>Trillions have been invested in AI and it will never be profitable>if you don’t count the 2 biggest AI companies it’s a small industry>the data centres poison black neighbourhoods Refute him. Why should the bubble not pop?
>>62605695>black neighbourhoodsis it cleans white neighbourhoods?
>>62605695so we can keep building those data centers
>>62605695It’s not meant to be profitable, it is the NWO system that will govern and corral the goyim herds into slavery and servitude. The data centres, the flock cameras, etc, it’s all infrastructure to enslave the masses. https://youtu.be/UrEUzKTt7j0?si=l8Dm5860V9Hs9tbq
>>62605695self-fulfilling prophecy. SpaceX is not worth 2 trillion but banks helped them to set a fraudulent valuation, which enables them to sell massively inflated stock, effectively printing money (dunking on retail), which they can then use to buy businesses or make investments in order to become worth 2 trillion. Basically the same thing with OpenAI and Anthropic, which will have policymakers and financiers pulling the strings behind the scenes to make things work out
>>62605695>the data centres poison black neighbourhoodsInteresting, tell me more
>>62605695This guy is kinda right but I feel like a LOT LOT of people just eats all of his garbage like its filet mignon. This guy acts like no AI makes any profit, we have had the best year in a long time in earnings and a lot of reasons was AI increasing sales, marketing leads, productivity and selling Cloud. Another myth I hate is that China is dominating us by spending less. Look at the growth on Baidu, they are happy they got a 5 billion dollar boost. That is a DROP of what Google did on Cloud. Microsoft with Anthropic. Stock down 12%. The more AI the big companies have the more prosperous they were.Third dumbest myth ever is that all the AI companies only deal with each other, every company uses AI and in some way it brings in money from someone outside of AI.This guy and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBTYMzwCyQg is why Democrats will ban new data centers and cause a big bottleneck in compute that is wasting a generational opportunity to win in AI.
>>62605695I was against data centres until the last point
>>62605695>the data centres poison black neighbourhoodsanon this is a reddit post. if you're not trolling and care about the well being of all life then you don't belong. Because I can assure you this is not the case. My hometown proves it at least. Seems like they're building them in places with good fresh water (imagine living anywhere else) cheap electricity, starter home areas to mid upper class areas. If it was broke ass areas they do not have time or understanding to even go out to protest
>>62606318With the shortage in compute power the depreciation narrative is simply stupid.The bobo story is in the shadow banking industry of private credit, Private equity buying insurance companies and gambling with the money into their shit projecta and rising interests rates globally, barely anyone is talking about this which makes sense if they want baggies to take the L while missing into a generational wealth generating oportunity
>>62605695>I NEED MY HECKIN PLASTIC CELEBRITY AI PORN TO LOOK EVEN MORE PLASTIC AND FAKE>HECKIN' BOOOBIEEEES HAHA
>>62605695Pretending it's only bad for black "people" is a pretty desperate shilling tactic
>>62606826>This meme made by mossad meme dept
>>62605695>Let the fire alarm chirp because low batteries>But somehow the noise a data center does is a problemFucking hypocrites
>>62605695They will keep pouring trillions into it because the AI race is a winner takes all scenario. Whoever gets to build skynet first gets to enslave the whole world and be powerful beyond just having a ton of money
>>62606957>IT'LL BE JUST LIKE IN MY HECKIN HOLLYWOOD MOVIES! :O (SÖYFACE)>WE TOTALLY HAVE ACTUAL INTELLIGENCE AND NOT JUST SOME LAME PROGRAMMING THAT TRIES AND FAILS TO IMITATE HUMANITY BY COPYING SAMPLES>TWO AI HAVING A CONVERSATION WITH EACH OTHER DEFINITELY DOESN'T DEVOLVE INTO RETARDATION IN A MATTER OF MINUTES 100% OF THE TIME! :O
>>62606957LLMs are nowhere near AGI. You can see improved models and diminishing returns in some horizon and then the LLM will become a comodity as everyone will just copy the best model.Even then LLMs are amazing and you should use them to boost your productivity
>>62606957The only use case for LLMs will be coding, surveillance and search engines. I feel like anti-AI people correctly understand the financial problems and the fact that it isn't AGI, but they don't seem to get that you don't need AGI to have coding better than jeets, and the government doesn't care about profitability when it comes to establishing an AI surveillance net via a companies that are really a front for the deep state like openAI and palantir.
>>62607070it is way more than that, LLMs will make physics and mathematics simple as fuck. You can be PHD level physicist with an LLM and some basic notions of math and intuition
>>62605695>if you don’t count the 2 biggest AI companies it’s a small industrywow great argument
>>62606830>Hypothesis: AI is a bubble and it will pop, because profitability, circular-financing and yada yada..Also, it's bad for black folks(?) which has nothing to do with the AI bubble he believe is there. He may be right about the AI-bubble (idk), but arguing a bearish-case like it's a pro's and con's list, where the aim is to list as many con's as possible, is nonsense.It's not an aggregate thing.
>>62607008>LLMs are nowhere near AGIIf you introduce an element of time, then we probably already have AGI.Like you could probably get Claude to accomplish every possible cognitive task that a human could do - it would just take a long time for some of them.
> https://isaiprofitable.com/KEK BAGGOTS
>>62606826I love iran, hate the great satan and hate ai porn or anything ai.
>>62606773Folks need to listen
>>62607119It's a great argument when neither of them are profitable and seemingly have no path toward being so since the product and service they provide aren't protected by existing IP laws and can be replicated simply by interacting with it for long enough.
>>62607130it can't play simple games like checkers without allucinating.
>>62606318>t. AIUs humans are able to look past the sales pitch anout how it can cut costs for a business and focus directly on the source. AI companies are not profitable. It doesn't matter if they help ypur business. Your business is not going to keep the AI business afloat.
>>62606830It's known as the appeal to retards fallacy.
>>62607130>Like you could probably get Claude to accomplish every possible cognitive task that a human could do - it would just take a long time for some of them.i can't fathom the depths of mental retardation that are necessary to believe this. thought experiment: if you give every african nigger access to all of the world's textbooks and research journals, will they ever evolve to technological advancement, self governance, etc?
>>62607130We are a long way away from generalised intelligence. We are very close to the star trek computer however, though it probably won't suddenly spawn a sentient hologram.
It's more useful than the menards visualizer and my paint skills for making renders of what my ugly house would look like if I made it less ugly for my planned remodel. Its so ugly that I get targeted ads from "we buy ugly houses" on my yt TV app. AI LLMs are still dumb as shit and you have to words words words tell it exactly what to do and exactly what not to do or it will just smash images together like it has zero IQ.
>>62607797Damn what an ugly boring house do you live in like Ohio
>>62607862Basically. It's all the same in the Midwest.
>>62607368OpenAI and Anthropic have spearheaded this unparalleled technological revolution.I think they need government protection so that their rightful profits will be guaranteed.
>>62605695The "bubble popping" only means the smaller AI companies using LLMs as wrappers for their shitty niche services are gonna go bust.AI is the most important arms race in human history. On a nation state level, neither the USA nor China, nor Russia, nor Israel are ever going to halt development. Because once you create a machine that can genuinely think and learn like a human then it's game over for human brains. You don't need human ingenuity anymore at that point, you just need the 1 machine intelligence and infinitely scale that to solve all problems. Anyone thinking otherwise is a fucking moron.
>>62607919This is y2k level of fear mongering. We dont have AI. We have chatbots 2.0 and they are useful tools for imagez video and text generation (code is just words words words). This retard bubble will unwind just like the last retarded dotcom bubble unwound while the tech that fueled the retarded hype/fear frenzy remains and becomes boring everyday tech that we can't imagine living without. Nothing ever happens.
>>62608205Again, it doesn't matter if we don't have true AI right now. That's not the point. The focus is that it's the most important arms race in human history and that flew right past your head somehow.You don't need AI to be a god right away. You just need it to accelerate your research capabilities, and it is accomplishing just that. It's even solving math problems that have eluded humans for decades. Eventually we will hit a singularity point. The timing of it is irrelevant because the first nation state or megacorp across the line wins the prize.
>>62608648> You just need it to accelerate your research capabilitiesWhich it can never do because the "AI" we've created isn't actually intelligent or creative enough to do research and never will be. It just copy pastes samples it's taken.>It's even solving math problems that have eluded humans for decades[citation needed]>Eventually we will hit a singularity point.>*points to television* :OYeah the heckin singularity heckin cool word you learned watching the Big Bang Theory :O
>>62608889Claude solved the Jacobian paradox and I have used Gemini to build Hamiltonians to solve actual problems at work (I guide it but it speeds things exponentially). You are completely clueless
>>62608901>I guide itahahahaha!>"AI" was used as the heckin glorified calculator that it is to solve Jacobian paradox, a concept in the board game backgammon! We definitely needed that solved by a glorified calculator and that means it's creative like humans and will take over the heckin WORLDERINO!>BAZINGA!!!!
>>62608932Terence Tao uses Claude to do research but I bet you are smarter than him LMAO. Denying the power of LLMs for research and productivity is just a result of being to stupid of exploiting it. You are the equivalent of a boomer that thought that computers were a gimmick in the 80's
>>62605695compelling argument but I still don't like them
>>62608941>You aren't as smart as [human] so that means AI is actually intelligent, and that's why I keep mentioning how it speeds up productivity as a tool and never show evidence of actual intelligence! BUT IT WILL BECOME SKYNET FROM MY HECKIN MOVIES AND REPLACE HUMAN CREATIVITY AND INTELLIGENCE!>You're just a heckin boomer because you think "AI" is the equivalent of a computer but it's actually a... co.. computer... umm I mean...>IT SOLVED THE HECKIN PARADOX FOR BACKGAMMON THAT A HUMAN COULD HAVE ALSO FIGURED OUT BUT NO ONE GAVE ENOUGH OF A SHIT TO BOTHER SO RECENTLY SOMEONE USED THE GLORIFIED CALCULATOR TO DO IT!>CHECKMATE!>BAZINGAAAA!
>>62608941And yet no one won the computer race or the internet race and got to the heckin singularityarino. They are useful tools available world wide and the same has already happened with LLMs. If you cant figure out how to use these retarded chatbots then will very soon be like a boomer that doesn't know how to use a computer or the internet. Thats the bad end. There will be no end game all jerbs go away horse shit where any nation wins the LLM race and by harnessing chatbots with the knowledge base of reddit. Inb4>but but AI + ROBOTICSThat's low IQ doomerbait. We already have robotics. We already have """"AI""""
>>62608889>Which it can never do becauseYou are objectively wrong and retarded. It is literally being used to accelerate research and aid others in workflow efficiency right now.>>62608932>>I guide itWhat difference does it make if it's guided, done autonomously, or controlled entirely by my farts as long as it gets results, nitwit?
>>62608994I never said there will be a singularity, but that LLMs are incredibly powerful and not an irrelevant technology as this retard thinks >>62608982
>>62605695Do you think Ed Zitron worries about the Ed Zitron bubble since nobody will pay this doomsaying faggot for his stupid blog when he can no longer sperg out about AI.
>>62610019The vaccine for cancer is the proof of the circular economy.They have to artificially keep alive potential consumers there are so little demand for AI.
