Chainlink in all your stocks
They are using Chainlink Data feeds
>>62628001That's neat!How does it benefit me as a token holder?
>>62628023the chainlink reserve is how partnerships like this benefit you
>>62628023
"Through Chainlink Data Feeds, builders across the Base ecosystem have access to continuous pricing forCoinbase's tokenized stocks, including NVDAc, METAc, AAPLc, GOOGLc, and more. This data enables leadingDeFiprotocols, including lending markets,decentralizedexchanges, and structured product platforms, to support tokenized equities as collateral, transforming tokenized equities from standalone tokens into fully composable building blocks."
>>62628038>https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/coinbase-selects-chainlink-to-bring-new-tokenized-stocks-to-millions-of-defi-users-302858414.html
>>62628027>chainlink reserveYou can't be serious. The reserve is clearly a baggie pacifier. A real consideration of token holders would be a real staking update, not "we're buying tiny amounts of link so we can keep dumping on you in an undisclosed later date" >>62628030Yes, I'm aware of PAL. So far it created zero buying pressure on the token. So obviously it doesn't benefit me as a token holder.
>>62628055>staking update>buy backs of Link tokenthere's already staking and monthly $3 million buy backs, but you want an update?Would you instantly change your mind if the staking got an update?
>>62628001Ok thats cool and all but... uhhh... price?? Oh... and.. chart?????
Im getting real tired bros, what the fuck are waiting for? Why aren’t we at $100 already?I don’t want to hear any clarity act cope.
>>62628023This uses Chainlink nodes, and they must be paid in Link.
>>62628071>there's already stakingThat secures a single eth/usd feed on ethereum. There are many more services that chainlink provides. The fact that it's still at v0.2 and securing only a small fraction of the services, makes it seem like they're pivoting away from the token as an integral part of the network. >monthly $3 million buy backs1. The dumps outpace the buybacks by a huge amount2. There is no clarity regarding their off-chain revenue so the buybacks could be pocket change they throw at it, so advocates have a talking point3. There is zero guarantee that they won't dump these tokens back on the market when it's profitable for them>Would you instantly change your mind if the staking got an update?Absolutely. It would signal that they are not abandoning the token in favor of a regular fiat-based business. I am eagerly waiting for this announcement because I have been holding for years, and as time goes by it starts feeling as if we've been duped into financing their operations.>>62628127>This uses Chainlink nodes, and they must be paid in Link.I know. But... what's stopping chainlink labs from moving onto a usd based model? Nodes get paid in usd, nodes stake usd, etc. The feeds will cost $150/month. Notice the $ sign. It's dollars, not LINK. Do we know for certain that this will be converted to link via PAL?
>>62628159>what's stopping chainlink labs from moving onto a usd based model?What's stopping Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, ... from doing that?
>>62628159>Do we know for certain that this will be converted to link via PAL?Yes.Even you know this must happen, since you JUST acknowledged that Chainlink nodes MUST be paid in Link.You're a paid liar. Every single day you're in here doing this exact same spiel.
>>62628169>What's stopping Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, ... from doing that?Technically nothing, but they're completely different types of projects.Also, >doesn't answer the question>answers a question with a question>brings up other projects when the discussion is about chainlink (deflecting)>>62628226>Yes.You're speculating. You don't really know that.>Even you know this must happen, since you JUST acknowledged that Chainlink nodes MUST be paid in Link.I hope you're right. >You're a paid liar. Every single day you're in here doing this exact same spiel.Nothing I said was a lie, since I didn't make any concrete statements. The concerns I'm raising are the same concerns link holders from CT are raising daily.If anyone here is dishonest, it's you. You ignored the rest of my lengthy post and cherry picked a single sentence with an answer no one here can verify.
>>62628159This post is making me experience fear, doubt, and uncertainty
>>62628252>Technically nothingExactly.>You're speculatingI'm really not.Nodes must be paid in Link, this is an irrefutable fact.And every single Chainlink product uses the nodes.
>>62628269
>>62628373
>>62628001Attention all linkies, baggies and fourth industrial resolution shills reading thisHave you no shame, no decency, no morals or soul? If you stay your course and don't repent and turn away from your grievous sins, your souls are consigned to hell in the afterlife for your despicable, disgusting and evil acts in this life.No one likes you, appreciates you, looks up to you, respects you, or can even stand you. Everyone hates and despises you and has nothing but disdain and contempt for you, even the genocidal tyrants whose eager enforcers and accessories in genocide and crimes against humanity you are. You are despicable evil. You are revolting to all decency and morality. You are a disgrace and a stain on history. You are foot soldiers and cruel attack dogs of murderous despots. Your names and memory will live in infamy. You will be pointed to as examples of the worst dregs of humanityLinkies will stand trial at Nuremberg 2.0 and be hanged for their heinous complicity and accessory to genocide and crimes against humanity as well as their loyalty to genocidal tyrants.Everyone alive to witness Nuremberg 2 will cheer your sentencing and rejoice at your execution. No one will come visit your graves, which will be nameless, or lay flowers for you there, not even your spouses, parents or children. They will be ashamed to have been related to you, married to you, descended from you or to have borne your name.Stop. Think. Reconsider. Repent. Denounce Chainlink and ask for forgiveness for all the evil you have already committed.Apologize to and ask for forgiveness from the innocent anons you've been oppressing, repressing and persecuting.Resign or reverse course and help the resistance against the Great Reset which is unfolding while there is still time to make a difference and before you have even more innocent blood on your hands
>>62628499>Linkies will stand trial at Nuremberg 2.0the laws are in favor of Chainlink
>>62628507companies that don't use Chainlink could be legally liable
>>62628294>Nodes must be paid in LinkAnd they sell the linkThe token does not need high value for the services to function.
>>62628729>nodes can sell rewards!So can nodes for Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, ... You keep bringing up "fud" that applies to 99% of crypto.
>>62628729they're incentivized to hold because they have more collateral for higher value transactions
>>62628159>The fact that it's still at v0.2 and securing only a small fraction of the services, makes it seem like they're pivoting away from the token as an integral part of the network.that's a weird thing to say since it is literally required for all network functions
>>62628877As it stands Staking is only for the Eth feed. Are you being purposely disingenuous?
>>62629303no, the chainlink coin is required for every single thing the network does.
>>62628159>I know. But... what's stopping chainlink labs from moving onto a usd based model? Nodes get paid in usd, nodes stake usdso the oracles will be dependent on the whims of the forex market? i don't think so
>>62629387Oh yea that part is true and fudniggers are butthurt their 6 year long “token not needed” campaign was a ruse.
>>62628742These are blockchains, not middleware. You keep using arguments as if the underlying asset is the same and has the same function. Middleware is not a chain and vice versa. >>62628757That would require an improved version of staking. >>62628877The dollar is used to transact for all kinds of things. It is required even, to get access to certain markets. Its has lost nearly all its value since incenption. Forcing use does not make it have value
>>62629557>Comparing a fixed supply token to the us dollar Top fuggin kek fuddies are retarded
>>62629565>misses the point and focusses on inflation instead of focussing on forcing use of usd as means of exchange worldwideBut the inflation applies too, about 8% per year till 2030. You keep stacking right marine ?
>>62629590Tapers off in absolute terms an completely stops in 2030. Nothingburger.
>>62628127Sergey charges them $100 usd and pays the node from his uncirculated stack he minted for free, the node then dumps this link on the market for cash and the circulating supply increases.
>>62628127and they must have some reason to hold onto this link such as it being used as collateral for services in order to make data buyers trust them?
>>62629557>These are blockchains, not middleware.Here come the semantics.>>62629732Payment abstraction converts to Link on Uniswap.>>62629784No crypto has ever needed such a reason to pump.
>>62628001i have 50% of my net worth in chainlink and i hope it will crash to 0. I hate myself and let my girlfriend to fuck niggers.
>>62628509You're a paid shill, but the videos you (always) post illustrate the brainlet audience you're aiming at. It's always guys just saying handwaving things. Things of no substance. But, because the images are of smart looking men sitting in front of an audience and seemingly "experts" you are fooling people into thinking what they are seeing is meaningful. Throw in some technobabble and you have the retards on the hook for a few more weeks. You are a terrible person who really deserves cruel punishment, and I hope you are seriously, irreversibly injured one day.
>>62628001>Chainlink in all your stocksno matter how hard you wipe, there is always some residue. but it's so miniscule, it's not harmful
>>62630003i functionally have 100%+ of my networth in chainlink due to credit card debt and restitution and im a nigger that fucks other guys girlfriends
>>62629966>Here come the semantics.There is the dodgeThey dont have the same function, the same tokenomics nor same issuance. They are not interchangeable. The way you advocates dartle around the point is so ogre.There is no reason why link should have a higher price.
p+c
>>62629966>Payment abstraction converts to Link on Uniswap.Yet not a single bit of that "$100 MILLION+" they claim to have made goes through it, or will go through it.
>>62628009Great, so we'll only dump 10% this time instead of the usual 20-30?
