>”Buy SPCX. $135 is the absolute floor. It will be at $260 within 12 months. You will hate yourself if you don't get in now”A thread dedicated to the Eternal Musk bagholders who fell for the biggest PsyOp in human history. MuskRATS believed a snake oil salesman could colonize Mars and mine Asteroids. lol lmao
you are such a fucking loser lol. when it's at $200 in December you'll be the one crying
>>62564524I mean honestly it'll probably go gangbusters eventually. It's the same as Facebook right after the IPO.
The fact this piece of shit was promoted on every mainstream outlet was a huge red flag.Yeah, sure, the elites want *you* to become rich, bro!
>>62564588> silly baggycheckered and kekered
>>62564618I instantly got a revo alert 1day after ipo kek, shorting it since 123.....
wtf almost bought at 125... and now it's 112 again
Off to a Flyer today then boys?Seems a whole BUNCH of spacebaggies trying to dump metric tons of this shit, all of a sudden. Who'd have guessed.
Market is rigged two strong candles then the market tanks. Is clear sign the market doesnt follow live order flows.
reminder: Facebook was at 50% of its IPO price 4 months after IPO and is now trading at 31x that low
>>62565012Two words for you: Market. Cap. And another two words for good measure>kek baggie
>>62565031spcx's market cap should be 100x meta's
>>62564524>What could go wrong>Lockup unlock dilution>CouldDelulu.
>>62564743Shorting leveraged or straight? How much. Which platform do you recommend?>>62564782Yeah cuz you a retarded nigga who doesn’t know why he does stuff.
>>62565039Why? Explain a actual realistic timeline where they become profitable without muh space datacentres nigga
I get hating Elon for DOGE's failures and I get hating SpaceX for the retarded "orbital datacenter" marketing but all this FUD is going to make me invest at current levels.If 4chan is reaching consensus that SPCX is a bad buy, it probably isn't.
>>62565012Was fb at 4% circulated then?
>>62565106Not much lev, hyperliquid xyz
>>62565129You have 22 hrs to all in!
>>62565129as others have noted, the valuation is ludicrous, when not outright fraud. And every possible justification of same produced to date has been barely coherent inane drivel that falls apart the second you look at it sideways.
>>62565129Screenshot your purchase please.
how bad will the Thursday lockup dump price drop be?
>>62565208> the valuation is ludicrousbecause it's only 1.5 trillionrealistically it should be at least 10-15 trillion
>>62565129There's almost a billion shares about to be sold tomorrow lol
>>62565479Ok this is a satire account...
Thoughts?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c3w-c1pQSRo
>>62565602>I exactly know where the price will go and it'll be $50Doesn't work that way. Stock's bottom can be $80 for all we know.
I have a rule of not buying into companies that are losing lots of money, am I retarded?
VC unlocks starting tomorrow.Start slurping at $80.
>>62566135Vc unlocks kek this clown shit world :D
>>62565012facebook actually makes money tho
Concerning!
>>62566135Why should anyone slurp at $80? There’s tons more vc unlocks coming this year.
>>62565479Considering how the Matrioshka brains and sexy space aliens are just around the corner, it should be worth 150 trillion as the bare minimum
>its pumpinglockupbros? I dont feel so good
>>62570269>pumpinhIt's crabbing. Which is somewhat impressive. Still absolutely a gamble until below $100.
>>62570288>Still absolutely a gamble until below $100still $1.3 trillion of overinflated trash @ $99
>>62570348It's overinflated trash with high demand. TSLA is overinflated trash that should be below $100 and still lives.The market is retarded. It's knowing when to get in. I'm happy to gamble around $80. If it doesn't reach there I have plenty of opportunities in other stocks.
>On Thursday, nearly a billion shares of SpaceX, held by early employees and pre-IPO investors, will finally break free from their lockups. The shares, totaling around $100 billion at current prices, are more of a supply shock than the entire IPO itself. And while analysts worry that it will cheapen the stock—or, as Morgan Stanley suggests, provide an opportunity “to gain exposure to a potential generational compounder”—SpaceX avoided the worst of this moment by quietly lining up its buyers before the lockup clock even started running.>Fortune Article: https://fortune.com/2026/08/05/spacex-lockup-expiration-index-inclusion-bailout-luria/Seems like SpaceX already arranged institutional buyers for the biggest holders who transacted directly rather than dumping onto the open market. Explains the relatively low volume.Still a wait-and-see stock for me. By October, I think almost all shares other than Musk's should be unlocked. Let's see where the price and average volume are by then.
>>62570288>110 -> 114>114 -> 133>its crabbing
>>62574046Congrats you drooling retard, you're replying to a post on Thursday on Friday when literally every stock jumped up.
