>ok fine men can message first that should increase the value of ou-AAAAAAAAAAAAAACK!!!
last time I used a dating app was like 2023 and I pretended to be a buff millionaire from /fit/. I think about the 22yo girl in a bikini on there I saw. I wonder if she was actually a jeet or negro scammer. Anyway she'd be 26 now and too old. I'm also 'too old' or rather I no longer care because I realized I'll never be happy or get to do the things I wanted to do when I was 23. Womp womp nigga. Total Gen Y female death.
>>62595353They're going to have AI matchmakers by Q4 2026. BUY BUY BUY.
>>62595361AI (yet moar! personal data theft) + shekelgrubbing scam trash people are sick of anyway, this is not gonna prove the savior they seek.The apps jewed themselves to death. More nickel and diming and less chance of a Win than Vegas, folks jus' got real tired of their shit.
who the fuck pays for dating apps lol
>>62595353So this is the power of female run companies…
>>62595353Women are an obsolete technology.
>year 1.5 of the pandemic>bored out of my fucking mind>install bumble>set range to 18-55>swipe right on anyone that looks even remotely fuckable>next day check the app>no matches>BUY PREMIUM TO SEE WHO LIKED YOU BRO>it shows a blurred silluethe of jabba the hut>uninstall bumble note that i don't actually have problem meeting irl womeni don't think they thought this particular jewish scheme thru
>>62595353Why would a dating app be a publicly traded company?
>>62599734Cus 'murica
Why won't somebody just make a dating site like how OkCupid was back around 2010 and not sell to the MatchJew?Yeah, they won't get rich, but they should feel good about doing a service to humanity.
>>62599748because browns existand nut jobsand insane womenand etc
>>62599748what was okcupid like back then? what made it better than swiping on ai generated indian bot accounts?
>>62595356Did the buff millionaire larp work
>>62599771No subscription fees.Search function with filters that available to everyone for free.Nice matchmaking algorithm that didn't show you shitters and then tease you with some hotties in an attempt to make you pay.>>62599765Just ignore/block them.
>>62595353The app just made men swipe right on literally all women, and then they'd just ignore messages from the women they didn't find attractive.Rejection is the worst thing imaginable for women, and the retards at Bumble thought it would be a good idea to subject their female userbase to rejection every day, lmao
I've never seen an attractive male use bumble.
>>62599789And it worked greatHot women could pick and choose the studs they want to have sex withChads could just chill and wait for hot chicks to message themThey made the change because fat ugly women didn't like how they weren't getting replies from men and not getting first messaged like they do on other apps. That's it.>>62599795Stick to grindr then?
>>62599803>Hot women could pick and choose>Chads could just chill And since there aren't enough of these people who are willing to pay, it's terrible for business
>>62599803>Stick to grindr thenFunny joke, anonMaybe it's just in my country, but all the guys I knew who used Bumble were 4/10 and below. Chads used Tinder most of the time
>>62595361what is AI going to do? women already get what they want: chad. if you successfully arrange a date, your internal score moves up. and the algorithm suggests you to more women.
>>62599815which country?tinder has always been more mainstream but it has so many bots and women who make accounts with no intention of dating anyone
>>62599824its a hookup app, anon. why would they want to date?
>>62599891well before you have seggs you typically go on a date first lol
>>62599784How did they earn money? Add?
>>62600513Yes, my understanding was that they made their money through advertisements.
>>62596890Not to mention its full of bots or link farmers. Tinder is worse but thats not saying much when theyre both equally worthless
>>62596781To be fair they dont actual need that to make money. Whether they would do it is a different story.
>>62599748How do you get people to signup when there are no users? How do you fund whatever draw in mechanism is before you have paying customers? How do you solve the problem of people want a network effect but all wanna be a leech?
>>62596890If you swipe to much they shit on your visibility. Same with messaging to multiple women which can get you banned. I only swiped on like 10 women total on Tinder and got 1 match from another chick a month later. Its all fucked m8 she never replied to me or anything
I'm old enough to know that dating apps were an absolute goldmine when they first came out, one week I nut inside 3 different women all from Tinder, now I can go months without a single match.They pozzed the algorithm big time along with massive hoeflation in recent years and it combined to make it not worth using for anything other than the peak of top tier men, in which case they don't need it and can get women elsewhere but some will still enjoy the convenience of sitting at home and arranging an easy fuck.
>>62600853Assemble a marketing team to come up with a campaign built on a promise of an honest dating site that isn't owned by shareholders who demand more and more profit every year.Like... create a buffer sign-up period to preregister before the platform officially goes live.>before you have paying customersNo. The customers must NOT pay. Funding will need to be worked out with advertisers. It's not going to be as profitable as subscription services, but that's not the point. The point is to do a service to humanity.>How do you solve the problem of people want a network effect but all wanna be a leech?What do you mean by this? Basically, the desire of people wanting to browse an established network of dating profiles without wanting to contribute by creating their own (quality) profile?
