If you quit, how bad would it be for your employer?
>>62599696Catastrophic and I'm doing it in a month
>>62599698Nice. Very nice.
>>62599696They wouldn't even notice
I still receive emails from former employers that are looking to fill positions. They go straight into the trash, once a company is out, its out, never going back, not for more pay, not for more benefits not for a blow job. Get fucked and die
>>62599696It’s funny that this thread gets posted because I was thinking about resigning by the end of this month. It’s been something I have been thinking about for a while actually. To answer your question, It would fuck them up for at least a year
>>62599696they would be back up and running within a month. people delude themselves into thinking they are more important and irreplaceable than they really are. even if your a brain surgeon you should realize that india is filled with millions of educated people able to replace you within a moments notice. all they need is a visa.
>>62599705I feel I'm missing some context. Why do you have this rule? Is it like: you only quit a job when the company is awful, so they're all awful companies?
Barely even notice. Everyone loves working overtime since it's incentive pay, not actually time spent. We can do a "13 hour day" in 8 hours.T. Canada post
>>62599696I have them by the nut sack at the moment. They sent me out to a job site across the country as part of a four man team. The other 3 engineers dropped out so now it’s just me out here running it. I leveraged it into a $10k raise.
>>62599696Catastrophic, considering I am my employer.
>>62599730I usually switch company every 3 years latest when the company is okay because I get bored and start to develop a hate being around the same normal faggots and corpo clowns, listening to the same shit and doing the same shit. Its better to quit than to come to the office with a .309 one day and act. Going back would just increase the probability that one random work day ends with dozens of normal faggots with bullet holes
>>62599696Wouldn't be too bad for the big boss on top of the ladder but my manager and team would need to figure out some esoteric bullshit bugs that I deal with on the daily. If I don't manually fix certain things that should in theory be fully hands off automatic, they become ticking time bombs that could lead to fines. Work in the department would also simply slow down since I'm the only person proficient in IT, and that's quite rare in my field so the new guy wouldn't actually properly replace me.There's also the issue of my manager being a reformed mobber (not really lmao) so she's very desperate not to have anyone leave. Big boss would likely invite me for a talk like he did with the last 2 people that left and finally kick the bitch manager out.
Im pretty sure I have to give my job 90 days notice so it would be bad but enough time to adjust
no one would noticeI was once sick with the flu for a week and when I came back no one had any idea I was gone
>>62599696they would probably scramble to hire 10 jeets to replace me. plus a scrum master plus a tech navigator plus a business analyst
>>62599696My employer and her boyfriend couldn't get me to quit, so she fired me right after our 9 month grace period. It remains the only time I won a wrongful termination claim. An environment focused entirely on beating competent people up isn't a work environment, so nothing would happen either way.
It would be felt, but only because it's a small team and, even as a new member, I'm one extra body.It would be felt the least out of every single person there though - apart from maybe some useless admin jobs that could probably be an automated spreadsheet.
>>62599999checked and didn't read