File: IMG_7186.jpg (81 KB, 670x900)

81 KB JPG

XRP built in DEX edition, no but Mexican exchange necessary, let’s fucking goooooooo

>>62527074
>>62527087

Just let it die

File: IMG_7257.gif (22 KB, 220x230)

22 KB GIF

>>62527102

>>62527074
Guys are we cooked?
Should I sell at a 60% loss just to salvage?

>>62527339
Beat it with your FUD, negative nancy. You prolly hold Link and BTC. Haters gonna hate. We will moon in two weeks (589k)

>>62527339
I did answer your question and gave its important context. Lol XRP default auto-bridges assets and the more assets and liquidity that enter the ledger, the more it fills this role and the higher the demand structure for liquidity providers and market-makers across relevant corridors and products both exclusively on ledger and using the ledger as an intermediary. In the case of Ripple, their entire business is about scaling XRPL use through treasury payments, settlement at their broker dealer (each business settles trillions of dollars annually), international payments, bringing collateral and lending onchain (RLUSD, lending protocol, etc.) etc. Chainlink Labs just arbitrarily minted a random token with zero utility and then flooded the press release zone with announcements that have nothing to do with it to continue to sell it directly to retail, abandoning any real even pretense of building out utility for it in any project across several years (which is why early biz sold) increasingly sunsetting the primacy of the coin in the contracting of their services. The network cannot justify 1/3 of itself in revenues and is already dramatically over-valued. XRP increases the efficiency of all of Ripple's core services which have added frictions not using and incentivizes its use natively through actual value instead of just random rent seeking parasitism, and also incentivizes users to buildout utility for it, like Franklin Templeton (trillion dollar asset manager) and DBS (largest bank in Singapore, the Switzerland of Asia) are doing building out a repo market on the XRPL, or Dubai are doing tokenizing real estate on the XPRL with their royalty partnering with SBI through VivoPower to drive utility or SBI are alone doing to incentivize depositors to hold. The entire model builds around the tech because it is useful and incentivizes driving its use and seeking new use cases. link is literally just a jewish rent seeking coin w/ zero utility.

>>62527407
Terminally butthurt perma-crying soul-cucked linkie copypaster has entered the thread. Not even a bad thing to share in thread. Lol

>>62527397
XRP is my biggest holding, followed by HBAR and XLM
I have shitcoins that did worse (down 95%) but everything is very down. I should have never listened to the faggots /here/ and there last year who convinced me to buy.

I can at least use the losses to offset my income a little bit.

>>62527513
Literally how is it possible you are down on you XRP average? Did you buy late as fuck? We literally all average under .50. You could have bought for cents for YEARS.

File: XRP in Coma.png (756 KB, 1200x800)

756 KB PNG

>>62527339
Wait until September 11th, 2026.
If we haven't mooned by then, then the riddlers are liars, and you can ignore all future moon dates related to them, phases of the moon, solar eclipses, national holidays relating to David Schwartz's tweets, etc.
At that point, we'll only have widespread institutional adoption left as the only thing that can cause XRP to moon.
And there are no real moon dates for when that happens.

A few bagholders have deluded themselves into thinking XRP will moon once the Clarity Act passes.
The institutions, money managers, banks, governments, and businesses that could really cause XRP to moon, are fucking chickenshit cowards,
that need everything to be tied in a neat little perfect bow, legally speaking, before they'll even dip a tiny toe into XRP.
Then we have to wait for years of them testing the waters, before they feel safe.

First it was the SEC lawsuit.
Then it was all of the appeals ending.
Then it was ISO20022 going live.
Then it was the Genius Act (stablecoin regulations).
Now it's the Clarity Act.
Like imagine dating a woman for over 10 years, and she hasn't even let you kiss her.
And she keeps feeding you one excuse after another, on how she's not ready yet.

2030 is probably the real moon date.
That's when the World Economic Forum is planning on enslaving the world by that date.
And they'll need XRP and the XRPL as part of their plans.
But plans can get delayed, due to incompetence, greed, or unexpected developments.
So that 2030 date could get pushed back further.
Basically, if nothing happens and we make it to September 11th, 2026,
then just assume that you're going to be waiting until sometime in 2030, at the earliest.
If 2030 is too far away, then sell on September 11th of this year.

File: XRP struggling to stand d(...).png (682 KB, 743x661)

682 KB PNG

There are some anons in here, that literally nothing can stop them from bagholding.
We could be eating bugs, on universal basic income, and have social credit scores.
And they would be like, "See, the fact that we're not allowed to spend our CBDCs on XRP, means it's because it's going to moon soon!"
They could be in jail for wrongthink, or being lined up against the wall to be shot, and they'd still be excited and hopeful for the future.
Optimism completely disconnected from what happens in real life.
As things continue to get worse, expect to see more and more anons posting about XRP mooning in their dreams.

>>62527436
Literally no one is emotional about any of this except you and the depth of pissiness is legitimately bottomless. The meme doesn't even mock me, it just unknowingly enshrines one instance of weird abstracting process of cope in a long line of instances in an ironically pretty cool aesthetic way. It is the meme equivalent of someone who is skilled making a cool "Trump said very fine people" meme. Lol

>>62527527
I didn't even get into crypto until last year when Trump got back in
Didn't think $2-3 would matter when I thought it'd go higher, but now it seems like crypto in general is done t b h

>>62527570
Pretty funny one to have copied from me. Must have made you mad in thread (https://warosu.org/biz/thread/62522270#p62523190) to save it for later. Lmao
Most importantly though, see:
>>62527436

>>62527590
>t. literal retard
we're at the bottom, bros

>>62527528
>September 11th, 2026
Is something happening this day? Or is this purely from the schizo numerology angle?

I don't think Clarity will happen at all. What then?

>>62527590
In the long run you will still be glad you bought and you will likely (imo) get a last time to buy a marketwide crash if you aren't a demoralized NPC about it when opportunity happens. Why did you wait so long to buy any? Kind of an insane moment in the evolution of finance to not have seen at any point until very recently. The entire global economy and capital markets are tokenizing and pushing for the signing of market structure, a market that doesn't even exist yet with financial institutions and banks adopting new standards which allow its use once legal, the BIS is setting standards to hold it with many policy setting member banks already doing so and you are selling now because you got rekt on memes and see pre-utility speculation dwindling as macro/geopolitical conditions crater and liquidity is drying up and you are assigning this to crypto uniquely? Lol Let me guess, you want to buy AI and Nvidia? You lucked into discovering XRP at all. You would be better off passively investing into crypto through your retirement account once it default includes it and you get an uplift from it but miss the real opportunity. I wish you luck and disregard everything I said if you are young but holy shit are you ignorant to what is happening if you think crypto is dead (price as said likely will be brutal in a cross-market crash in the future though, which I am hoping for one last time to buy again).

File: IMG_7258.jpg (288 KB, 854x1785)

288 KB JPG

One of my favorite stories growing up was Jack and the beanstalk. Never forget brothers, fortune favors the bold.

>>62527539
>>62527528
Nothing you've written is meaningful. XRP is the technology that disintermediates the globalist parasite and scales us on rails that are not constrainable (all forks, federated side chains, etc.) on a centralized L2 business technology control grid hell money. You are posting terrible boomer style indian hand made memes. None of us are signing deals with the devil to make it on this. XRP frees mankind from an extreme level of systems dominance that scaling into shitty Eth or BTC L2s would have made inescapable in a usable system.

>>62527614
Purely schizo.
As I've said in previous threads, it's the last day of the year 2018, on the Ethiopian calendar.
BearableGuy123, the original riddler, said XRP would be $589 end of year 2018.
Every other calendar in the world, is past 2018.
The Ethiopian one is the only one left.
Basically, I'm grasping at straws here.
It's less of a meme date, and more of a last chance for riddlers to be right, by date.

2030 is probably the real year.
Even after Clarity passes, it takes 1 year for some of its laws to go into effect.
There's always some new extra step that is needed in order to wine and dine the institutions that will use XRP.
It's never enough.
Always some extra step.
Always 2 more weeks.
When it's really 2 more years, 4 more years, 10 more years, etc.
Whoops, you died of old age.
But infinite stoicim, delusional, hopeful anons don't want to hear any of that.
Just endless hope hooked up directly into their veins.
Just remain in a constant state of excitement year after year.
Or just keep putting more and more money into XRP year and year.
Never question its shit price performance.
Just have infinite faith until you die or XRP moons; whichever comes first.
It's not your place to question, just obey. /sarcasm

>>62527646

Well said. The alternative chains are straight up shit.

>>62527646
I made both of those memes in Gimp.
Don't you find it weird that Ripple is in charge of the escrow for XRP?
The company that is helping countries develop CBDCs on the XRP ledger,
and hosted this year's World Economic Forum, and have attended multiple years.
Why would a tool that is going to take away power from the globalists, have a company working with the globalists control the escrow?
Is Ripple dumb?
Is the World Economic Forum dumb?

>>62527622
To be honest I was kind of scared of crypto because
>Scammy asset class
>Super risky asset class
>Literally no protections
>Getting it set up seemed complicated
>I already missed the big run-up, so now it's just high risk with mediocre reward

I heard a little here and there about it being the "future of finance" but I always thought it was bullshit. And I mean fwiw at this point it still is bullshit.
But I thought Trump would change that, because you can always count on that fuck yo enrich himself and his family. Unfortunately they did do in a way that not only didn't pump crypto but effectively killed the crypto market.

I hope it does pay off someday. I'll probably always hold some XRP just for that slim possibility that it actually does moon. But I'm not holding my breath and cash or PMs are looking more and more tantalizing at this point.

File: IMG_7239.jpg (159 KB, 1206x1174)

159 KB JPG

>>62527683
It’s a Trojan horse they have no choice but to accept. Remember what Bernanke said (paraphrasing) “governments will roll tanks out on the streets before giving up control of the money supply”
They will still have their control…but so will the people…it’s the only way forward

>>62527686
The global capital markets are tokenizing and taking public stances for clarity. You are conflating a really broad set of stuff to be all inclusive one thing. It would be like calling all internet companies in 2000 a scam because there was a lot of retarded retail chasing VC pumped vaporware. I hope you don't take this personally but you are nowhere near knowledgeable about the space enough to say it is not the future rails of finance. Current financial messaging happens on fax machine era technology. Settlement to different places can take longer and be more expensive than flying the same amount of money to the place on an airplane with multiple layovers. I say this as someone who is also up multiples on my PM position. You are literally thinking that the internet will not be anything and will die with Dotcom because your friends who got you into meme coins stopped buying WorldCom. The world is not going to scale onto DOGE or pictures of cartoon apes. It is absolutely going to scale into blockchain/DLT in general across multiple networks as a real utility. We don't even have the legal capacity to have a real utility based market yet. The CEA doesn't qualify its collateral usage yet. Bessent says the country which controls the regulatory structure of digital assets will control the next century of finance. Stablecoins and crypto stand to increase velocity, unlock trillions in idle and slow capital to yield bearing assets and pump literally trillions into the treasury market exactly as global liquidity is tightening and the US is facing a debt finance wall. You need to stop presuming to understand things you just started paying attention to and learn more about finance in general. Eurodollar University is a good place to start.Start with the first episode and watch through the 50 or so following it.

>>62527686
>>62527747
Some good recommendations for a good introduction from varied econ/finance people with very differing opinions and specialties to check out:
Hedgeye with Keith Mccullough, Danielle Dimartino Booth, Lacy Hunt, Jeffrey Gundlach, Mark Cabana, Zoltan Pozsar, Mike Green, Michael Every, Dave Collum, Russell Napier, Brent Johnson, Melody Wright, Vince Lanci.

Jamie Dimon even says global finance is scaling onto blockchain. They just settled the first internationally settled onchain treasury partnering with Ripple and ONDO and Mastercard a month or so ago. Larry Fink says everything which can be tokenized will. Ripple partnered with ONDO for XRPL inclusion, which is a coalition including Black Rock, Wisdom Tree, Franklin Templeton, Van Eck, etc. These are not people or institutions I admire but they are people at the absolute vanguard of global finance newly making claims while the infrastructure is building out, thankfully in a good way rather than a silo'd way (analogized in AI (which is a slightly bad analogy because I oppose it in any structure and think it is a hell technology) by open models breaking the closed IP rape model after Mark Andreeson said that Biden told Silicon Valley not to even try to make AI companies because it was going to be just one or two selected companies given the whole).

>>62527747
>Bessent says the country which controls the regulatory structure of digital assets will control the next century of finance.
They've said this shit nonstop for the past 2 years yet here we are a few months away from elections and the Clarity Act isn't even on the fucking calendar. They won't even debate it. The side that hates orange man will win majority and they will adamantly oppose anything vaguely related to orange man (which unfortunately includes crypto) even at the expense of the country.
So that basically shuts Clarity out until 2028 or 2030. It looks like it'll be grim for years before there's any vague chance of what you're saying to earnestly start shaping up. And at the moment none of these huge acquisitions, partnerships, trials, not even the court case, does a damn thing for price action. When individual cryptos actually start moving on their own I'll take it more seriously, but at the moment the entire asset class just moves in lockstep and is affected by market macros more than anything else.

I appreciate the detailed responses and I'll check out some of those channels. I've watched a lot in the past year or two and I know more than I let on, but I've just gotten so blackpilled at this point that the asset class is a giant rugpull and that, even if it is the future of finance or whatever, stablecoins will reign supreme.

On that note could you (or another) clarify the argument for XRP if they can just use RLUSD to move money quickly and cheaply? Is it because XRP isnt pegged to the dollar?

>>62527887
Most of them are not channels properly but are just people who have many interviews/published notes etc. you can watch and read. Eurodollar University will not tell you how you should invest but it will help you understand macro/plumbing. Okay fair enough. I disagree on the road to clarity, but you are at least more aware of the shape of things in the abstract than I thought you were. I disagree and believe it will be passed and I believe it is tabled for early August. But the thing is even if clarity does not pass, crypto still scales it will just go offshore. The people who "control the next 100 years of finance" will just be other people and the technology will still transform services and institutional use. RLUSD is a MASSIVE value add to the XRP thesis. The entire thesis has always been that there will be silo'd walled gardens of liquidity that are not connect, both onchain and not. RLUSD is just on issued asset which does this in a massively accomplished regulatory way with NYDFS approval, which is already integrating into institutional workflows for treasury management, post-trade settlement at a broker dealer, in payments etc. It is also a stave to brings dollar liquidity onchain in a highly institution forward way which Ripple may be able to even park at the Fed if they get their master account, and its multi-network aspect helps port liquidity from other networks to XRPL, as has happened with a majority of RLUSD being issued on the XRPL now after issuing mostly originally on ETH, and forms an onchain took for dollar specific flows to not need to exit to execute. There will need to be and will be hundreds of other differently and same denominated stablecoins for different uses and market/location/regulatory regime specific purposes etc. in addition to other tokenized assets (traditional stablecoins are really tokenized fiat) like stocks, bonds, hard assets, etc. XRP auto-bridges all of them and is the only asset capable of this level of universal

File: IMG_7236.jpg (102 KB, 720x900)

102 KB JPG

>>62527887
Rlusd is a website, xrp is the internet

“Can’t stop the signal, mal”

>>62527887
>>62527938
cross-asset liquidity. It does not force anyone to assume the asset or counterparty risk or compliance bog (despite the fact compliance features are engrained and universal at the protocol level for issued assets) etc. to exchange other assets and defaults to using the most efficient path, which using XRP is counterparty-less which (along with using XRP as collateral in the future when the CEA is amended) will free up locked collateral for yield and further use. XRP is the basis for ODL and does not require any country or company to trust any other with zero clawback features. It is a neutral public utility maintained by a consensus that does not reward operators or give preference to large holders. RLUSD does not challenge the XRP use case and expands it in many dimensions and builds off what was originally stated as the XRPL base payments case a by David Schwartz a long time ago.

>>62527952
This. RLUSD is Google. XRP is TCP/IP for the value layer of the internet.

>>62527938
>>62527887
Also should note that I don't think the first Eurodollar University episodes are findable on the current channel but all are on Emil's channel which they were originally posted on. They originally made the channel because legitimately no one knew this stuff at the time and most still don't. It is an excellent class on stuff from two likable guys (Emil left later on in it after it was all covered and basically became just covering the news). Here is the first episode:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FowTWPULixU
Emil also does great work on describing the Silent Depression we have been in since 2007 which builds on the back of their work of the eurodollar #n events and never gets the flowers he deserves from anyone but Jeff:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dcl1RP1ziNo
Jeff hired someone to do his graphics which made the new channel's clickbaity (which has seemed to really improve his reach) but he is literally probably the most knowledgeable person who doesn't work directly in banking or regulation with open access to the ledgers on how money works and the state of it. Hope you find this informative and worthwhile! I don't really watch anymore except occasionally but it taught me a LOT, more than any course or channel I have ever taken or watched by far. Just watch the first 50 or so and you will be amazed what you learn. Usually there is also a published piece that gets deeper into the episode subject which is worthwhile too but not necessary.