Can BTC go to 200k already? I just want to be happy...
>>62653151At least she never came from BBC it changes her brain matter. Daughters are a rough investment
dont share sad pictures like that you son of a bitch
>>62653162Imagine obsessing over interracial cuckoldry every single waking moment of your day.
>>62653151She an hero herself. I bet it was because of him.
>>62653213((((americans)))).....
>>62653162I have two sons and I can tell you having daughters is much safer.historically, only 50% of all men reproduced (rest did not get laid, died in a war or a risky job) while 90% of women did. with boys, you are spending all your resources on your children for 20+ years just for them to fail to score a job (let's be real, gen alpha is fucked economically) or girl (one leads to another) and your bloodline ending with it...with a girl, the biggest risk is she goes into academia and becomes a career-woman and marries too late. if you ask me that is much easier to prevent than your son to becoming unemployed/depressed/unmotivated and getting out of the gene pool. the other risk is getting pregnant early and being dumped - but at least you would have one grandkid from that.
>>62653693>historically, only 50% of all men reproduced (rest did not get laid, died in a war or a risky job) while 90% of women did. i can't believe proles who say this still exist.it's the other way around. historically, most men reproduced, while about 50% of women did not, because they were unmarriagable and because about 50% of them died in childbirth.what you just said is an inversion of the truth. before modern medicine tons of women died in labor.
>>62653693with daughters your girls remain indebted for life and only have 1 child with down syndrome in their 30s, often with no father present
>>62653793>Historical data confirms that female mortality rates often exceeded male rates during reproductive ages in pre-industrial populations, primarily due to maternal mortality from childbirth complications. Research on pre-industrial England (1650–1800) shows maternal mortality averaged 10 per 1,000 births, a rate 50 times higher than today, which significantly elevated female death rates in their 20s and 30s. https://psc.isr.umich.edu/news/new-insights-on-historic-causes-of-maternal-deaths/>In historical populations, female death rates usually exceeded male death rates during the reproductive ages. The most obvious cause of this difference is deaths resulting from childbirth. Parish registers show that maternal mortality in pre-industrial England (1650-1800) averaged 10 per 1,000 births – or 1.0 percent, 50 times higher than today. Childbearing dramatically increased the mortality of married women– but were they more likely to die than their husbands from other causes? >In a study just out in Population Studies, historical demographer George Alter applies a new method that sheds new light on the role of deaths following childbirth to explain sex differences in mortality, and on the conditions that caused high maternal mortality in pre-industrial England. The results highlight the extraordinary vulnerability of mothers in the weeks following a birth. It used to be way, way harder to be a woman. Although limp-wristed liberal cowards act like men used to die a lot in war; in reality very few did.But childbirth...childbirth used to be more violent and bloody than any war ever was. Women were more likely to die from childbirth than men were from war. Life for women before modern medicine was kind of like a war of its own.
>>62653693I also have two sons and agree with you on this. I’m a 60/40 split on wanting a daughter/son with my third kid. Men bear so much suffering. When I look at my boys’ joyful expressions, i can feel guilt for what their lives will entail.
>>62653151>$200k from here is a whole 2xShitcoins are doing that on a daily basis.
>>62653162what happened in your life to make you obsess about penis?
>>62653693>>62653942if you have kids in a jew conquered nation or while being a wagie you are committing child abuseyour genes are trash and had no reason to be passed onkys
>>62653151That would mean I only have 49k...make it go to 1 million, please
>>62653793>>62653869How does a 1% chance of dying in childbirth equate to 50% of them dying in childbirth?
>>62653162BASED
>>62653990>lay down and die, my fellow whites((())))
>>62655013>he thinks his ugly, poor and dumb kids are going to be the next napoleon / hitler
>>62655031>fellow whites, we are insignificant, we should lay down and die((()))
>>62655035t.
>>62653151It’s going to 20k fag the 80k was an exit pump
>>62653693>Muh blood line!Who cares dude, you'll be dead.
>>62653693Who cares about your genes>>62655048This, what a fucking retard. And at least an incel son would not commit his father's crime to bring another innocent into this world
>>62655038This poster confirmed as nonwhite
>>62655038>yes fellow whites, you will look like that pic I posted if you make an offspring>only inbreds want to have more whites in the world, my fellow whites((()))>>62655048Daymn! Incel is salty Lmao
>>62653151he doesnt realize it but this outcome was better than her inevitably bringing home a nigger one day
>>62653693In terms of genetic proliferation, boys are high risk, high reward while a daughter is low risk, low reward. Chad sons will give you tons of grandkids via pump and dumps, daughters will give you a few grandkids as they are left with the kids and can only handle so many and non chad sons may give you one or two if youre lucky otherwise they are genetic dead ends.
>>62653213Imagine ignoring your own races genocide because you don't want to look bad in front of your liberal psychopath friends.
>>62653162first reply and it's about black cock. why is 4chan like this? take your meds.
>>62653990>>62655031>>62655038The groypers are here to suck each other off brown guy style
