So it's finally live but how come the price is still stuck around $1.10? You told me this would make it moon.
>>62483008I am convinced the DTCC meme is pushed by linkies to make it seem like XRP investors are just magically expecting its use immediately. I never saw any XRP posters even talk about it nor any mention on this board until these posts which directly mirror the low effort linkie boom posts tha spam this board. Nothing will happen on this date for XRP imo. linkies on the other hand have been shilling this for over a year as their top 1 of 2 things.
>>62483181Kek xrp baggiesTHE KEKHOLDS of crypto
>>62483187Projection and cope is all that linkies know how to do. I literally had zero expectation from the DTCC live with zero announcement of them even working with Ripple or using the XRPL outside the broker dealer Ripple owns which uses the XRPL which is a DTCC participant. Meanwhile linkies have been shilling this shit for fucking ever and nothing happened for them. Acting this way now is on par with flooding 20,000 Haitians into Springfield, Ohio with no one wanting it and everyone hating and actively opposing it and then running the headline "Trump threatens to deport 20% of Ohio city" to gaslight and anchor the consequence past action as the new baseline. Very jewish of you to do.
>>62483181>>62483194I use literally to harden and anchor the actual objectivity of what I write to punctuate each point to remind faggots like you not everyone is just gushing team sports slop and there is an actual reality despite your persistent, deep attempt to repress it in yourself and repress its expression to others. This entire schtick is so fucking stupid and low effort/IQ. "Oooooh I don't like that you proved me wrong so you're a russian bot oh and did you know Trump said they were very fine people!!!!!" It is literally indistinguishable from this level of rhetoric. Why would I rewrite the same information multiple times which you are unable to engage with and spend valuable time of my life redundantly generating the same framed concept when I can just reshare it? Lol You spend hours sperging and never comment on ANYTHING substantial claimed and call me effeminate but literally just do lefty hivemind power messaging tactics to try to save face in arguments you admit to yourself and everyone you can't win. The irony is in all of your accusation you are literally an NPC in human bot form, and despite this all, the same way you tacitly admit that you know your position is indefensible by being this way, you also admit you recognize our argumentative supremacy over you by (probably totally unknown to you) absorbing specific terminology used to try to superficially emulate us through osmosis thinking using these words will transfer the value of what we say when the whole point is that we are right on substance and you have nothing to say and don't care what's true and it doesn't matter which words you use to express this. REALLY fucking gay way to live and be and if you are a paid poster, which is very possible, you are a spineless plague rat of jews with negative value, add into the world and a shame to your ancestors
>>62483209Stage 4 butthurt linkie coper
Not reading your diary, learn to summarize.
>>62483187
>>62483220I'm not a copy paster, you retarded fucking nigger. I repost the same post I originally wrote because you repressed niggers have NO response for it and because you literally don't care what's real ALWAYS cope by playing gay literal 2016 leftist tier rhetoric games to try to have me reputationally or socially dismissed because you can't reply to the argument and you know your investment is indefensibly incoherent and literally fucking retarded. You disingenuous, sniveling fucking kike, I did not post the same thing in the same thread. (You) copypasted my post because you are a fucking kike wanting to continue to shill your shitty no utility project and by arguing this way tacitly and nakedly admit that you have ZERO argument, don't understand your own tech, and most importantly know this and that your investment thesis is a retarded, demoralized corporate findom arrangement literally no exaggeration and you know you have no ability to even begin to argue after trying and getting REKT across 200 threads straight, so you do gay underhanded jew/leftist muh russian bots style messaging strategies to try to sophistically color, around the shape and hope that everyone accepts your social proof window dressing/papering over, with your literal goal being that they don't consider the actual facts of the matter as they relate to xrp and how retarded and literally incoherent the bull thesis is for it. With the cross-asset crash you are getting another chance to pick better after the long slog of failure you have crystalized and instad of choosing it you are choosing to double down and signal consensus/compliance with the gayest subculture to ever exist. You would LITERALLY rather not make it than just admit you were wrong about the thing that has financially devastated your savings more than anything ever has. I literally cannot imagine the lived nigger Hell of being you and how repressed and defense mechanism hard
>>62483223Pic related is since most recent cycle change.
>>62483229Kek all those years waiting for a 100% pump
>>62483221It is a linkie that spends hours copypasting and ID hopping old posts to cope and bury actual discussion because they always lose and he has chosen to cope this way. Literally no exaggeration, it is that dumb and purposeless. What a waste of a life. Lol
>>62483181>it's Linkies fault that XRP investors are so insanely retarded
>>62483230The reason I invested hasn't even begun to happen in markets yet and is literally just starting to. I am up several fold on my investment while the average board link investor bought at a 50% loss minimum.>>62483228see>>62483220
>>62483236Cope
>>62483220>>62483229>>62483232>>62483236How are you responding almost always literally within an hour day or night of every post I make across several days? In what world do you think this looks organic? I usually reply like once a day and you are on standby being woken up by alarmed notification when I make a post, TOTALLY organic and non-indian singular individual. Your posts don't "offer" clear or concise arguments and they definitely don't offer facts. You have gotten wrong almost literally everything, down to citing what are and aren't Ripple's products, reasoned completely retardedly in terms of them, avoided all actual argument, and are now pivoting to the common refrain of "argument I can't address is le word salad!" People who cannot argue and do not understand informal fallacies always invoke the same handful (ad hom, gish gallop, strawman) and add "word salad" like they are meaning-arbitrary rhetorical devices that allow you to editorialize something you can't address into being incoherent or invalid in some way which grants you to dismiss it without having to by casting a magic spell by using these words like you are a leftist or jew calling me a "fascist" or something. You LITERALLY are just mad you got embarrassed in terms of your project REALLY bad and now are here defiant posting and projecting as the lowest IQ form of cope, larping as actual interrogation through self-description to try to dress it up not realizing saying something is something while demonstrating it not to be doesn't work to non-entrenched retards already agreeing with you, or recognizing the irony of how this same characteristic form portrays why you bought link and defend it so LITERALLY religiously in the first place. If link served some moral purpose or something I would understand partially but it isn't even a good product. It is literally the single biggest portrayal of jewish rent seeking aimed at entrenching itself in core services. You are neither smart nor good.
>>62483240Bladdy benchod fuck you benchod I have sex with your sister bladdy
>>62483235Not sure why my post is being flagged but see pic related.
>>62483239With what, myself EXTREMELY successfully investing, massively outperforming virtually everything across the time horizon I have held it while the people who disgust me and try to deliberately lead others astray fail miserably with zero prospect to recover or actual utility to look forward to? Lol Pretty easy to cope with!
>>62483240see>>62483220
>>62483249You call that extremely successful investing
>>62483248>it's just tweets from random faggotsit's pretty much the entire XRP "community" on twitter.It's also the CEO himself saying this retarded shit.You yourself are also constantly going on about all muh banks using XRP when it's clearly not true.
>>62483248>>62483249>>62483252>>62483256See what I mean? You are literally claiming you are doing the exact thing I was doing to you which you earlier said I was being emotional for doing, which you are also claiming here Lol It takes me less than a minute to copy paste a post. I have spent literally hours engaging in argument in threads and only started after IEXEC faggots started onslaught brigading every single thread that mentioned ADA. At first they argued but after losing BAD for several dozen threads they pivoted to this gay shit and making ADA threads satirizing the corniest type of ADA investor, which every coin community has people exactly like, acting like it is specific to ADA or even common to it. You think you are entitled to being considered automatically reasonable by fiat of nothing other than being you and a member of the culture which you are and think you are coming across as even keel and above it all but your posts are saturated in your own purposeless disdain and butthurt which you cannot even help but ejaculate here. The purpose of your reply is not to correct an error in concept or even impart insight of any sort, it is just to vent because you lack low level regulation skills, and to be a power signal for your culture in a way you think is stronger than the cruder formations of those doing exactly what you are. You are right, yours is better, but it is not different substantively and is just a very slightly higher IQ version which presumes itself to be a MUCH higher IQ version which doesn't betray itself or whatever extent of itself you are self-aware of which could be betrayed which isn't just gush and self-satisfaction and circle jerking with other linkies into each others' mouths. I honestly don't even myself spend THAT much time here. I have in the past for sure, particularly during the time mentioned, which outcome through sheer virtue of total transparent demonstration of the incoherence and baselessness of your guys' thesis led
>>62483264Lol What? Brad's claim has literally nothing to do with the DTCC claim. You are desperately reaching for cope after the DTCC thing date meant nothing for link. Brad's claim is true. They are a disruptor in payments the way Uber was in transportation. They offer a better service with superior tech and there is zero benefit to the consortium trust model anymore when you can automate it in a scalable way and increase your operational efficiency cost and speed while doing so. SWIFT dropped the ball SO bad they literally fired their Chief Innovation Officer because he failed to anticipate the most OBVIOUS and only sector development in 70 years (literally, SWIFT currently use fax machine era messaging tech) that anyone in his position had to notice and failed to compensate by competitive innovation afterward. SWIFT might have had the biggest moat in world history, bigger than Google in search or Blockbuster in movie rentals, and he failed THIS bad possibly hoping to maintain the chokeheld institutional model with the lawfare and private chains he saw happening, which failed and backfired and which models are being abandoned and failed also. That doesn't mean all payments will route through XRPL overnight or even in short order, but it will gradually distribute to them and others who have zero incentive to keep the counterparty intensive and technically inferior model going, especially large institutions and sovereigns. Payments in the US aren't even broadly accessible to crypto yet legally. I think Brad predicted something like 14% of SWIFT would be migrated to Ripple by 2030. Ripple are already able to make payments through SWIFT and are partnered with multiple Fed Now service providers, some of which actually literally run XRPL nodes. Lol The future is now, old man.>>62483265see>>62483220
>>62483008That's it, I'm selling all my stack!
>>62483264Also multiple banks use XRP. What are you talking about? They mostly can't yet in the US legally use any crypto as such but globally many already do. You not liking something being true doesn't change that it is.
>>62483275>Brad's claim has literally nothing to do with the DTCC claim.Brad is constantly making grandiose claims about either working with the biggest financial players, or somehow taking them over.And obviously neither are ever true.The fact that all of the XRP community believes Ripple is deeply involved with DTCC is a natural extension of that.>>62483279>multiple banks use XRPIn 2018 Brad said "over a hundred", including some of the biggest banks in the world.That was a lie then, and it's still not even remotely true now.
>>62483256I objectively outperformed every legendary investor lauded as a stud's most sophisticated strategies and you objectively underperformed a dollar held in a bank paying no interest being eaten away by inflation.
>>62483279>>62483282Just so you know >>62483275 is a faggot who is literally incapable of any pushback whatsoever and somehow thinks copypastaing past posts of mine is an own or something. Lol I honestly have no idea what they think it achieves but probably it is just telling themselves they did something therefore it is sufficient which is just the basis they need to will cognitive dissonance from conscious awareness. It means that since the last time the entire market meaningfully shifted across all tokens, restructuring into a completely new paradigm vis-a-vis institutional/government level legitimacy, after similarly moving in lockstep in a less performative way, XRP is the only to meaningfully keep its gains at that exact point. Random moving averages or x to date pictures mean nothing vs. cycle to date or pivotal market moments to date. I am not cherrypicking, I am literally choosing the moment everything changed and Chokepoint 2.0/Gensler was priced in as dead and how assets have behaved since then. It isn't arbitrary, you just don 't like that it is true. You should check out Hedgeye's commentary on YTD vs. cycle to date to become a non-macro casual and slightly less economically retarded. Again, I LITERALLY granularly argued the tech itself for dozens of threads across months and you niggers eventually just pivoted to argument avoidance which is how we are where we are now, which is usually just me granularly describing why we are here and what you are doing and why. It is funny you critique my diction and writing but yourself write in a very stilted way that is clearly aiming to be superficially on some sort of level you think an imagined brilliance will shine through (as opposed to and in contrast to me!) but you really don't say anything yourself and take 2 paragraphs to do so. Also ironic you criticize me for using "buzzwords and misunderstood concepts and bitterness and insecurity" but this is literally your motivating force
The dtcc is xrp posting now
>>62483281>DtccYou didn't really write anything substantive here for me to address or even reply to, you just said something was obvious despite zero argument and then tried to do the biggest reach I can think of to pin this to the DTCC which is something like "my brother said he would kick my ass if she ever saw me do x, therefore he is clearly a suspect for murder of someone a town over who we vaguely associate with.">banksAgain, shifting claims. You went from saying I claimed banks use them (many do, settling billions of cumulative dollars using XRP) to what Brad said, which was itself true and remains true today. When he said that, it was pre-lawsuit, and Bank of America were a partner. Today, multiple of the largest banks are partners across their payments and custody businesses. SABB, BBVA, SBI (huge partner and largest outside shareholder, who through joint operating SBI Ripple Asia operate the largest active and cumulative ODL corridor), QNB, Citi, BNP Paribas, DZ Bank, MUFG, they partnered with DBS Bank (largest bank in Singapore (the Switzerland of Asia)) and Franklin Templeton (more than a trillion dollars AUM) to launch a repo market on the XRPL, they partnered with ONDO and worked with them and JP Morgan to settle the first treasury onchain (which was done on the XRPL btw). Others they work with are very large extension services and companies that reach very deep without being big names or banks themselves, like Bank Social, Thunes, etc. They are partnered with hundreds of payments companies and banks, objectively, and per Brad (who has to give financial disclosures and shareholder disclosures) have seen the fastest acceleration in adoption they ever have. Additionally, as mentioned, they own and operate two multi trillion dollars settled a year businesses which manage the treasury payments of dozens of Fortune 1000 companies and many major banks and settle trades for clients using XRPL for post trade settlement. This is all very knowable
>>62483187this lol
>>62483281>>62483309cont. you just literally pretend to not know it and because you are in stuck in a weird lefty style mentality you just assume for no reason that even though you know I am right, I am somehow socially wrong in a way that matters more because I do not reinforce the dogma you have stuck to. I can identify multiple of you by who you are from past interactions and genuinely you are imminently capable of being better than this. It is a choice and you are not that far gone, you just have to be willing to admit it once.
>>62483281>>62483312admit it to yourself I mean.* I don't care if you don't say anything to me and am not looking for public contrition or flogging. I genuinely hope you (all of you) find your way out of this, sincerely.
>>62483287You have wasted time hopping over 100 IDs in the last day alone instead of just admitting you are wrong to yourself.
>>62483287also, see >>62483220
>>62483309>SBI (huge partner and largest outside shareholder, who through joint operating SBI Ripple Asia operate the largest active and cumulative ODL corridor)This ODL corridor is a handful of local banks in the Japanese countryside, according to SBI Ripple Asia.>Bank of America were a partner.source? (other than Ripple itself, obviously)>multiple of the largest banks are partners across their payments and custody businesses. SABB, BBVA, SBI, QNB, Citi, BNP Paribas, DZ Bank, MUFGI've never heard of most of these, but Citi and BNP Paribas are definitely not using Ripple.You're a grandiose liar, just like the Ripplefags who keep spamming that Ripple is tied in with DTCC and Swift, and just like Brad.
>>62483305Wtf, no way.... THE PROOF IS IN THE PUDDING, GUYS! HOW CAN PEOPLE DON'T SEE?!?!? I JUST FELL OUT OF MY CHAIR ON PURPOSE, I JUST CAN'T BELIEVE MY EYES!!!!!!!!!! THE RIDDLERS HAVE BEEN RIGHT ALL ALONGE!!!!!!!! BEARABLEGUY123!!!! MR.POOL!!!! WHAT HAVE WE BEEN SAYING ALL THESE YEARS, GUYS?!?!? THE MOON IS IMMINENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXWwcR7nJJ4
oh wow, another nothingburger memedate, who could've seen this one coming?
>>62483275This is how xrp holders think. With absolutely no evidence to back it up.Top Kek. Totally oneshotted
>>62483330It has processed a cumulative international volume of more than ¥2.5 trillion (approximately $15+ billion). It took SBI Remit 14 years to hit its first ¥2 trillion in volume but it accumulated its next ¥500 billion ($3.2 billion USD) in just 17 months as corridors rapidly scaled showing it is clearly growing in a non-linear clip as a business. You are posting a picture you are mischaracterizing the quote of from years ago. Today they connect over 100 institutions across 55+ countries. Why be dishonest?>BoABank of America has been a member of RippleNet’s steering committee since at least 2016. In 2017, BofA filed a patent for a real-time interbank settlement system. The filing explicitly referenced a "ripple" distributed ledger, using the phrase "prefunded ripple settlements." The 13F Disclosure: A Form 13F-HR regulatory filing submitted to the U.S. SEC on February 3, 2026, confirmed that Bank of America holds approximately 13,000 shares of the Volatility Shares XRP ETF. According to Ripple’s official public directories, Bank of America is an active member of RippleNet, which no BoA official has ever challenged or sued based on even during the suit, but here you go from Bank of America themselves (pic related):https://www.fxstreet.com/cryptocurrencies/news/bank-of-america-exec-discusses-the-banks-partnership-with-ripple-202004100242>Never hear ofAgain, your not knowing doesn't make them not large. ONDO is the private equity collective of Black Rock, Franklin Templeton (same from DBS partnership), Wisdom Tree, and State Street (most of the largest private equity in the US) BBVA is. SABB is Saudi Arabia’s leading private-sector bank and second largest by assets in the Kingdom. QNB is Qatar’s (another large financial hub) largest bank. It is Largest bank in the MENA region by assets. BBVA is the 15th-20th largest bank globally. Roughly $1.006 trillion total assets. It is one of Spain’s two dominant banks.
>>62483330>>62483346cont. BNP Paribas is the 7th largest bank globally. Total assets of roughly $3.28 trillion. It is Europe’s largest bank by assets and a one of the top corporate and investment banks in the world. DZ Bank is Germany’s second largest banking group (after cooperative network consolidation). Total assets of roughly $776 billion. MUFG is the 11th largest bank globally. Total assets roughly $2.67 trillion. It is Japan’s largest bank.Once more: You not knowing something and presuming to not need to or to being right despite what is true, it mattering less for social reasons, doesn't mean much and is the issue at the heart of most of the misunderstanding in your life.>>62483340See the earlier part of this post as well as >>62483346 and cope hard at the failure of your own projection.
>>62483346>You are posting a picture botty broke lol>>62483351I'm not reading your wall of cope by the way. The only relevant names you dropped are Citi, Bofa, and BNP Paribas, and none of them have ever used Ripple.So why did Brad claim in 2018 that the biggest Swift-connected institutions are using Ripple?Because he's a grandiose liar.
>>62483346>>62483330Sorry, disregard the "picture" part. I copypasted from a prior reply I wrote and forgot to delete that part. You guys literally just repeat the same 10 claims over and over as you know after having it disproven to you and then spamming again hoping for a thread where it isn't. Much easier to just pasta you because you never actually argue or say anything new.
>>62483356Not a bot. Lol You are LITERALLY willfully repressing being OBJECTIVELY proven wrong to try to paper over it with sophistry now. Why do you not care what's true? Like genuinely, why would you not care? Eventually whatever narrative you tell yourself rubber meets the road and reality takes hold. You aren't even getting pre-reality speculation gains here, you are just getting rekt with zero prospect to not be. Why would you upon learning you are wrong not change tact but instead dig in on something you decided earlier just because you did it earlier? This is jew/boomer/leftist tier shit.
>>62483365XRP twittertards spread grandiose lies about Swift, DTCC, ...Brad spreads grandiose lies about Swift, big banks, ...You spread grandiose lies about Citi, BNP Paribas, BofA, ...notice a pattern?
>>62483356I literally gave you a link and then went on to include a pic of the specific quote WHICH I EVEN HIGHLIGHTED where a BofA exec literally says they were partnered with Ripple. You are past the "he said very fine people" level of cope and willed repression. What are you talking about.>BNP Paribas (Metaco is Ripple's custody company and wholly owned subsidiary, part of their end-to-end corporate build out. Harmonize is their product):https://securities.cib.bnpparibas/bnp-paribas-securities-services-to-develop-digital-assets-custody-capabilities-through-partnerships-with-metaco-and-fireblocks/>Citihttps://www.citigroup.com/global/news/press-release/2022/citi-partners-with-metaco-to-develop-institutional-digital-asset-custody-capabilities
>>62483374Cope and see>>62483387
>>62483008>full service to start in October
>>62483387>BofA exec literally says they were partnered with RippleI'm sure they had some tangential presence on some Ripple board, but they never used anything from Ripple.>BNP Paribas and Citi are connected through MetacoMetaco is a tradfi company that Ripple bought, and that still very much operates 100% as a tradfi company.It has nothing functionally to do with Ripple or XRP.This is EXACTLY the same reasoning twittertards use to claim DTCC and Swift are going to use XRP.
>>62483396I literally gave you a quote of her describing being partnered with them in payments.>MetacoI know. Lol 10 seconds ago you'd never even researched the term Metaco and you did for 10 seconds and now presume to lecture me on it citing exactly what I told you as somehowa proof against me. It is an institutional custody company which Ripple owns and operates as part of their product suite. You are really poor at categorical thinking and really undeservedly confident in your own categorical thinking. I haven't claimed a single thing that isn't true or even stretched the truth. You have done both of those things in this post alone and claimed that Brad claiming that they are competing to take share from SWIFT is demonstration that we all believe that the DTCC would use XRP imminently. Lol It is hard to say that irony/hypocrisy/projection is enough to describe this because it seems to be at such a scale it should have its own special word.
>>62483396Metaco is literally called "Ripple Custody" now btw. Lol
XRP_God and ChainlinkGod are absolutely seething at this news check Twitter formerly X my based redpilled chads
>>62483412>>62483415So strange, you're agreeing with everything I said but still trying to frame it as a rebuttal.
>>62483420Even more ironic than that: You are doing exactly what you are accusing me of while then accusing me of doing it in a meta way. Again, irony, hypocrisy and projection are not large enough to ensconce something so profoundly repressed and avoidant and guilty and jewish. You claimed we claimed DTCC day would flip the switch; I argued against that. As proof to contrary you said Brad's swift claim is proof of it somehow? Lol And then you claimed banks don't use Ripple; I gave a breakdown of several very large ones that do. You said "I ain't reading that" because you didn't know how to even disingenuously spin it and clung to claims about 3 banks all of which were partnered in all of the exact ways I said. You did the equivalent of someone showing the full "very fine people" speech to a leftist claiming Trump said "very fine people" and pretended the quote was not real or something? For the other two banks you stated literally exactly what I said in a weird unneeded summary statement about Metaco being an institutional custody subsidiary of Ripple and then said that their partnership has nothing to do with Ripple. It is SO dizzily spun and wilfully repressed it is almost literally impossible someone could be so deliberately disingenuous and aggressively truth avoidant and literally defies terminology. You LITERALLY deserve your own word for how absurdly cuckolded you are on a soul level by a fucking jew coin cult.
>>62483420>>62483425Forgot to add: Then you go on to accuse me of doing the whole construct of exactly what you are to add a meta layer.>inb4 "I ain't reading all that!" cope. Lol
>>62483425>>62483428>twittertards connect Ripple to DTCC via tradfi company Ripple bought (Prime)>"that's so retarded it has to be a linkie psyop!">you connect Ripple to Citi and BNP Paribas via tradfi company Ripple bought (Metaco)>"this is fine"You're a big fat grandiose liar, verbo.
>>62483434Metaco is LITERALLY Ripple. Wtf are you talkign about? Their entire business is an end-to-end solution suite with broker dealer, payments (Ripple Payments), custody and banking (Metaco and Standard Custody), wallet solutions (Palisades), stablecoins (Rail and RLUSD). This is INSANE cope.
>>62483440broker dealer (Ripple Prime)*
>>62483440>Metaco is LITERALLY Ripple.It's a tradfi company that Ripple bought, and that still functions exactly as it did before.And it doesn't use XRP in any way.It's fantastic news for Ripple stockholders though, who Ripple even admits they prioritize over token holders.
>>62483445I never said it did? Lol I listed it in >>62483309 saying "multiple of the largest banks are partners across their payments and CUSTODY businesses" and then went on to list the banks in response to you claiming that no banks are partnered with Ripple. You also then went on to ignore the other banks that are partnered in payments of which there are many settling billions of dollars in a business that is accelerating in key corridors claiming you "didn't recognize them." I then went on to detail specifically how they are some of the largest banks in the world and you said "I'm not reading that." Lol You are a literal bottomlessly depraved and demoralized fucking NPC for a corporation that literally cuckolded your sould and savings.
>>62483445Every company prioritizes shareholders over token holders by the way, you fucking retard. They are literally legally obligated to. Saylor, CLL, etc. The difference is while CLL built for shareholders in no way building out for token holders other than to fundraise by selling directly to retail, Ripple are building their whole core business around the XRPL and the more it scales by the mechanical nature of its own purpose the more its utility driven liquidity and market-making requirements do. Link is literally just an arbitrary, random blockchain minted toll booth token with zero utility or purpose to exist beyond jewish rent seeking and extraction from cultist retail nonentities like you. XRP mechanically solves problems and is the only permissionless asset that will ever exist on the XRPL and auto-bridges as default with pathfinding and a protocol level dex/AMM, scaling at L1, liquid against all assets with assets issued on chain sharing compliance standards at a protocol level, bridged by XRP, which can also be used to liquidly disintermediate frictions and pain points in payments etc. The token itself is useful and the company itself is scaling services and building a corporate structure around the token instead of messaging to holders to buy more while abandoning them in the plumbing of their build like CLL are doing to link holders.
>>62483454You said "multiple banks use XRP", and when pressed on that claim you suddenly shift to Ripple products that don't use XRP.This is exactly why people hate you jews.And back when Brad made those claims about all those big banks, Ripple hadn't bought Hidden Road or Metaco yet, meaning literally zero big banks were using anything Ripple.>>62483463>Every company prioritizes shareholders over token holdersAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHYeah, no they don't. Ripple is pretty much the only crypto project that does this to my knowledge.
>>62483467>multiple banksOkay this is actually a semi fair point, I see where the wires can be construably crossed on this point particularly. Multiple banks do use XRP. I misinterpreted what you meant because Brad said multiple banks are Ripple partners (which they are). You blended two claims into one. I said multiple banks use XRP (which they do (though, again for legal reasons in international ops not all of those listed, SBI being of the listed ones one which does extensively).>Not knowing what a fiduciary duty ishttps://www.dol.gov/general/topic/retirement/fiduciaryresp (also see pic related)Again, the difference is that what is good for XRP holders is good for Ripple shareholders and vice versa because XRP is the technology justifying the company's existence. CLL could drop the link token tomorrow (as they already have in everything but explicit declaration) and nothing would change. This really isn't hard to understand. Ripple success scales XRP success in every area of business (some indirectly through just onboarded liquidity and platforming). This is a fucked thing to commit your life to shilling and being a nonentity sophistry shocktroop for. Just to really concretely anchor the point: If any crypto company executive came out and said they were not prioritizing shareholders against token holders or even practiced their business such that that was obvious, they could be sued into oblivion and could in certain cases be accelerated out of civil court and into criminal court.
>>62483467aka You posting the petulant stream of all caps lulz is more a pronouncement of you not knowing something EXTREMELY basic to ALL corporations. Again, "to your knowledge," a majority of your (specifically your) problems and frustrations in life come from you not knowing important things and forming undeservedly confident and smug conclusions around that not knowing. This is another example of you smugly declaring how you owned me when you are really just shrilly and pretty funnily announcing how you don't know basic shit you need towhich anyone who has taken a literal intro to business at a shitty adult learning class would know while knowing very little else.
>>62483467>>62483475Sorry accidentally screenshotted bad link just fast clicking and not looking at it. It is same principle but better and more directly described here:https://ceb.com/blog/exploring-fiduciary-duties-in-corporate-governance/
>>62483475>>62483479>>62483488Imagine actually defending a crypto dealing in both tokens and company shares.Protip: whenever Ripple sells XRP, that's insanely good for stockholders as it means more revenue, but bad for token holders as it means sell pressure.There's a direct conflict of interests.Not to mention it almost completely removes any incentive for Ripple to actually involve XRP in any of their businesses.
>>62483506Imagine thinking it is a bad thing that a corporation of the success of scale and end-to-end strategy described priorly building its entire product suite around the express purpose of using and scaling the software you invested in is a bad thing.Protip: Ripple sales account for less than half of 1% of total volume consistently and are not done to retail and are done exclusively to institutional clients in demand neutral transactions which have virtually no impact on the price and help fund the aforementioned greatest corporate advocate basically conceivable who also risked themselves as individuals (Brad and Chris) when they were attached to the lawsuit as an intimidation strategy and spent $150M and 5 years litigating the legality of your software while all regulators conspired to give a free pass to its competitor and stifle all actual competition because the competitor could not compete from a tech standpoint, which stuck with it despite being told they could settle up front for much less and zero court fees and 5 years of no lawsuit hanging over the at the time much smaller business and all they had to do was abandon claiming XRP is not a security, who also advocate for you at the White House, helping write the market structure legislation with congress etc. They literally risked viewed XRP as so valuable to their business that they risked their entire business and personal selves as attached parties to preserve its legal use and clarity as non-security. Not to mention (again) Ripple literally built their entire business around XRP and their products become worse and less attractive when it is not used which hurts shareholders (which is why they fought the suit-value is not as retardedly shape meets hole discernible as your model produces), meanwhile link randomly created a token to fundraise that has no utility and is not being developed to have any and has zero projects in the pipeline to drive it to with all past flopping or being abandoned
>>62483506You are literally repeating one of 10 talking points that have been smacked down 1000 times on this board but are still repeated and re-repeated by low IQ retards who can't think beyond 2 circle Venn diagrams but think they are deep, incisive wells of alpha. Lol
>>62483229Looks like it’s about to moon.
>>62483646>>62483653>Ripple sales account for less than half of 1% of total volume That's true for pretty much all cryptos.You're a disgusting paid shill.
>>62483646Ripple has a fiduciary duty towards their shareholders. They have precisely 0 fiduciary duty towards their token holders. Who do you think is getting dumped on and used as paypigs in this scenario? Everything you've been saying about CLL and LINK holders is actually true for Ripple Labs and XRP holders, what the actual fuck. Your delusion runs a lot deeper than I thought.
>>62483664>Everything you've been saying about CLL and LINK holders is actually true for Ripple Labs and XRP holdersThat's a big part of what exposed all those legacy Link fudders as being XRP holders: literally all of the main fud talking points actually apply to Ripple/XRP instead. That's where they get their inspiration.And obviously when you point this out, they lose their minds and start vehemently defending cripple, unmasking themselves.
>>62483664>Crypto companies have no fiduciary duty to token holder.No fucking DUH. MY LITERAL POINT. But Ripple specifically in the ways described have shown how aligned token holder interest is with shareholder interest, because the token catalyzes their core business.>Everything is trueI literally explicitly describe the difference and how one builds around a technology that exists and solves problems and the other randomly issues an arbitrarily Eth shitcoin that has zero utility and is not being scaled in any way.>>62483659Again with the hypocrisy and projection and irony. I never said otherwise. You made the claim about their sales being significant. I demonstrated they are not. You said, "yeah, well, that's also true for other companies!!!" ????? In what world is this a clapback? Is this something you knew before posting? If so, why would you say it knowing it would be disingenuous, if not, why would you not know something so basic? Lol>>62483679You are literally wrong. See first part of above post. This is INSANE cope and head canon.
>>62483748>You made the claim about their sales being significant.Ripple dumps about $2-3 billion per year, and they admit this is the majority of their revenue.If you don't think that's "significant" then that's a you problem.
>>62483760Again, they sell to insitutional clients exclusively in service of their product. I didn't say it wasn't significant to their revenue, I literally said it helps fund our by far largest and most effectual corporate advocate who also incubates ecosystem initiatives and ledger amendments, including the pending lending protocol. Why do you keep trying to skirt claims and equivocate to save face in a disingenuous way?
>>62483748>But Ripple specifically in the ways described have shown how aligned token holder interest is with shareholder interestAs a crypto investor, a project having both shareholders and token holders is objectively a worse deal than only having token holders. You can cope and theorize all you want, this fact remains true. >because the token catalyzes their core business.Yes, by providing free a steady flow of cash each month, which allows them to keep the lights on and pay for the development of the products they are selling. Subsequently, all profit generated by the stuff they built with your money disappears into the same black hole. Amazing deal you've got yourself there, cripplet.
>>62483209Didn't read faggot. take your meds
>>62484451>they sell to insitutional clients exclusivelyThey haven't sold XRP to institutional clients since the lawsuit in 2020.They've sold plenty of Ripple shares to institutions though.
>>6248445138 posts hahahahahah Fucking LOSER.
>>62484480Lol No. They have sold exclusively to institutional clients since 2020. They literally ceased retail sales at the beginning of the suit and shifted to blind auctions to institutional clients.>>62484454Guess what every company has (including Chainlink (shareholders))! If this is some kind of revelation to you you should unironically not be investing.>catalyzesNo, by literally increasing the efficiency of its products through virtue of it vs other issued assets, which is why it autobridges using it. It is the most efficient and only neutral asset which is the whole base case for liquifying cross-assets and networks. Guess what CLL doesn't have! Any reason for the link token to gain value or any value conferred by way of actual technical efficiencies granted by virtue of it being used! Guess what it does have exclusively and only..paypig selling directly to retail to fund corporate operations! Unbelievably weird attempt to "no u!" project and cope here.
>>62484484>0 arguments. >Desperate to pile on rhetoric to make social arguments to avoid real ones.>Gay.
>>62484675Every single XRP they would've sold to institutional clients since then would have been public record. And there are none in that public record.
>>62484681You post the same pictures and same arguments every time. You accuse everyone else of "cope" while constantly moving the goalposts from XRP, to XRPL, to Ripple, to Ripple subsidiaries, depending on what's convenient. Youre an actual fucking loser.
>>62483181>XRP investors
>>62484718What? Lol Literally the opposite is true. They literally published quarterly reports of their ODL sales. Ripple are a private company are are under no such reporting standard to publish sales data, but we have its recent history as a result of the suit. Since the lawsuit they have sold exclusively to institutional partners and offshore accredited investors.
>>62484786Because LITERALLY no one has a response to them. I literally never move the goalposts once and replied directly in thread to every single claim as it was made by the person, clarifying the one time we misunderstood each other and going on to prove the claim was still true for other big banks. Ripple acquired companies ARE Ripple. The faggot I argued against (you) did exactly what you accused me of and then accused me of it and here you are doing it again. You pivoted on EVERY SINGLE claim and refused to admit when proven wrong. When I posted a quote from a city exec on their partnership with Ripple you very fine people clipped it in real time. Over and over same shit. Ironic hypocritical projecting over and over on and on the carousel goes. Exceptionally demoralized person.
>>62483181XRP will finally pump once the anglosphere has digital id. Before then it's all meme dates the link/XRP fud shills make up.
>>62483305i laughed when i read these tweets in the video because DTCC is not even using XRP
LolDTCC says XRP is worthless and Ripplies celebratehttps://vxtwitter.com/Archie_XRPL/status/2077418374313787788
>>62486149>What?Since the lawsuit, every direct sale of XRP by Ripple themselves is a security, meaning they need to fulfill a very specific formality called a "notice of exempt offering of securities"; form D, rule 506(b).Since they haven't done this for XRP since the lawsuit, that means Ripple has not directly sold any XRP to anyone, including institutions.>inb4 muh waiverThe waiver is what allows Ripple to use this exemption form already, without having to wait a few years after the ruling.The waiver changes nothing about the core ruling.
>>62487250Lol No it doesn't and you know it. I literally taught you this after you deliberately misrepresented it for dozens of threads straight months ago. Read the first page in the link in >>61974096. The SEC specifically mention what you are misrepresenting. You have ZERO argument so you do this in EVERY thread like a HUGE faggot. When the case finalized the injunction remained in place. When the SEC and Ripple both appealed the case, after Trump won, they reached a settlement and requested the courts to honor it. The judge did not want to toss her ruling (which injunction aside was a massive win for Ripple, them having literally said they would settle and pay at the earliest point if they got XRP declared a non-security with the Gensler Ethgate SEC denying them and then attaching both Brad and Chris as parties to the suit PERSONALLY, and them hanging on anyways at insane personal risk and spending $150M litigating it and ending up with secondary sales as non-securities and XRP as a non-security and the literal only loss being that a certain subset of specific past sales were declared offerings based on how they marketed the sales, even with the injunction them being able to sell under different offering structures) which was fine, the SEC just granted the waiver instead which accomplished the same thing. The SEC even offered in the settlement to split the fine in half for the past sales that have zero relevance to future or general sales or Ripple's abillity to sell as part of the settlement. Stop being a disingenuous faggot and COPE.
>>62486535DTCC is for XRP you dumb fuck
>>62487305Here's the entire SEC waiver.>"the Final Judgment’s injunction against Ripple remains in effect"This "final judgment" holds that all direct (institutional) sales of XRP by Ripple are securities.>"and, absent a waiver of disqualification, the Regulation D exemptions under Rule 506 of the Securities Act are unavailable to Ripple."This means Ripple needs a "waiver of disqualification" to use "Regulation D exemptions" which would allow them to sell securities.>"the Commission has determined pursuant to Rule 506(d)(2)(ii) of the Securities Act that good cause exists for not denying the exemption contained therein"This means the SEC grants Ripple said waiver.Ergo: Ripple can sell XRP directly (to institutions) if they file for a Regulation D exemption.These exemption filings are public record, and Ripple has not filed any for XRP.QED
>>62487305>>62487360And I also think I know why they haven't filed for such an exemption.Pic related; can you figure it out?
>>62486554isn't that picture entirely AI generated? are these people really that gullible?
