>mommy, how come linkies are acting like they're about to win big because they went to $8.70 and some dork wrote an article saying maybe just maybe in 4 years they'll be $200?
>>62585538forget $200, someone got dubs saying it'll be $81k in 2030, i trust dubs more
>>62585538I'm suprised their pleasure centers can still fire after being cucked daily for the last 6 years.
>>62585538the only reason link is pumping is because everyone is look for top security now instead of things like speed. Everyone is tired of getting hacked by russia, china and north korea.
>>62585538What part of you'll own nothing and you'll be happy don't you understand?>>62585623This 10000 times. People are sick of losing money from lying ass protocols and hardware devices that claim to be safe. By 2030, everything will be digital, unhackable, and fast.
>>62585631ok but chainlink isn't needed for thatand if it is needed, its token surely is not
>>62585664Yes it is needed. It is used as a punishment factor if validators become naughty. If someone migrates to chainlink, validator must lock up more link to support the in coming capitol. If they decided to fake the data or go offline, a portion of their their staked link get taken and the rest burned.
as
d
>>62585538It's not the article from some random whatever predicting $200, it's actually the increased number of unhinged fud posts lately, it's a better indicator than any twitter posts
