or will it be like in 2020 and late 2023 where Bitcoin followed Link's lead out of the bottom of the bear?
>>62607271History has shown that when dumping is no longer an option they try pumping BTC instead
Lol schizos in the chat
>>62607318thisthey will pump btc so that linkies start dumping their stinks out of FOMO
>>62608262Are we schizos when we are right consistently?
>>62607267funny if true. will not sell anyway
$10 brokeBTC will start dumping to 65k any minute now
>>62607267The price of btc has nothing to do with the price of link. It is just a single low IQ poster who posts that same picture of the day the DTCC announced. kek It is such a stupid narrative it is crazy.
>>62608498>It is just a single low IQ poster who posts that same picture There are literally hundreds of these examples
>>62608498I grilled him one time on why doesn't he do anything substantial with this information seeing as its been years of effort spamming at this point and his response was to post more of his nothing burger charts
>>62608498>>62608553newfags
>>62608570skeew erom owT
>>62608498No this is an outright lie
>>62607267looks like the answer is yes
>>62608705This is actually the preferred outcome, kicking off a BTC pump would suck all the wind out of links sails
>>62608553>why doesn't he do anything substantial with this informationlike what?
>>62608498Hahahaha kys summerfaggot
>>62607318wow, called it
>>62608536You just choose arbitrary points that price for link would not move more than a few percent up on the news of anyways that correspond with a drop and read into it WAY too much because you are obsessed with one token and form a worldview around it excluding everything else and are low IQ and bad at highschool level statistics.>>62608570I have been here longer than you. >>62608586It isn't and it isn't even arguable.>>62609022I have bern here longer than you.>>62608553kek You'd expect nothing less.
>>62609371>You just choose arbitrary pointsLooks to me like those "arbitrary points" are simply points where Link news drops.
>>62609033Yeah the world revolves around crypto. Definitely not due to the Treasury initiating not QE to bail out the corporate bond market as swaptions are pricing a financial markets arab spring moment and the Chairs of the CFTC/SEC meeting at the White House with the President and crypto CEOs a day after the SEC submitted their proposed crypto agency guidance and the Treasury came out announcing rulemaling on GENIUS. Definitely it is not the liquidity conditions of the global broad market which crypto is basically a levered proxy of alongside the biggest specific marketwide legal clarity moment in a decade with the White House celebrating and meeting on it after Clarity hit difficulty in the senate, it is for sure all just to do with one random eth shitcoin with zero utility that is not even used in products hitting $10. Definitely rational and makes sense. The crazy thing is I'm actually not even strawmanning you or exaggerating your position at all.
>>62609007>a trillion dollar asset has been completely taken over by bad actors for the singular purpose to suppress a <$10B oracle provider >i am completely helpless in the face of this fact to do anything but spam the same charts for 2+ years or even attempt to swing trade this clear manipulation 2 more weeks
>>62609411lol See pic related in >>62609371Seems like a really interesting and serious trend to definitely interpret the world through! Super smart!
>>62609422>no answerfigures>>62609423You're posting trends. We're not talking about trends; we're talking about immediate reactions.
oh look the verbose mentally ill retard is back. kys
>>62609433I've been through this exact chain of replies with you a few times already. There's really nothing anyone can say at this point and I feel disgusted with myself for engaging with this shit againAll i can say is good luck
>>62607267Apparently not
>>62609433No you are wrong, the causation is just deeper. Look at the correlation! To see how low IQ you are see pic related.
>>62609412>>62609371Gishgallop attaaaaaaack
>>62609604Learn to properly understand a single logical fallacy
>>62609423i often get super drunk while watching nicholas cage movies in my pool and have almost drowned a few times. so that explains that
>>62609578If you were trying to put together a representative list of major Link news, then what the fuck are you doing nigger.Half your list is from 2026, full on bear market. Any green there was a brief lull in an absolute ocean of red.Every single bit of seminal news put out by Link got massively dumped on: - the very announcement of CCIP in early 2022- the live launch of CCIP- the announcement of long-awaited staking details (whitepaper 2.0)- the live launch of staking- the 2023 reconnection from Swift after years of no word from them- the announcement of Swift doing live trials with HSBC, Citi, ... in January 2026- the announcement of DTCC out of the blue in 2023- the announcement of DTCC saying they're going live later this year- the announcement of DTCC using Chainlink in tokenization (unexpected)Two of the examples from my list gave shape to this year's bear market, see pic.And this is just the tip of the iceberg.
>>62607267
>>62609659Same. It is so common it is probably a law of the universe and clearly all safety standards everywhere are determined by Cage movie releases.>>62610115INSANE cope. Btw in reading this, the only real major dump (staking details) is from Terra Luna and Celsius (other frauds) blowing up and has ZERO to do with link. You are a pathologically fixated retard pushing the lowest IQ narrative conceivable. It is literally inarguably retarded. There is no trend or reaction etc. you are just choosing to fixate on a small handful of announcements that drive your conclusion from a company that announce new price feeds that don't even remotely impact token value or use every week. It is spurious, extremely shitty descriptive statistics with literally equivalent predictive weight to astrology. You are LITERALLY operating at that level of analysis and equivalent to them thinking you are tapped into the deep system of things. It is unbelievably stupid and insufferable.
>>62610115>>62610530Lol
>>62610115Both of your key dates:>SWIFT reconnectionIn early June 2023 the SEC filed major lawsuits against Binance and Coinbase. Trading volumes were already low, and the market was in a risk-off mood. The Swift collaboration news landed during this regulatory sell-off.>SWIFT live trialsEscalating tariff threats and US and EU and US Iran tensions amid massive bitcoin ETF outflows and levered liquidations. Japanese government bond market (which is the absolute root of global liquidity which all things, especially crypto are downstream) sunk into global distress conditioning. >DTCC going liveHotter than expected inflation triggering rate hike expectations in a market that was already turning risk off. Literally none of these events had anything to do with link; you are just statistically illiterate and ignorant of global macro and economics in general.
>>62610598https://warosu.org/biz/thread/58605869and there are countless more examples in the archives. retardhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nEPWUFgfvk
>>62610626Nigger I literally gave a chart and table of key events and pointed out you are cherrypicking dates to drive a narrative like a covidian faggot. Your gay video just got another dislike. Restating the same thing in a different media doesn't change statistical reality just because you are obsessively unwilling to let go of the cope. The price impact of the dates is completely non-existent.
>>62610530>>62610552>>62610598Oh hello there, rambling XRP charlatan.So, you're trying to slither back into link threads once again to shitfling cope around like an enraged ape because you are eternally bitch-made by linkies and even the idea of speculating about a relationship between btc dumps and link news makes you livid. This is probably because you understand that theres more circumstantial evidence around a targeted btc dump relationship to link than any of the deranged fanboy shit you've ever posted about XRP, and you just cant hack it lmao.Your posts here are almost as embarrassing as whatever the fuck you were trying to do in this which you quickly abandoned>>62590067Just stay in your containment thread until you can figure out how to dislodge your head from your own ass thanks, your "material" has never survived outside of environments made up of other desperate XRP fags.
>>62610705"Quickly abandoned." You mean, "consistently stayed in and proved my claims all morning and you then came in 8 hours later and posted the same corny type of long nothing after everyone had stopped posting?" Lol It is UNREAL you accuse me of writing long posts when every single thread you post in is just the same redundant trite name calling and long winded gush saying LITERALLY nothing for like 3 paragraphs in the tone of an anime monologue in one of those gay animes about an unconfident protagonist who finds himself the unlikely inept hero which I know you have watched hundreds of.
>>62610846You didn't prove a single thing in that thread.Show me where you actually had proof of link paying for anything? I mean actual proof. Not some dim-witted conspiracy theory based on your widdle feefees which are basically "I am eternally assblasted about link and dont think its function is important enough for crypto journalists to talk about, and I am in complete denial about what it actually does and who has explicitly said they will be using it.">>62593106Summed the thread up pretty nicely as one example and you fucked off. Just one response of several that you never actually addressed. So do go on, you impotent yapping faggot. I dare you to push out another spiel about gish gallop and gush and anime protagonists and whatever other pseud manchild nonsense projections are rattling around in that empty head of yours instead of answering simple questions (as always.)
>>62610937GIve a coherent contrary argument that makes sense to the context. Why was a very unpopular project simultaneously being spammed by multiple crypto influencer/journos but no mention of other projects named in same context, which are objectively much more popular and were given a higher price appreciation target. He didn't even say anything. You do this in literally every single thread. You come in at the absolute end of the thread and spam the most insufferable shit ever that says and contributes nothing and no matter what just do the same thing in response every single time always in the tone of an extreme anime faggot. It makes this board not even fun to engage with. Lol
>>62610937>>62611142I am >>62610661 in case it isn't clear. I have been between phone fagging on data and phone fagging on wifi.
>>62610937Further in the reply you made, again like 7 hours after the thread already died, through the gayest most reddit tier rhetorical framing, you even misrepresent my claim. My core claim is not even that Sirgay paid the analyst who is literally always wrong to include link in his note (though this is definitely very possible). I said its publicization was clearly paid for, because it clearly was, with basically zero rational alternative for its specific publicization on social media once more in context of what is described in >>62611142. It is insanely gay to write such an annoying nothing that fails to even attempt to address the core claim itself 7 hours after every stopped posting in a back and forth way and then come back a week later and act like it is some kind of win. What an unbelievable faggot you are.
>>62610705>that thread
>>62611142Alright, lets pretend that the burden of proof isn't entirely on you to prove who paid for what coverage, because youre just throwing shit at the wall and hoping something sticks at this point.Maybe, just maybe link isn't "very unpopular." Or maybe upcoming DTCC / SWIFT infrastructure usage makes it a noteworthy crypto to include and discuss? Or the fact that it's THE dominant oracle in crypto without the prior fact?What is your threshold for "popularity" relative to what crypto journalists or analysts are allowed to report or not report on? It was noteworthy enough to show up in this report initially, which was such a huge deal for you, so why wouldn't journalists cover it?And you're acting like link was the only thing focused on by other outlets when I can see 8+ articles focusing specifically on other mentions such as xrp and solana apiece with a simple google search. What actual uncanny "context" did you bring up that isn't based entirely on the fact that you froth at the mouth when link specifically is mentioned?>>62611151So... if the analyst is always wrong then why do you give a shit about anything he includes in the report in the first place or any coverage of anything in it?Youre essentially arguing that there's no rational reason for an outlet to report on link along with several other cryptos that received coverage because it appeared in a report... based entirely on "it was just clearly paid for... because I dont like it"And you can keep saying that I didn't "address the core claim" but all I'm doing is asking you for SOME sort of evidence re: any of the emotional fantasies and theories you cook up in your head and try to pass off as logical and rational but its far from it. > 7 hours after the thread already diedIf the thread was "dead" I wouldn't have been able to reply to it, you dumb cunt. It bumped the thread and kept it alive. Threads don't "die" just because the OP bails.
>>62610530>CCIP announcement 2021-08-05That was a technical blogpost, there was no hype about it at that time until Aave etc. started hyping up CCIP.I was talking about the announcement that they were going live with CCIP, I literally told you "early 2022".Pic is how Bitcoin reacted to that: after months of crabbing Bitcoin instantly started its descent through all kinds of historic resistance.
>>62610530>Staking v0.2Here's how BTC responded to the actually significant announcement of Staking v0.2
>>62607267Looks like btc ended up PUMPING when link pumped. Looks like the linkies BTC suppression theory is debunked. turns out your shitty token has nothing to do with btc
>>62611363Yes, Bitcoin pumped two days after Link first broke out.The same thing happened in late 2023.Almost like Bitcoin is reacting to major Link moves.
>>62610530>DTCC 2023 collaboration announcement 2023-09-16This was a one-sided announcement by Chainlink.Your list already shows a minor downturn, but pic is how Bitcoin reacted when DTCC announced this news themselves a few days later.>Smart NAV pilot completionI never even heard of this announcement; it's a very unsurprising non-news extension of the actually surprising first announcement.
>>62610530Pic is what happened when Robinhood actually went live with Chainlink btw.
>>62611144>I am >>62610661 in case it isn't clearyeah we already knew. You're the verbose crippletit, you always samefag. And sometimes you switch to the wrong ID and then have to make up excuses.
>>62607267No, but that doesn't mean that LINK won't dump. Why care about what BTC does when you can make easy money shorting LINK?
>>62611367>bitcoin always dumps to suppress link >oh except all the times where it pumps.....but its actually pumping because of link... because...uhh.. because it feels real in my head!! Link schizos everyone
>>6261144799% of the time Bitcoin reacts to Link by dumping; but once upon a blue moon it reacts by pumping.Want proof? I literally called this: >>62607271Bitcoin started pumping to 69k just a few hours after this post.
>>62608498Brother, we have seen it time and again. They always mega dump btc when link is about to break out and if that doesn't work btc pumps AND then megadumps to kill all momentum
>>62610661>cherrypickingshowing btc dumping specifically when big announcements happen for link isn't cherry picking you stupid fuck>obsessively unwilling to let go of the copethat's rich coming from you
it should be really easy to backtest this but somehow for years noone has done that
we've been holding $10+ for a handful of hours now, is it time?
>>62612689OHH THEY TRYIN VIOLATE PPL THIS MONTH. Tighten up!
>>62607267It's over bros, our Chainlink journey ends here. The Great Reset timeline has come at a crossroad with humanity. The magic is gone, the memes are stale, the shills have been uncovered, the agendas laid bare for all to see, i-i-it's over marines...only tears from here.
>>62611462Bitcoin pumped because the US announced they are doubling debt buybacks or "QE lite"
>>62611381I literally already detailed how the crash had already begun for completely unrelated reasons. lol Not sure how this is a response to that. You not having heard of something doesn't make it not a big announcement. How about Pangea? Even if you cherrypick from the list to try to make a trend you cannot because the relationship does not exist, unless you also want to attribute the one market dump to a link announcement instead of the collapse of Terra Luna/Celsius/etc.? Lol Why would a secondary announcement a week later matter more than preliminary announcement? Again, this is selectively picking and choosing dates that fit your fake trend to make it seem more pronounced than it is, and that same day saw a .1% (a tenth of one percent) change in the price of bitcoin on both the 1 day and the 7 day.>>62611356This was after the May crash, the drop began a day before, and the price recovered to be positie 5% in the 1d return.>>62611360On the same say, BTC surged to multi-month highs briefly (highest since May 2020). The volatility of the day had some short and long liquidations and the day's session ended in a strong upward move. Lol You are hyperfixating on short duration candles and deliberately misrepresenting what actually happened. And why would the announcement of something matter more to you than the actual launch of it? Could it be perhaps because it helps you falsify the narrative?>>62611405Once more zooming in on minutes length candles. Every single crypto is downstream bitcoin and had the exact same chart at the exact same time, and your own picture shows link up .30% and bitcoin down only .25%.Lol This is DESPERATE cope.
>>62612943Hello XRP feminine writing faggot
>>62611292Holy fucking shit I literally can't believe how much you write to say what you do. The point is crypto journos make money off of clicks and of the projects the note mentions there are a handful that would objectively get more clicks with as dramatic of predictions (again, the analyst who wrote the note is literally always wrong). Almost no one talks about Chainlink except for Chainlink Labs and a handful of about 5 influencers. I am not saying there is zero existing mention of them in press, I am saying on social media, EXTREMELY obviously, the link pieces specifically were promoted in an extreme way for no special reason and that the obvious extremely likely conclusion with basically zero contrary reason for this to be the case is that money made it be this way. I don't care about what he said, I am literally just pointing out how funny it is that linkies were spamming it here as an own when it predicted XRP would have a greater rate of return than link and that the selective coverage was obviously a function of advertising and paid shilling of the exact brand Sirgay literally always does every single announcement he makes even for projects he knows don't use link sizably but he knows will create retail pressure to sell into. You are acting like such an insane faggot like I was making an extreme case before a judge and jury when all I was saying was more or less "Jack likes pecan cookies. James is also in the house but he reliably always prefers chocolate chip cookies. Their mom made both cookies and the chocolate chip ones came out better. When their mom came home from work the pecan cookies were gone and the chocolate chip were barely touched. Who is it reasonable to conclude ate the pecan cookies?" I am not claiming forensic knowledge of their ad spend, I am making a very obvious conclusion and you were failing to even understand what the claim was. Lol
>>62612964Hello samefag no argument having indian paid poster.
>>62611292I didn't say the thread was pruned, you massive reddit faggot, I said it was dead, as in the discussion contained within it had ended a hours before you entered at the tail end after everyone had already abandoned the thread. What an insanely gay attempt at the most desperate semantic ackshually. You NEED to stop watching anime.>>62611739see>>62612943
>>62611462see>>62609412
>>62613004Hahaha go easy on the estrogen tablets bro eat some raw carrots and lift some weights.
>>62612689I wont even entertain hope until it at least doubles from here. I still fell retarded for buying a tenth of my stack at 50
>>62613015you're trying to disprove a minute to minute micro trend, that is easily observable and evidenced, by showing longer term trends, you absolute moron.
>>62613004>Holy fucking shit I literally can't believe how much you write to say what you do.Aside from the fact that most of that was me asking questions about features of your absolutely bizarre and hysterical woman "logic," you then proceeded to dump out a entire padded wall of useless shit that really did just amount to>I um ackshually just don't think they're important enough to talk about and only like 5 people talk about them (in my mind) so my feefees tell me that it was paid for by Sergey because they couldn't possibly have made any money by just talking about something an analyst referencedYou've essentially proved my point though I guess, so good work you spastic fag>>62613015Oh sorry, I genuinely thought that would have been your understanding of how threads worked. The discussion hadn't died at all. Other posts asked you for proof of your retarded claims beyond "link isn't popular enough in my head." You can try to dress it up however you want but you obviously bailed when you realized you essentially had nothing, which is why youre doing such an awkward semi backpedalling effort of it now lol.And what's with your fixation with projecting this anime shit onto other people? Is that how these convos play out in your head? A smug Japanese cartoon character being mean to you? What a fuckin weird and childish loser you are lol
>>62608304post polymarket bets then. powered by chainlink for checking the price.
>>62613898you are very good at milking gish gallop gems out of him
>>62613953Its just his natural response to people unfazed by his incoherent, likely LLM assisted "arguments." He basically feels overwhelmed outside of cripple hugboxes and should probably just stick to that forced general thread which is propped up by the OP self-bumping 100+ times every day. No upsetting reality to get in the way of his fantasies there.
>>62612943>the crash had already begun for completely unrelated reasonsLook at the pic retard. The price cratered the very day of that DTCC post. Look at the arrow.>This was after the May crash, the drop began a day before, and the price recovered to be positie 5% in the 1d return1) this was January2) the drop began THAT DAY3) the price continued to crash for months until it hit 16k at the bottom nearly a year later>On the same say, BTC surged to multi-month highs And the very moment staking v0.2 was announced, it crashed 10%.>zooming in on minutes length candlesYes, because the whole suppression is about Bitcoin's immediate response. Link went up, so Bitcoin dumped.
>>62607267I'm expecting one big shakeout dump on BTC between now and october, then the real bull run begins. If you're holding now, don't sell, you already have a good price. But you might be down for a few weeks.
>>62614130Zoom out. Lol Again, I literally specifically detailed every single day. There are a few coincident ones but even most of the cherrypicked days are not even remotely close to being price suppression moments or even sizable selloffs. Lol>>62614122Corniest projection of all time.>>62613898My nigger, calling me a woman while writing the most languishing, meandering, reddit spaced wall of text nothing through the character of the anime form described is not the winning argument strategy you think. I never claimed the thread died, the discussion 100% had, hours prior, myself not even checking the thread for like 5 hours. Why are you SO concerned with trying to frame this in such a weird way when literally everyone can just go and see the timestamps? I have not backpedaled a single claim. Lmao Me pointing out it would be unexplainably strange through coincidence or natural happening if a crypto with (not in my head, in reality) 1/10th the social media engagement which was covered as underperforming the larger ones got highpowered coverage for no special reason when the CEO has an extreme and basically unparalleled history shilling every ounce of PR musterable is not a reach, it is the by FAR most and basically only reasonable framing of the situation. You literally every single thread write as though you are the unknown anime character who steps in and really puts someone in their place and unironically think that you do because you write a paragraph, but it literally never says anything. You just make sure it is a paragraph length to feel a sense of complete effort or something but it is ALWAYS just meandering gush.
gishgallop cripple here, BOOM
>>62614766>the most languishing, meandering, reddit spaced wall of text nothingLol there's that projection again, an ironic brick in that wall of text. Except for what youre calling "reddit spacing" which is just basic formatting btw>Why are you SO concerned with trying to frame this in such a weird way when literally everyone can just go and see the timestamps?Discussions on a forum dont expire within 5 hours just because you decided to bail lol. That's not weird framing, thats just a fact.Dumping paragraphs of nonsense about how emotionally assraped you are over link isn't an argument whether you bail on it 1 hour in or 24 hours in. The thread was live because other people were still replying to it, there's nothing wrong with me kicking you around as well. If you dont like it you should actually stay in your forced general like I said.As for the actual deranged conspiracy you cooked up in your head, I already explained reasons why outlets would report on link independent of the original report itself which you seemed to think significant enough to obsess over. This isn't hard to understand. And it might confuse you, but the size of twitter botnets which infest discussion around each crypto (link isn't an exception to this,) dont make something more or less worthy of discussion elsewhere despite how you feel, analyst predictions or no. You don't have a real rebuttal for any of this and your take on the coverage isn't "reasonable," its just you being upset because link had a spotlight in the news cycle just like the rest that appeared in the same report. >You literally every single thread write as though you are the unknown anime character who steps in and really puts someone in their placeOh and ANOTHER anime character reference, but I'm some sort of dark horse anime character now? You really need to grow the fuck up and stop rotting your brain with cartoons to the point that this is how you see the world. That's not even debatable at this point.
>>62614766>I literally specifically detailed every single dayYou said shit like "the crash began for other reason" or "the drop began the day before" when my pics show Bitcoin dumping and reversing trend on the Link news with surgical precision.You're a coping liar.
>>62614766>reddit spaced wall of textGreentexting a point from YOUR wall of text and responding to it is pretty much the only way to give any kind of coherence to these arguments, because you tend to ramble and stray off topic almost non-stop. A while ago you also accused me of "reddit spacing" with greentext, whatever the fuck that means. You're truly a newfag if you think this style of structuring replies is not a 4chan staple. >You literally every single thread write as though you are the unknown anime character who steps in and really puts someone in their place and unironically think that you do because you write a paragraph, but it literally never says anythingHoly shit you unironically own a fedora, don't you? >t. the anon that called your diatribes meandering last year and it made such an impression on you that you still use it to this day to describe other people's posts
