Is it still the ticket?
>>62487252Sure just buy and hold for 10 more years.
Hope so
>>62487252Probably?
>>62487252Ticket to hell and eternal doom? Yes
>>62487252yes sirs, please buy the token and hold. Do not ask questions or Sanjay gets angry. Just believe
>>62487252to the poor house
it was one ticket of many during defi summer. it hasn't been a ticket since
>>62487252ta anon here. This is an altcoins vs Link chartUp = bad, Down = good. Evident by the recent pump in Link. Based on this chart I would not buy Link for long term holding because there's way more room to go up than there is to go down. There is a chance for a major dip here which would be good for Link. If Link does have a major pump soon I would highly recommend to take profits and wait for this chart to go way up before buying Link again
>>62490317it may not look so bad but let's see how this chart looks when not in log scale...yeah I would not be parking my money here
>>62490317>>62490332This is assuming link exists in a legitimate market based upon fundamentals and 99% of alts created in the past 5 years aren't scam pump and dumps destined to go to 0.
>>62490374I evaluate every altcoin this way because I only want to hold an alt that's doing better than other alts, otherwise I'd just hold those other alts or btc. Link's 5 years of down has actually been 5 years of sideways vs other alts. It hasn't actually gone down yet which is up on these charts.
>>62490317>>62490332excellent fud, soldierlinkies are BEYOND retarded
>checks price>$8.44no
>>62490390That's kind of the whole point though, it's a pretty useless metric because it only matters if there is a healthy altcoin ecosystem in crypto, there isn't. It's just been naked scams out in the open since 2021. In 2017 you at least had projects (not even just link) that at least put up a pretense of doing something besides literal pump and dump. At this point though the casino is tapped out and all the speculators have moved onto prediction markets and AI, so the only thing left is genuine fundamentals/adoption. That's why shitcoiners seethe and hate link so much, because it's signalling the end of the crypto casino in a way (not like they haven't killed the golden goose already anyways).
>>62487252>>62489971but every defi project needs to use Chainlinkand institutions are using Chainlink too
>>62496194oh then it must be $10 by now, minimum right?
>>62496196The number is going up quickly
>>62496212you stinkies sure have a funny definition of "up" and "quickly" xD
>>62490374>This is assuming link exists in a legitimate market based upon fundamentals and 99% of alts created in the past 5 years aren't scam pump and dumps destined to go to 0.So LINK is simultaneously being manipulated via Bitcoin and at the same time not subjected to the fundamentals that other altcoins are anchored to. K.
biggest reason to avoid link is to see who holds it. conspiracy theory nutjobs, sunk cost fallacy victims, plain faulty logic users. just look at this thread, the link defense force is out again, do you want to end up like them?
Insider here.Soldiers are about to be rewarded. Big news this month. If you held, you won. Congratulations.
>>62496529I'm so tired.
