>>62597980
yeah youre a fucking retard if you think it can do anything close to a 10x

where is the capital going to come from its already normified and institutional buyers are all in, the ones who want to be anyway

>>62597980
>Reminder that Bitcoin is an IQ test.
you hid cycle 1 and 2 because you're full of shit

>>62597980
You really have to believe that over time states/currencies will crumble and people will run to BTC as a way to protect their savings. And then I guess people will actually start using BTC for daily transactions.
Fundamentally BTC isn't suited to the latter though. It just isn't grandma safe.

>>62598123
>over time
Uh buddy, the carry trade started unwinding already and we’re about to have the biggest energy crisis in modern history
>states/currencies will crumble and people will run to BTC as a way to protect their savings.
That’s my theory and why I contemplated grabbing a small bag of goy gold myself. It will get rug pulled once everyone is on board the ship

>>62598131
What I meant is that in a large scale crash where everyone is in the shitter together that's bad for BTC as people will more likely exit their crypto positions at the same time for the same reasons. But if they fail irregularly, then the rest of the world holds BTC up and provide a stable alternative.

Michael saylor on big youtuber podcast interview last week. His strategy is to ask A I what to do.