Discuss. Don’t forget it is a pyramid and the gap between income level.
source?
>>62606414I make over 100k after taxes as a security guard lol
>>62606422Probably in a big city with max hours?>>62606418I don’t know, discuss it.
The use of the term 'salary' is the problem here.For example let's say I'm super jewish and take out FAFSA loans (25k) and only spend part of them while keeping the rest of the disbursement for 'school costs'. I also work 2 jobs, bumping it up to 3 when not taking classes. Let's say I was also making 20k on stocks. That's 45k+50k+25k=120kThis isn't so difficult, but getting it to all shake out the way I want might be.Then I go online and call you a broke bitch for not being like me and working+studying 80 hours a week.The REAL sticking points are1) salaried 40 hour a week 100k2) jobs that pay more than that, like 200k
>>62606500> 2) jobs that pay more than that, like 200kWhat?
>>62606422Security anon, how do you do it? What kind of site, do you work for the big 3? Clearances? Etc -fellow security anon
>>62606414My account manager makes 80k, the guy above him makes probably a little over 100k, as a district manager which is just overseeing accounts within a city. Any corporation has these account/district/regional manager jobs which are over 100k. None of the work is hard it’s just tediously meeting meaningless compliance metrics on some in house software program/app
>>62606494>>6260650940 hours, security clearance. It's a big city but I bet it's not one of the first 30 you'd name if guessing
>>62606519This actually makes sense. Give or take 10-20k. You pretty much summed up mainstream white collar. Majority, as in, 95% of people will never cross a $200k salary.
>>62606530Chandler AZ. Big but no one has ever heard of it.
Because cost of living is probably very different in different parts of the country and most of the country is rural so city salaries are the outlier
>>62606414>1 in 5This includes all women, deplorables, dindus, gender studies graduates and future doctors and engineers. When it comes to peers, it is 3 in 4 at least.
