Start a business selling whatever, doesn't really matter.As CEO publicly 4chan post on X and other places, making racist, antisemitic and similar posts.Stir up controversy and people trying to cancel you.Streisand effect happens and your business gets in front of millions of eyeballs.Your sales moon and you get rich.Why wouldn't this work?
>>62679202But how do you eat kids in that?
>>62679202don't expect to have a bank account
>>62679202>start website called 4chan>bunch of anons start posting antisemitic posts>mainstream media calls for banning it>streisand effect I Choose You>it was not very effective>advertisers blacklist 4chan
>>62679325Fuck niggers!See i won, idc others!
>>62679207Its a foreskin nibbling mask anon
>>62679325>be racist>loser>basically retarded person>post on 4chan>offend all the not retarded people>not retarded people leave>WHY ARE 4CHAN POSTERS ALL RETARDED NOW!?!?>Site fucking dies
Not only do people hate racists,But they hate them enough to take one of the most popular websites in the world and bankrupt it
>>62680374>>62680394The absolute state of leftists
>>62680394Everybody is racist, anonIngroup/outgroup selection is baked right into your genes. Doesnt mean you have to harm anybody or froth at the mouth about it, you just have to understand nature instead of trying to square peg it to fit an unnatural worldview.The rest of your posts are just schizophrenic noise>>62680540The irony is they've never actually been very intelligent as a group, because they lack the discipline for real academics. And I've been around a LOT of them>t. PhD
>>62680374You must be new here if you think anyone was ever offended on 4chan.The place you think of is reddit, and well... Reddit is full of absolute retards, it's even worse than 2026 4Chan, so yeah.
>>62680547I've been here since 2011I've watched you chase everyone with a brain away
>>62680557I've been here since 2009, approxI doubt you've been here since 2011, or you'd remember that racism and conspiracies were all over 4chan since day one. I mean, it's one of the only place online where you can say whatever you want, so obviously you're going to see a lot of weird shit.The idea that 4chan was once this site full of super intelligent leftists who ran away because the mean stupid rightoids came is retarded and factually wrong.Whoever leaves this website leaves because they got recked in a debate, there is no one here to upvote your stupid opinion, or downvote legitimate ideas. Whoever is most convincing wins. The idea that smart people would leave because they can't defend their viewpoints against retards on 4chan makes absolutely no sense. It is the case on reddit, because any retarded argument will get upvoted and rise in visibility as long as it fits into the general reddit mindset, ensuring that legitimate discourse is burried.Stop trying to rewrite history, the only reason you find this site dumber is because you grew up and realised that actually smart people are out in the world doing shit, and not on 4Chan. Most people here are smarter than your average redditor, but only marginally. You have your occasionnal genius, but 4chan was never a place for intellectual geniuses, it may have looked like that to you when you were 15 and didn't know better, but it was never the case.
Yeah dood people really care about a hecking racist chuddarino CEO when our governments full of Epstein pedophile drama and the worlds richest man spends all day shit posting on his own social media site
>>62680631That's def more true than that other anons rantI lurked for like a half decade starting in like 2009ish (who fucking knows it was so long ago, not to mention actual oldfaggotry is more embarrassing than cloutchasing for anons who know) and the tier of discourse seems to go through waves from what I've seen. No idea when the high point would have been because I took a multi year hiatus for school, thinking I beat the "you're here forever" meme, but here we are. I think we can all agree this is a low point for the site, the botposting and polposting is absolutely out of fucking control and nobody has any bantz or oc anymore, since it's been replaced with 3rd worlders who can't into fun or 'not your personal army'
>>62679202I facet gems for funsies (no revenue) and was playing with ways to cut symbols that show up when you look through the table.Is there a market for high quality gems with swastikas cut into them?
>>62681313Around here you'll probably get some interest, but you'd obv have more customers if you did stuff like Celtic knots or other normie tier 'magical' symbols.You could also court 'real' spooks and make gems with other occult symbols; some of that crowd will pay quite well for quality gems with specific symbols for spell or ritual purposesThird, you could troll the neonazi crowd and put the real swastika in instead of the hakenkreuz lol (or make them a matched set with the opposing hook directions for obfuscative purposes). Just ideas
>>62680631>super intelligent leftists who ran awayHahahahaahhaha kys newfag
>>62680631>>62681409Nvm i cant read sry long day
>>62679202It won't work because jews will close your bank account and if you live in yurup you will be arrested.
>>62681313>How to have a business destroying controversy in three easy steps!I don't think you recognize you could probably get sued for this depending on country.
>>62680546>The irony is they've never actually been very intelligent as a group, because they lack the discipline for real academics. And I've been around a LOT of them>Most academics lean leftHuh?
>>62679207It’s actually a holocaust mask (in the original meaning of the word) where they put it on the face of the kids they burn so they don’t have to see their faces as they burnt them as an offering
>>62681706>what is the reproducibility crisisI see you haven't been around an academic institution in a long whileThe leftists have brought down almost the whole western academic apparatus in truth. Its actually way, way worse than you may imagine. There's enough money and clout for the machine to keep operating at severe financial and performance loss for quite some time, but unless the culture does a total divorce from politics, its over for the university system wrt real innovation. The ones that want nothing to do with political shit, or the closet leaning conservatives (tbf leaning at best) are the ones producing any meaningful body of work. There's also a good amount of cowards that say the 'right thing' to avoid conflict, but have no passion or care for whatever is going on politically or culturally
>>62681952meds, now.
>>62682106>boilerplate glowie response>no rebuttal
>>62682124How do you respond to complete nonsense?Funnily enough, you still haven't addressed how you said there's no leftists in academia even though academia has repeatedly been shown to be mostly left-leaning.
>>62682131I seeYou really haven't heard of the reproducibility crisis then?Over *half* the body of scientific literature is not able to be recreated outside of its original body of work, meaning it is bad science. The least effected areas of the sciences are based around 'crunchier' math (I.e. chemistry/physics/engineering), but they're still nearer 40%. *ALL* other fields are running dangerously close to outright quackery, with some social sciences being 80+% non-reproducible.That's the group that is overwhelmingly populated with paper-mill-tier 'scientists' that care more about their political messaging than their chosen career and have made both arenas worse off for it. Does that clarify my position?
>>62682144How the fuck is any of that relevant to you claiming academia isn't majority leftist?
>>62682146Why are you reversing the point?'Academia' is majority leftistActual 'doing the work' academics are notThought that was pretty clear the first time
>>62682156>Actual 'doing the work' academics are notYou didn't actually show anything supporting that. Even if your argument is "only a handful of academics actually do work!", the fact the majority of academics lean left would then mean the majority of those academics would also lean left.
>>62682161There we goNow you're starting to get up to speedAnd what does that say about this majority of the group if their body of work is consistently provable junk?
>>62682169But you're saying there's a minority of "true" academics, who by all accounts would still be majority leftists.
>>62682171Only in your mind am I saying thatIs there a hard and fast standard that *every* leftist has to be bad at science? NoAre they overall exceptionally poor at rigorous application of the scientific method? Provably yes
>>62682180Ok but the majority of academics are still leftist, even if you only count "true" academics.
>>62682188If you use your brain you would know that the majority of academics did not participate in a poll stating their political beliefs. And the ones that do know they will be cancelled if they say right wing
