>using $0.35 report
they'll just subscribe to the monthly stream

>muh gmx fees
literal pocket dust

File: 1765770681019294.png (70 KB, 412x120)

70 KB PNG

>>62648157
>>using $0.35 report
>they'll just subscribe to the monthly stream
It's the same price

>>62648134
>Infograph by TheLinkPanda

baseless hype. pure speculation.

Do not give attention to such low level emotional engagement bait. We have no idea how valuable the network will be until it is running at scale.

File: Screenshot 2026-09-01 050150.png (21 KB, 942x472)

21 KB PNG

>>62648176
how does that make any sense? higher volume feeds will just use the subscription.

>>62648186
source on pic?

>>62648191
i used ai to make an infographic for quick understanding of the per report vs subscription argument

you can't really get hyped about allot of volume, because if the fee's exceed $150 per feed per month why would they not just do the subscription for that feed?

you are better off speculating the number of feeds they'll need and how many subscriptions in total.

>>62648199
Why would you assume subscriptions cost the same for 100 reports per month and 100,000 reports per month?

>>62648201
https://docs.chain.link/data-streams/rate-limits

it's based more on a per second basis, and they get 10 per second for the "normal" subscription. which is roughly 26 million requests a month if like traffic is constant without surges in use...yada yada....normal operations

if they go outside that then yes that have to negotiate a different subscription model with link directly.

>>62648209
You're conflating "requests" with "reports".
You get 10 "requests" per second via the REST service, but reports are streamed via the Websocket, and making requests via REST doesn't influence that at all.

>>62648313
ohh yeah, you're right

you're still talking millions / tens of millions reports per month on a single stream. which is plenty even for high frequency use cases.

argument of link theoretical income per reporting total vs total subscriptions still leans toward subscriptions in my opinion.

thanks for the fun chat anon. going to get some rest. if thread is still up when i'm back i'll answer any more questions / arguments.

>>62648450
>you're still talking millions / tens of millions reports per month on a single stream
are you?

chart

Pay up
You gotta pay up

>>62648134
ccip makes less than a hot dog stand

>>62648134
Price chart

>>62648201
Because he's a retard that never seen the inner workings of an org/service like this

>>62648899
sirgay has created a failed project
should've stuck with the hotdog business model