Alright linkies. I finally bought after careful due diligence. It may not be much but I hope for generational wealth for myself and for all of you linkies. My linkies stay stinkie 1K EOY.
fuck stink
You’re going to upset a lot of trannies with this one.
>>62516269How does 33.33 thousand dollars sound in 2033?
>>62516269Your dust won't make it. A make it stack is 100k link, 10k for a suicide stack. You'll be committing suicide if it actually moon's when all you can afford from the singularity gains is a used car
>>62516300why are you so concerned about OP making it?
>>62516300make it stack is 1million link, so that when it drops to $4 you'll still have 4m left
>>62516269>Careful due diligenceThere is not a single proposition for the token to increase in value as a result of Chainlink Labs company success.
>>62516269I bought more at $7I'm usually good at buying the bottom but bad at selling the top
>>62516482You're thinking of xrp anonLinks tokenomics have been explained to death and are directly linked to service usage and staking
>>62516269>33 stinksVery nice, I guarantee you'll be locked in for $33 in total value by EOY of 2030
>>62516486No they aren't. The current token value is dramatically over-priced already and the network is unable to support 1/3 of itself through revenues. The token has no utility and was arbitrarily minted on a slow and expensive chain and is not referenced in almost any of Chainlink's services. There is zero demand story for the actual token and Sir Gay while CCIP makes less in revenues than a vending machine in a random small major city (not an exaggeration). Reserve, a flop.Ccip revenue a flopPAL a flopBuild rewards a flopAMA a flop which disallowed any comment on other priorly mentioned flops and was literally just a seminar to linkies on how to market the grift/ponzi to othersLink staking 2.0 a flop
>>62516269How does $2,699,730 sound?
>>62516633Thank you for the digits. WAGMI.
