Serious questionWhen will it pump?
>>62557369when staking is active on every node for every service>finite tokens>infinite use cases >18 decimal places
>>62557375This is the correct but unsatisfying answer.The next questions are>When live services?>When full staking?And the answer is fuck you
Just 9 more years
>>625573693-5 years
>>62557400ago
>>62557401kek
>>62557375Be careful bro, you don't want to be labeled a peeling fuddie gooner when you say things like this
>>62557401well played. but the truth doesn't change: whoever buys today (most likely) will be filthy rich (someday).
>>62557423I need it to hit 20 dollars before next year
>>62557433wish you luck
>>62557433lol
>>62557369Clarity act passing and the mass tokenization of every asset begins
>>62557664Only if staking is also active. If it is a demo run of tokenized assets with no collateralization from nodes, there won't be a token demand increase (although speculation might move the price a bit).
>>62557664even if the clarity act passes and mass tokenization of every asset goes in full global instant production frenzy and Larry Fink himself says live on tv I THINK CHAINLINK IS VERY COOL AND THE CHAINLINK TOKEN (TICKER: LINK) IS VERY MUCH NEEDED the price of LINK would still somehow just crabdump -2% .
>>62557664>clarityAll but confirmed not happening. 4 days left to put it on the floor with congress leaving for summer recess on Friday. You're gonna have to hold those bags for just a little longer
>>62557393"Full staking" is here
>>62557968Staking IS already here Whats the obsession with "wen staking"It's done, finished, there's no "full staking" there's no "bigger pool"
>>62557369tokens that are real products and services like Chainlink are getting institutional adoption and regulatory support now
>>62557433$5 dollars EOY 2027, that's the best I can do
>>62557375on the other hand, you can use the smallest fraction of link to fulfill transferandcall requirements for tx of any value. the token does not have to be worth anything in order to do this, and the contract payees do not have to pay nodes with chainlink.
>>62557369In two weeks, unironically.
>>62557369The financial system can’t change until the elite are comfortable to move onAnd they’re only comfortable after the population reduction event
>>62558418I'm so tired.
Bump
>>62558208I meant full collateralization. That's when LINK demand will soar.
>>62558208Link marines don't even understand the tech as much as the fudders lol"Full staking" means you can become a decentralized node operator if you possess enough token as collateral. CLL has gaslighted you into thinking that staking means locking up your tokens with them while they give you dividends. Basically, what every other shitcoin does. Meanwhile, the chainlink network is still entirely centralized and eventually the link token will be worthless when CLL runs out of tokens to dump and they IPO.
