[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/biz/ - Business & Finance

Name
Options
Comment
Verification
4chan Pass users can bypass this verification. [Learn More] [Login]
File
  • Please read the Rules and FAQ before posting.

08/21/20New boards added: /vrpg/, /vmg/, /vst/ and /vm/
05/04/17New trial board added: /bant/ - International/Random
10/04/16New board for 4chan Pass users: /vip/ - Very Important Posts
[Hide] [Show All]


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1762197244080489.png (38 KB, 512x234)
38 KB PNG
>>
>>62640495
not chainlink
>>
he meant that the bot detects and removes scam adverts and does the same with chainlink posts. if you thought someone is "suppressing link", it's just the bot doing its work
>>
PENIS!
>>
File: HQ2x1CvXwAAQPmo.jpg (59 KB, 1179x658)
59 KB JPG
#14 crypto btw, behind a memecoin with a dog on it
>>
>>62640535
I hate this market so fucking much.
>>
File: 1779508586749023.png (48 KB, 602x212)
48 KB PNG
>>62640502
No but also yes
>>
>>62640541
Nufag linker here. Anon can you spoon fed me and dispel the token not needed fud? Will there come a time when services using chainlink will actually create demand for the link token itself?
>>
>>62640552
>Will there come a time when services using chainlink will actually create demand for the link token itself?
That time came in May 2019.
>>
>>62640554
Elaborate anon??
>>
>>62640557
Ever since Chainlink went live on mainnet in 2019, nodes have been paid only in Link.
>>
>>62640557
>>62640552
CLL still has a couple hundred milly LINK to subsidize the network, so it'll be a few more years until full dilution. After that, though, we enter true price discovery, and before that is pure speculation. If it's as useful as we think and if DLT is actually better than legacy infra, LINK should appreciate considerably. That's also assuming the full implementation of staking is released concurrently (or before, doesn't matter). But full dilution + staking = LINK reaching its potential.
>>
>>62641117
>it'll be a few more years until full dilution
This is true for pretty much all cryptos.
Stop trying to use this "argument" as fud, it's not.
>>
>>62640495
He wants it to pump. He did the same thing with DOGE. His mere mention of it sends it up.
>>
>>62641269
you're the one that said it was fud. i just see it as reality. you literally can't compare LINK to any other crypto because nearly everything else in the space has zero use-case. LINK, however, is currently being used a TON and climbing, but the token won't actually enter price discovery until no one can meaningfully increase the supply to offset any increased demand. until then, it's just we cassandras that know what's coming
>>
>>62640495
its actually how incredible how little attention chainlink gets on X, their tweets barely break 1k likes most times. even their announcement about LinkNYC yesterday only got 900 likes. do normies really not know about it?



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.