how do you explain Business Cycles if you reject the tendancy of the rate of profit to fall, let alone the start of neoliberalism
>>62576271nigger
>>62576278average neoclassicist, in what they are and attitude
>Be 90s/00s brilliant British technocratic chancellor of the exchequer >Confidently claim you will eliminate boom and bust>Humongous bust ends your career
>>62576281i blame neil kinnock more ngl
>Be 90iq American 2020s president >Also claim you will eliminate boom and bust>Somehow pulls it off>By flatlining the economy with perma-stagflation
>>62576321trump is a great hero in a hegelian sense, that he is perfectly embodying the modern age. a figure outside the neolib establishment, destroying the globalist economy swiftly through his attempts save it
>>62576335It will be a cosmic correction
>>62576472agreed comrade
>>62576278>i have no rebuttal
>>62576271>how do you explain Business Cycles if you reject the tendancy of the rate of profit to falli don't, it's a well established fact. gommunism still doesn't work thoughever and no i will not be trying it
>>62577792gommunism shouldnt be attempted, economic dignity and democratisation should. also youd be surprised since both neoclassi-tards and even mmt/neochartialists reject TRPF and rarely or poorly fill the gap
