well, judging from p+c, that ain't happening
What's good for the industry is bad for bitcoin.
>>62580265then explain Bitcoin pumping when Walmart "adopted" LTC, Tesla "adopted" Doge, Blackrock "adopted" Hbar, Ripple "won" the lawsuit, ...
>>62580451there's a weird phenomenon with advocates like yourself who are mentally trapped in prior cycles. you got a bad case of uncle rico syndrome bro. you're sitting here talking about a pump that happened in 2021 and quoting some fluff pump piece from an article written around then... in an industry that moves at lightning speed, might as well have been 50 years ago ive said this more times than i can count on this board, but you can't debate your way into gains. the market is never wrong
>>62580552damn you had all that just ready at the tip of your fingers huh?Here's the only "weird phenomenon" that matters.
>>62580451Bitcoin is an oldest coin that is 1) has been very long on the market2) is beating S&P 500, 3) is deflationary , and4) easy to explain to midwit boomer mutual fund investors who have all the money. >>62580552>there's a weird phenomenon with advocates like yourself who are mentally trapped in prior cycles. Ah, no. it's simpler. Bitcoin got a very easy marketing to boomers and mutual funds. It's easy to market.
>>62580649>2) is beating S&P 500,no it isn't lol
>>62580649You missed the point of my question.Why does Bitcoin pump when most alts get a big win, but always dump when Chainlink specifically gets a big win?
>>62580662I can't post any replies as soon as i mention. b---0----t----s
>>62580622you don't seem to understand my post in your feeble mind, your thinking >duuuuuuude if i can just expose le conspiracy then people will realize nah bro, no one cares. you can argue until you're blue in the face but as i said, you cannot argue your way to good price actionTHE Cuckolds of crypto
>>62580784>nah bro, no one caresyou clearly do though
>>62580865i care enough to say p+cyou care enough to write million word essayswe are not the same
>>62580073Please use the word chainlink so I my filters work, thank you
>>62580876>i care enough to say p+cyeah, in every link thread every day for years>you care enough to write million word essaysfuddies are the ones with the million word essays though
>>62580073Where one hates link, because of the WEF endorsement and its ties to isreal.>>62580176>p+cWhats that?
>>62580904>fuddies are the ones with the million word essays thoughits bots. they crawl this space and look for key works. We tested this out years ago with bait key words.
>>62580073>may>could>possibly>retards believe>trust the incels brono thanks
>>62581828>he doesn't know
>>62581850you don't either it looks like lol
Yep Link makes Central exchanges (And XRP) Obsolete, while bitcoin can't do anything without a middleman (RIP Satohi's Mantra of removing the middle man) and thus keeps CEXs in business. Central exchanges suppress everything that competes with them.
>>62582193that makes a lot of senseRemember the Bitcoin dump in response to the US govt. adoption?
>>62582193>>62584402well apparently some serious Binance shenanigans happened right at that time
>>62580176This is what you do with all of your time. Its pathetic
>>62580073You post this in every fucking day and are. They aren't suppressing the price. There is zero buying volume you fucking retard. link is downstream global liquifity and macro/geopolitical structures impacting its flows. Literally all crypto functions this way and resistance bands for each crypto individually establish in interconnected ways for this reason. You are literally just looking at one of them and being like "see see!!!! Look, mine is special!" and ignoring all the others. You aren't noticing anything anyone is missing, you are REALLY retardedly hyper-fixating on one and missing the cross-market theme and thinking it is longterm edge despite no mechanism for actual price growth or even sustenance being built just...cuz. You are LITERALLY basing ALL of your thinking on the lowest IQ analysis imaginable of watching one coin's chart in ignorance of all the others and getting hyped by announcements that mean nothing to token holders by way of value or revenue which are literally written for (((Sir Gay))) to sell to (You) with a lift in retail buying orders. It is literally that simple. And its equilibrium is sinking down and to the right, still unable to support $30 of network ops with revenues and zero planned or even hypothesized build of implementation to change that. They are not building for you, they are funding their build and salaries and exit through you. Lol Learn literal econ 101
>>62580622see>>62586217One bank putting out a research note written by someone who never inspected the mechanic by which value doesn't confer to token holders based on company product usage is not the foundational validation you think it is when it doesn't change the material reality of the products which his research overlooked. This is actually pretty typical of bank research into crypto. You can find lots of examples over the last decade of really really poorly researched notes, down to the level of them just wholecloth repeating twitter canned phrases with no explanation or citation. It happens all the time.
>>62586217>>62586221mental illness
>>62582193>while bitcoin can't do anything without a middlemanHave you heard about BTCFi and protocols like Babylon that's on it with native staking?
>>62580073maybe, it seems too timely for the selling to only be bitcoin miners
