Good news for CCIP: it now bridges 70% of all wrapped Bitcoin, a sign that the crypto industry is finally growing up and putting security first.Shame the daily revenue is still below what you'd expect from a lemonade stand, and the token remains completely unnecessary though.
>>62563094Bro. Broooooooooooo, WHAT TIME IS IT? It's.....PARTNERSHIP TIIIIIIIIIIME
I bet the price and chart must look nice with all this adoption. The CCIP revenue must be huge.
>>62563094>he token remains completely unnecessaryCCIP doesn't do anything without nodes being paid in Link.>>62564649The CCIP revenue tracker is a third-party app. It's almost certainly wildly inaccurate, just like all attempts at tracking onchain Chainlink revenues have been
>>62564723>almost certainlyBased on what do you make this claim?>tracking onchain ChainlinkNot looking great for the dont trust, verify crowd. So either they dont have any revenue and live off token salesor they have massive revenue and nothing is flowing to token holders after all the subsidies.
>>62563094who fucking cares
>>62564649Shut the fuck up dude
>>62564649Quit being an asshole
>>62564819>Based on what do you make this claim?It's in the very next line.>Not looking great for the dont trust, verify crowd.So sell
>>62564834>>62564850No you shut up paypiggies, look at the chart and buy some more, its a great buying opportunity. They will dilute the supply for another 4 years and the moment you mention this , retards like you all start arguing semantics how you are not being shafted. >>62564851>It's in the very next line.Ah yes, its not correct because its not accurateand its not accurate because why? Its either not there ORThey dont want you to know the real numbers.>So sellThats what CLL is doing indeed.
>>62564892>and its not accurate because why?Because there have been many attempts at tracking onchain CL node revenues, and none of them have ever been successful.See Dune, Eric Wallach, Linkpool, etc.>Thats what CLL is doing indeed.Great, one more reason for you to sell as well.Kinda weird you're still even here.
>>62563094K E YEK
>>62564964>and its not accurate because why?>Because there have been many attempts at tracking onchain CL node revenues,Why have so many failed? Because its not accurate. Why is it not accurate? Because many failed.Nice dancing around paypig.Its either not there ORThey dont want you to know the real numbers.The token can be 1 dollar or 1 cent. the node operators get paid in x dollar, paid in x link worth x dollar, sell link for said dollar.
>>62565025All previous attempts have failed to accurately track revenue.The current attempt is hilariously out of whack with actual adoption ($14 billion switched from Layerzero to CCIP in just the past weeks, for example).Occam's razor says the current attempt at tracking revenue is failing.>paypigI'm talking about an investment I made.You're here getting angry about other people's investments.Occam's razor says you're the one getting paid to be here.
>>62565052Occams razor, the simplest explanation. The real numbers are higher, 0 of that flows into the funding token. >>62565052>Occam's razor says you're the one getting paid to be here.This applies to you too. You get dragged in like a fly to a turd to defend CLL. You dont hold the token, you just shill the token for money.
>>62565052Every other Defi product that generates revenue, some dwarfing Chainlink's both in size and complexity, has no issue with these metrics. Why can't you answer *why* instead of repeating that it's repeatedly failed?
>>62565082>talking about your investment is the same as talking about other people's investmentsit really really is not.You're obviously doing this out of financial interest.>>62565478The numbers don't change even though massive users keep getting added.So either all those new CCIP users are lying (including Kraken, Lombard, Bitgo etc.), or a third party is once again failing to track revenue (see literally all past attempts).The inference writes itself.
>>62565917>circles around the point again and starts questioning the motive behind the questions>knows enough about the project to defend it ad infinitum in multiple threads, suddenly knows nothing when asked about visualising revenue flowsYou are on the payrollYou dont own the token, you shill it for shekels
>>62564723>>>he token remains completely unnecessary>CCIP doesn't do anything without nodes being paid in Link.Not paid in Link from the market. CLL's coffers manage just fine while the link tokens sit on exchanges to collect digital dust. > token purchase not needed
>>62563094wrapped bitcoin? PFFFTTTTTTTT WRAPPED BITCOIN???????????????LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
>>62568544>1pbtid>>62568579>1pbtidpaid fuddie switching IDs
>>62563094Quite a lot of money for a lemonade stand if we're being serious
Stealth peeler thread
>>62563094But, is this good news for the price?
>>62563094Can I please be rich now Sergey? I have been such a good boy...
>>62568789The crypto market says no.But then again, the crypto market pumped BNB to an absolute ATH just two days after Binance crashed the entire crypto market.>>62568795>FOUNDER SAAAR YOU MAAAAST TO PAMP YOUR COIN SAAR
>>62568811>FOUNDER SAAAR YOU MAAAAST TO PAMP YOUR COIN SAARyou forgot the gigachad image
>>62568839here you go
>>62568869village isn't going to feed itself sir
>>62564892>look at the chart and buy some more, its a great buying opportunity.I literally am, every month. Fuckface
>>62568595I moved location, like going outside, you should try it.Its also not an argument.>>62568879Good paypiggieboy Bold and brave
>>62568894>Its also not an argument.you wanna have arguments on 4chan? About other people's investments?Every day for years and years and years?fuck off paid fuddie
I just sold and I'm willing to share my transaction info for anyone interested
>>62563094chainlink becoming a bridge is such a cop out ngl. like oh wow its ren 2.0
>>62568595>paid fuddie switching IDsnot at all nor does it invalidate my point
>>62572813First off: most CCIP payments are direct: https://docs.chain.link/ccip/billingIf alternative payments are made, they are converted on the open market (Uniswap iirc) for a premium (see image)If after all that there are still cases of CCIP usage where Link tokens are taken from Chainlink's premine, then that's because they said they would do this back in 2017, and inflationary rewards are inherently part of crypto.
>>62565052>Occam's razor says you're the one getting paid to be here.Nigger's razor says nobody gives two steaming shits about this dead board averaging 2,5 posts a minute.Get a grip.
>>62572842Probably a dumb question but if all these nodes are getting paid directly and are being subsidized by retarded LINK buyers, then why isn't anyone here making money running a node? Chainlink is decentralized right? Surely someone is doing this here if that is the case?
>>62573285Exactly, so why keep fudding and getting angry at other people's investments?>>62573342>being subsidized by retarded LINK buyerswait till you find out how much of Bitcoin miner rewards is made up of subsidies.
>>62563094Wrapped btc in old loser tech. CKbtc mogs
