[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


>be me
>spend 2 years casually learning economics and my country's place in the global market, challenges and future
>start watching interviews and podcasts of local economists for two weeks
>realize that I really know nothing about the complex dynamics of our economy, let alone the world's.
>thus, my opinion on economic policy is worth less than an empty bag of chips.
>More so, realize all of my friends' opinions are just noise and not worth listening to
The economy is a really interesting topic to me, because I'm into economic pragmatism: I don't care if an economic policy comes from the right or left, what I care is if it works in practice and helps my country develop further.
How do I truly learn how the economy works, market-bros? Do I have to read some books in particular? Or should I give up?
>>
>>62593319
>empty bag of chips

theyre called crisps. because they are crispy. only gay americans call crisps chips. you dont want to be gay do you
>>
>>62593319
>casually learning economics
what does this mean
you watched some youtube videos from crash course of some shit. or did you actually work through mankiw principles textbooks
>>
>>62593319
I can't tell you much about what approach to economics is the most useful because it is such a homosexual field; a man-made system too complex to be entirely understood by a single human. It's not entirely philosophy in which you get to ask the interesting questions, it's not the sciences that grant you some minuscle glimpses of truth. No, it's fake, gay and despite all the billions of papers and analysis tools, it still seems like a chaotic system
>>62593341
I can't disagree that crisps would make more sense, but the rest of the world calls it chips, nigel.
>>
>>62593369
Basically yes. Also read the news, interviews, podcasts and started reading a book. I think I have some notion of the key distinct features a developed economy has compared to a developing one, but I'm not really sure anymore.
>mankiw principles textbooks
Are they good enough for a casual like me?
>>62593402
>it still seems like a chaotic system
Damn. Still, have economists figured out development economics?
>>
>>62593319
Don't worry Anon, bags of chips are always half-empty anyways.
>>
>>62593319
>>More so, realize all of my friends' opinions are just noise and not worth listening to
There is one and only one thing you need to know about the economy, to know about the economy. The demand-supply curve.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.