Do i try and snipe some upstart antiAI platform going public like VGen or BountyHTR? Ai has made BANK, but now i feel like keeping my funds in is pure delusion. What do?
>>62678081Get REKT clanker
>>62678081IT'S FUCKING OVER...
>>62678081that looks so ridiculous and i love these videos, but it really has come a long way. these things could barely fucking walk a few years ago.
Remind me to use a less entertaining video the next time I ask a question...
reminds me of
>>62678081>Working prototype more or less works and does something futuristic and unthinkable 5 years ago>several companies and states pouring heaps of money into a technology that will change the world: slaves are back and they are less lazy than niggers>short AII mean, you shouldn't own model companies (moat is thin as paper, open weights if you try to monetise it and become profitable, hundreds of competitors, some gigafunded by Chinese govt); these are bs. Don't buy the IPOs. And you can sell green stuff right now to take profits because we're heading for a Septembear pre-mid-terms correction.But during any dips I'm stocking up on miners, uraniun, REE, AI and robots until I have to keep lights off and use my phone torch because I'm so broke.
Spook! Somebody, post some roy jay dances itt
>>62678132Firstly, thanks for actually responding to the words and so kindly providing an image of all the other "people" in this thread who cant read. I bought early, and now I sense a pullback. Im up nearly 20x of a small investment that has devpured my portfolio and im wondering if you guys would recommend moving in on this "anti AI" trend in a monetary way. I think its promising.
>>62678120Its not the video, anonIts the boardAnd the internet in generalThat being said, its a tricky spot right now. Remember the market can be insolvent and retarded on a longer timeframe than individual investors can. The race to the exits is going to be fucking brutal whenever it begins, but as long as you aren't using leverage, a taper out (to exactly where I have no fucking clue desu) should be pretty safe
Why do giggatards confuscate LLMs with robots? Not even real robots like you see in industry but these toys. >da AI + robotics gonna take over all jerbs>posts video of chinkshit toys >thinks LLMs are Artificial Intelligence >jUsT yOu WaItWho's peddling this to normgroids?
>>62678125She must have slipped into the training data
>>62678120What kind of replies were you expecting? Some people will tell you its an artificially inflated bubble waiting to pop. Other people will tell you it's too big to fail. Both views are probably correct. Now shut up and post more entertaining bullshit.
>>62678366Lmao
>>62678081Buy an ad, jeet
>>62678081Vaxxed status?
>>62678179If you think that AI is due to a major correction, go defensive with something like LVHD (or its core holdings if you're not an ETF guy).Otherwise just keeping stacking Nvidia, hyperscalers, miners and robot companies.
>>62678081FUCKING KEK what a RETARDED machine, AI is so fucking done
>>62678589the fuck am I even shilling? Chinese robots? Fuck a captcha, they need to add a single paragraph that you have to read out loud. When one of these knuckle draggers puts their finger to the screen to read it, it should IP ban them and confiscate their izzat.
>>62678081This triggers some deep pathological response in me for cruelty. I imagine the market for robots will be huge just so people can watch them suffer.
>>62679525Better than them torturing monkies
>>62678081I dont get this robot hype at all. >Moves a bit faster than ASIMO did fucking 15 years agoFucking so what.Make it do anything useful already l, not dance badly or play tennis badly.Why the fuck do we need humanoid robots at all?
>>62680077They're telling you they're for hazardous and menial jobs, which means that's exactly what they AREN'T designed to ultimately do, because we live in a fundamentally dishonest world. Worst case is they're prototyping some nightmare UN clanker military apparatus, but at the moment they're at the mercy of a single stairstep
robots are so cringe, even worse than chatbots, just get this shit out of here
>>62680077We need them to do work obviously. what are you? stupid?
>>62678081why does it just shut off when it didn't the first time?
>>62678081Bros why is so hard for braindead people like op to realize, that AI IS NOT GONNA replace muscle, but it gonna REPLACE cognition? Why is it so hard for them to understand, that AI is a soul and robotic is body? Why do they think data centers and automation does not means robotic dancers and terminators, but ai controlled soldiers and hoards of replaced tech workers and salesman?Are they baiting? Or they are really this retarded??? Genuine question.Like nigga op literaly think a robot failing to do some dance in chinkland ===ai art is over. Please make me understand this retardedness.Btw op, your video is hilarious, walks like a geriatric boomer with turbo Parkinson Lamo
>>62678081Everything in me was hoping the bot started juking and jiving again as it was being led away. Shit wouldve destroyed my sides.
>>62678120You knew what you were doing, asshole.
>>62681065I think you might be retarded. I asked a question about stocks and included video of "le dancing robot" because it was on my phone and i needed a file to post a topic. Unfortunately people some how projected a correlation between this funny guy face planting and earnings calls. Dont worry, its hereditary, so just dont breed and all of you will be fine.>>62681175>local retard mad when he realizes hes a retard- now its everyone elses fault
>>62681477>ai is booming>100gw of data center on the way>guys I think it gonna collapse is it good idea to invest in obsolete ideas??And you posted that video too, a video that if you go online people literally connected with ai and “hurr durr shit can’t even walk and it’s gonna take our job lollolol”You know what you were doing asshole and you are mad because I called you out for being an absolute delusional retard. But yeah, go invest all your money in whatever you like
>>62680077humanoid robots can step into any human job and do the work.in the far far future, robots will be hyperspecialized and anything not customer-facing will probably look totally alien.
>>62681889It only took you multiple replies to actually read the post, lmao. And im certainly dissapointed at the lack of reading comprehension, but youd have to continue being retarded in a way that affects me for me to get angry with you just because youre being dumb. Assuming that others get as mad as you do over what genuinely might be bait, is a pretty hefty projection. But hey, if youre only pretending to be brain dead... you got me!
>>62682231Not angry, and u read the first time too. I am just baffled by sheer delusion of people like youNow if you can get angry over a reply by someone who might actually be a bot, well bud, that’s your problem
>>62681065it's not gonna do any of thati remember falling for this common bait in 2023 but they cant get it to do shitanyone who uses ai a lot knows how shit it isbest thing op can do is forget about all of this and just invest in normal stuff that will survive (but he wants to gamble so he won't)
>>62678125While shes crying thousands were dying from the magnitude 8 earthquake she set off
>>62678081Whichever AI companie(s) win the race will have massive profits (assuming they don't cause the extinction of humanity in the process). There are hardly any guardrails since companies and governments are all racing each other to ASI. Anyways, if we get a good timeline and AI turns out good without causing catastrophe, then picking the right AI companies will have a huge payout in the short-term. Of course the trick is picking the right company. I'm kind of skeptical smaller companies will be able to build the best models without getting bought out or copied then out-innovated before ipo.
>>62678351You are just an idiot
>>62681065You are retarded, it will replace both
>>62678132What's the bull case for Uranium? I've beem holding a minor position since May and I know it's oversold, but I don't see any major moves from the state that could prop it up.
>>62683306There is none, everyone is installing gas turbines because they are much cheaper to build up and energy is seen as a bottleneck and not something to improve the environment anymore.Look up what happened to Siemmens energy, they went balls deep into wind turbines, that flopped and they did a x6 selling gas turbines
>>62682957What? Did you have a stroke while writing this?
