This is just a limited run, so don't be shocked if the price dumps. The Clarity Act hasn't been passed yet, and staking still hasn't been released.
I’m ready to fuck
>>62479296you have had that cage on for so long can you even get erect anymore
>>62479295Will Linkies unironically kill themseleves when DTCC goes live and Chainlink crashes to $5? Gosh that would be hilarious. Imagine a bunch of third worlders and schizo firsties roping because they got scammed by a Russian conman.
Whats interesting is that they’ve achieved all the things everyone else promised. It’s like it’s the only thing worth holding because everything else is a huge scam.
>>62479513Yup which is why I'm all in but even so I still don't think we'll hit God candles until staking and the clarity act passes. I just buy weekly and ignore the news and fuddies.
>>62479357>calling white men firstieshow do I know you're brown and live in some shithole shack?
>>62479357Projecting again are we, fudcuck?Quick! You better go rush to doxx a linkie again. Hopefully you'll have more luck than finding a white STEM degree holder this time lol
>>62479513>It’s like it’s the only thing worth holding because everything else is a huge scam.lol! from the guy who just missed the last bullrun while down 80% what exactly are you even holding?
>>62479790>until staking and the clarity act passeswhat specifically in the current version of the clarity do you think causes upward price action?
>>62479817this lol
>>62480137>>62479817how many rupees is ChainlinkLabs paying you? Hope its worth it shitskins
>>62479790This is mainly to find the correct bps per mil transactions4.67 CCIP BPS is not what institutions will be paying, but the security angle is still there so we could see 0.02-0.07 per milDTCC does 2T a day btw
>>62480300The Clarity Act is important because it would provide a much clearer regulatory framework for cryptocurrency and establish clearer rules for the industry. That legal certainty is one of the biggest reasons many financial institutions have been cautious about fully embracing blockchain technology and tokenizing real-world assets. Especially since you see so many scams going on, and those influencers never see the inside of a jail cell. It makes it harder for businesses and banks to take crypto seriously and makes them hesitant because if the SEC decides to act against them, there are no clear rules to protect them from liability. Companies managing billions of dollars aren’t going to want to invest in new tech because, again, there are no clear rules. If the act passes then more institutions will feel comfortable using blockchain technology.
>>62480850>>62480300Banks and governments aren’t going to use shitcoins, they're going to build their own private chains. How will they interact with other banks that use their own private chains tho? Chainlink. There is no real competition to them. Look at all the others that promote interoperability and get hacked *cough wormhole. Swift has worked with Chainlink multiple times and has even attended their SmartCon, and invited Sergey to SIBOS. Nigga, Sirgay is the only one related to crypto to even attend Sibos. For any brain-dead anons, Sibos isn’t just a regular conference. It's arguably the largest banking conference in the world, attended by thousands of representatives from banks, central banks, market infrastructures, payment providers, and asset managers. If you want to use Chainlink’s services like ccip or cre then you need the token. Don’t have the token? Well they can buy it for you or convert it and charge you at a premium. Right now not a lot of companies are using the services because crypto is a joke and chainlink is using their own war chest of tokens instead of buying it off the market so there is no real demand for tokens FOR NOW. Chainlink is such an obvious bet if you think crypto will ever be adopted. Fuddies are successful because the price is horrible right now and has been for years. I'm still buying Chainlink with the meager savings I have, but even I know that this tokenization will probably do jack shit for the price.
>>62480850>>62480856High-IQ Anon. Are you an INTP ? Just checking.What do you aim for price ?
>>62480856>chainlink is using their own war chest of tokens instead of buying it off the market so there is no real demand for tokens FOR NOW.NINE MORE YEARS MARINES, JUST BE PATIENT & TRVST THE PLVN
>>62482570No idea what intp means. There is no true way to guess how much Link can cost in the future. Your guess is as good as mine. I'll continue to buy at these prices and will continue to do so as it dumps. I don't intend on selling in a long time since I think Chainlink has just as much if not more potential than NVIDIA. Eventually people invested into crypto and outside the crypto space will feel dumb for not seeing the obvious signs and call us lucky.
>>62479295ngl I stayed up at night to watch the price at launch. Why didn't it go up? Everyone has been saying it would for 2 years now and hyping this on par with SWIFT. Does this mean SWIFT will also not increase the link price?
>>62479295> 3 more months
>>62483196Surely if it went live at midnight then it won' get used till the next day presumably? Anyways sounds lime a nothingburger if it's only live for piloting and not real volume
>>62480850>>62480856>keeps posting pictures of CLL's fat russian founder depicted as a king>groveling at his feet and doing free advertisement for his company while he keeps all the profits>totally not a cultMentally buck broken. Literal cattle followers. Do you understand why everyone calls you the cuckolds of crypto?
>>62479295>The DTCC news are a nothing burgerYou mean to tell me that no one cares about the one thing that has been shitting up the board for the past couple weeks? It's almost like it was a couple desperate baggies, possibly a jannie, wanting us to buy their bags. Unbelievable!
>>62483446>DTCC adoption badNah you're just mad XRP isn't involved
>>62483448idgaf about link, xrp, everest, or any of that other shit. Crypto is fucking retarded and thankfully there's no one left to farm. Fake pump this shit all you want, no one is taking the bait
>>62483486Then why did you open this thread? I don't really care about precious metals or stocks (though I do hold silver and invest in ETFs), so I don't open threads discussing those topics. Ragebaiting yourself is some next level normie behavior
>>62483486>>62483701>Then why did you open this thread?Because he's an XRPfag
>>62483361I thought people would buy link in anticipation of it at the final moment and we would finally have the or at least a switch flipped.
two more weeks!
>>62483701Well, >>62483446 has a point. The DTCC bullshit was being shilled hard and it turned out to be a nothing burger, like all things crypto related. It only makes sense to come in a thread that’s titled ‘dtcc news nothing burger’ to have fun with the baggies, which would be you. Oh, and >>62483718. That one is seething hard kek
the email they sent out this morning says it's over 30 firms for this limited production july launch.
>>62483814Tonight!
>>62483904>DTCC bullshitt. seething cripplet
>>62479295>staking still hasn't been releasedStaking has been released though. Its literally done and dusted
>>62483940Retard sslinkie you've been trying to do this "if you're not a link baggie then you're with XRP" thing in every thread
>>62484636Nobody on earth has any reason to be upset at this DTCC thing, only cripplets as they're not involved at all despite years of gaslighting that they are.
>>62484709The issue is you're getting mad defensive about LINK even after we are telling you it's a scamThey limited staking to 4.5% after promising "you'll be able to stake"Then they stopped using LINK for data feedsThey dump 15m coins per QThey lied about "buying back" Its like talking to a weed smoker, telling them "hey maybe you should cut out the weed because it's bad for you"Then they start going sick about it being good for them, "you don't understand", "WelL itS BetteR than DriNKing" (XRP)But we're not taking about XRP, are we?I understand that you're in to deep. I understand you're emotionally tied to your bags. But there comes a point where you need to realise that you're promoting a pyramid scheme
>>62484800>posts wall of butthurt>"you're getting mad defensive"k
>>62480850>>62480856> That legal certainty is one of the biggest reasons many financial institutions have been cautious about fully embracing blockchain technology and tokenizing real-world assets.then how was dtcc able to go "live" or whatever they did today? no new bills have been passed and yet they moved forward>Companies managing billions of dollars aren’t going to want to invest in new tech because, again, there are no clear rules. oh really dude? what new regulations came out regarding ai that made every single tech company in the world go all in? do you even hear yourself>If the act passes then more institutions will feel comfortable using blockchain technology.if you say so, but this has nothing to do with link coin
>>62483448>>62483718>>62483940>>62484709>>62484824>n..nooo! I’m not seething, y..you are! Faggooottt!!kek baggie
>>62480856>If you want to use Chainlink’s services like ccip or cre then you need the tokenno you don't. a bank will never, at any time in the future, purchase link token >Don’t have the token? Well they can buy it for you or convert it and charge you at a premiumthey convert it from their own supply and pocket the cash. this does nothing for link pricemy original question was how does clarity act help price action, and i didnt get much from your answer. it seems you are relying on blind faith that this bill will magically make banks pay chainink and then somehow that gets paid out to you?
>>62485416On the 2nd point. What happens when their services are in demand (as you acknowledge they are) but all link has been circulated and they have none left to allocate for free?
>>62485398>>62485415>>62485416heard the news yet, xerpies?
>>62485453look their work with XRP is behind many NDAs ok
>>62485453why isn't your shitcoin pumping then?
>>62479295i knew it was october. my fortune cookie told me.
