>62476771This.
>>62476808>You are posting a picture you are mischaracterizing the quote of from years agoHis quote is from a video I once linked him (biepum). He took the first snippet of how they started and what the hard parts were when building (Banks make money off the "friction " of cross border payments, so they are not keen on throwing that profitable part out. Same as with the yield on stablecoins in USA). He loves to frame everything out of context and start the argument that way. Very jewish/jeetlike behavior. This type of discussion is literally all he has in life so go easy on him.
>verbo pretending to be two people again
>>62476914Biepum projecting again. Debate the person, not the matter , oi vey.
>>62476941There's nothing to debate.Even Ripple's most loyal partners and literal shareholders are going multichain.
>>62476967You act as if "the future is multichain" is some kind of gotcha.You came in to fud with out of context garbage (modus operandi of biepum the linktard) and are already resorting in weasling out by making a vague non argument statement. Post the collage you fudcuck. I know you have it.
>>62477005>You act as if "the future is multichain" is some kind of gotcha.it is if your whole premise for existing is "everyone will use us and nothing else".
>>62477013>co create the INTERledger protocol>fudcuck spins it to they only want 1 ledger to be used
>>62477051bro you're on soundcloud? What's your @ unironicallyAutists like you make the best bleeps and bloops.
>>62477074>please dox yourself so i can make another collage
>>62476862100% though I did not know the origin of his getting it. He used to do the exact same thing literally "very fine people" style with David's tweet about the value of XRP which literally had a second tweet in thread that explicitly proved him wrong and so many disingenuous faggots like him tried to selectively clip to fud David did a longform address to the claim outright contradicting it.
>>62476914I'm not samefagging you fucking NPC. I literally never samefag pretending to be anyone but me.
>>62476967Are you really so low IQ you would imagine that banks and financial institutions would confine their total business to not include smart contracts just to keep the pie chart of chains used all one color? Do you think they would similarly silo themselves to one chain's liquidity for same reason? Do you similarly believe Ripple and the XRPL would be increased by them doing this and not have dramatic reduction in pie radii by having such services ringfenced from them and given to competitors, remembering that XRP's whole core thesis is building out the interconnective cross-network liquidity/value layer? Are you really this stupid, do you not know this basic 101 level detail about or are you just coping by being disingenuous?
>>62477005
>>62475081I have 750 SOL. It's my smallest crypto bag. Will I make it?
>>62476573>Linkie cope thread>Posts a wall of cope
>>62479174>Has no argument, posts sophistry projection anyways to cope>So cooked a paragraph with no fluff which substantively addresses every point in an inarguable way is a "wall of text">Claims it isn't a linkie cope thread
>>62477396>I'm not samefagginglol>XRP's whole core thesis is building out the interconnective cross-network liquidity/value layerEach chain is its own liquidity layer, and without bridges each coin is confined to its own liquidity layer, including XRP.
>>62479334>Each chain is a walled gardenI know. Lol THAT IS THE FUCKING POINT. EVERY network is. And don't forget private chains. Ripple uses XRP to bridge corridors between them and can connect any network to any network using XRP using ILP, which was designed by Ripple devs for exaclty this purpose at the literal request of banks. They created an Eth version of RLUSD and partnered in interop with Wormhole for exactly this reason. INSANELY under-knowledgable.
Should i sell my xrp or just off myself
>>62481697Buy Gold before China does
>>62481682>Ripple uses XRP to bridge corridors between themXRP is a coin on a chain. It's just as much in a walled garden as literally any L1 coin. There is zero difference in basic functionality.
>>62481720Reread what I wrote and look up what ODL and Interledger Protocol are and how they relate to Ripple's payments business bridging disparate ledgers in tradfi already. Wtf do you think "internet of value" means? You are stating as objection what David Schwartz literally cited as being the core reason for XRP and has been talking about excessively for over a decade as "walled gardens." You faggots never do a single hour of research, you just emotionally lurch self-servingly and presume to be entitled to default rightness. To such an extent you will claim the purpose something exists for is the proof against it. It is so low IQ it is insane. You did the same thing when Ripple launched RLUSD, when it was literally a massive value add to our thesis and massively opening of institutional, dollar denominated flows (as will other fiat stables be) and porting liquidity from other networks. Kind of unreal how bad and inadequate you are at researching.
>>62481852See >>62481720Also see pic.Now fuck off.
>>62481900What do you think the pic proves. Interledger literally bridges any network fee-lessly and was developed by Ripple when asked by the banks for it. Ripple literally already uses the XRPL to intermediate networks. I don't even think you understand what idea you are challenging. Lol What about what David said is wrong or in any way challenging to what I said?
>>62482605>What do you think the pic proveslol>Interledger literally bridges any network fee-lessly and was developed by Ripple when asked by the banks for it. ILP is software that's independent of blockchain. It has no more inherently to do with XRP than it does with Bitcoin or Fartcoin.If you want exposure to the success of ILP, you can buy stock in Ripple. Not XRP.
>>62483623You could try answering the question or just admit you have no answer. Lol>ILPI know. Lol As I said, it was LITERALLY invented by Ripple for banks when asked to be chain agnostic and scale to trillions of tps using payment channels. It is a free use software which pays in whichever network you want in the fees associated across whichever networks you want hypothetically to settle. I don't know why you faggots all go from not knowing what something is to presuming to lecture on it despite knowing nothing about it. ILP's settlement engine is only coded for using XRP, BTC, ETH, or fiat network payments. So basically, presently, it is fiat or a much more liquid corridor established crypto asset which it was designed to scale the business case of in payments particularly, with the abillity to settle into and between tradfi payment networks with micropayment capable batching for zero additional software fee being free use. So definitely has more to do with XRP at the moment than Fartcoin. Lol The cope and unearned presumption is like how indians and jews and leftists act.
>>62484486You’re mixing history with architecture and pretending that proves your point. Yes, Ripple was involved in ILP’s creation, and yes, XRP can be used as a settlement asset. That does not mean ILP “was invented for banks to use XRP” or that it is “coded only” for XRP/BTC/ETH/fiat in any meaningful protocol-level sense. ILP is explicitly ledger-agnostic. Settlement engines are modular. XRP is one possible rail, not the point of the protocol. Saying ILP is more related to XRP than a random memecoin is obvious, but that’s a weak comparison, not proof of XRP dependency. Also, throwing slurs around doesn’t make the argument stronger. It makes it look like you’re trying to compensate for not understanding the difference between “historically associated with Ripple” and “architecturally dependent on XRP.”
Jesus this one riled them up
>>62484486The pic proves that there's a conflict of interests between Ripple's token holders and its shareholders.And Ripple's only fiduciary responsibility is to the latter.
>>62486046No it doesn't. Lol The two are literally alligned. can't say the same for link though. You are a massively disingenuous faggot and spiritual loser.
>>62485171David Schwartz's cousin was literally a co-creator of it. Why are you pretending like this is something you knew anything about 4 minutes ago and still is anything you know enough about to inform others on? Lol I literally made the case that ILP is ledger agnostic as the base case mentioning it here and across dozens of threads; banks asked Ripple to develop it for this purpose and to scale payments. I never said it was dependent on XRP. What the fuck are you talking about? I literally never said it was "architecturally dependent on XRP." You claiming I did is retarded, extremely disingenuous cope. I do not care to be lectured on vulgarity and well manneredness by a literal fucking jewish faggot who is literally just doing it to sophistically posture in argument in the same context of deliberately strawmanning me. Suck my shit in mental hell until you become a real person again. I said XRP is more relevant to it now (having existing usability) than Fartcoin (having no existing usability), pointing out that the other retard who may even also be you samefagging (changed ID to save face and continue same retarded argument?) who also doesn't know 101 of what ILP is or does presumed to lecture after reading a 20 second writeup which in his/your book is the sum length committed to learning anything, for some reason being REALLY sure of yourself that if you have less than 101 you can broad strokes argue around it. You can't; you are not a smart person and more importantly you are wrong and disingenuously/butthurt motivated.
>>62487308>The two are literally alligned.they really aren't.Selling tokens puts downward pressure on the token price, but upward pressure on the shares.Also, focusing on maximizing share value over token value leads to absurd situations like Ripple selling XRP to buy companies that don't use XRP but do provide revenues to Ripple and its shareholders.The two are diametrically opposed.
