[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: HPx7f5DX0AAMh-b.jpg (187 KB, 1500x2100)
187 KB JPG
Something is cooking...

https://x.com/ENERGY/status/2088680637729316925
https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/stocks/articles/american-fusion-inc-otc-amfn-215100367.html
>>
In particular, read page 32 of the DoE roadmap.

https://www.energy.gov/documents/fusion-science-and-technology-roadmap

>For reasons related to confinement physics and engineering, the lowest-cost fusion power plant may not be a tokamak. For instance, the intrinsic steady-state plasma properties of the stellarator could provide economic advantages by eliminating the need for auxiliary plasma current drive sources and their associated recirculating power costs. The cylindrical geometry inherent in concepts such as magnetic mirrors, field-reversed configurations, and Z-pinches offers substantial engineering and manufacturing simplifications compared to the tokamak, which could significantly reduce the cost of fusion power. Perhaps the greatest cost savings may come from confinement strategies that burn aneutronic fuels. Given the potential of these concepts to provide the most cost-effective fusion power, advancing the physics basis of non-tokamak devices to a level comparable to or exceeding that of the tokamak is crucial.
>Perhaps the greatest cost savings may come from confinement strategies that burn aneutronic fuels.
>aneutronic

https://americanfusionenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/Texatron_White_Paper.pdf
>>
>>62598610
Fusion is interesting, but will not be economical in your lifetime. Why? Because it is unnecessary. Existing fission tech is already capable of supplying all human energy needs for a thousand years. All that is needed is to ignore the anti-nuke fools, implement thorium and breeder tech, and voila! Fusion adds nothing at this point.
>>
>white paper
How do I invest in fusioncoin
>>
>>62598665
>Fusion adds nothing at this point.
The size of a 500MW aneutronic fusion reactor can fit in a small boat, jet or spacecraft. They are far more compact.
>>
>>62598673
The ticker is on the Yahoo Finance page.
>>
And it will be use to boil water as always
>>
>>62598686
Aneutronic fusion does not boil water. It extracts electrical power directly from the magnetic field of the fused plasma.
>>
>>62598610
HAS NOBODY WATCHED SPIDERMAN 2!?
>>
In an age where everything needs to be hyped to the moon and back to get investors I am rather sceptical. Especially because even if it is sound conceptually (haven't read it and most of it will likely be over my head) the power industry and its accompanying lobbies won't welcome a new competitor with open arms



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.